Sanders and Galbraith
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3440 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Sanders and Galbraith
These two were fairly marquee signings that have barely string 10 appearances together between them, what's going on when the solution against Derby is to bring on a CM not far off 40?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12596
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 2581 times
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 818 times
- Been thanked: 952 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Not only that, but who did the 39 year old CM come on to replace…that’s right, another of our super summer signings. A STRIKER who is absolutely dog sh*t.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12596
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 2581 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
I've been saying that for weeks . He did improve a bit but quite frankly he offers nothing . I watched him closely today . He wins nothing in the air , wins nothing on the ground and can't even hold up the ball . Out of our two non scoring strikers I'd rather we kept Drinan .The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:52 pm Not only that, but who did the 39 year old CM come on to replace…that’s right, another of our super summer signings. A STRIKER who is absolutely dog sh*t.
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 818 times
- Been thanked: 952 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
I had actually been one of those defending him for some time. But today was the last straw for me.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:59 pmI've been saying that for weeks . He did improve a bit but quite frankly he offers nothing . I watched him closely today . He wins nothing in the air , wins nothing on the ground and can't even hold up the ball . Out of our two non scoring strikers I'd rather we kept Drinan .The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:52 pm Not only that, but who did the 39 year old CM come on to replace…that’s right, another of our super summer signings. A STRIKER who is absolutely dog sh*t.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 429 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
And that’s saying somethingRedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:59 pmI've been saying that for weeks . He did improve a bit but quite frankly he offers nothing . I watched him closely today . He wins nothing in the air , wins nothing on the ground and can't even hold up the ball . Out of our two non scoring strikers I'd rather we kept Drinan .The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:52 pm Not only that, but who did the 39 year old CM come on to replace…that’s right, another of our super summer signings. A STRIKER who is absolutely dog sh*t.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:58 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 557 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
We do not have any L1 standard strikers
Piggot, Drinan are both L2 standard
Forde is a young kid who is an impact sub but again not L1 standard
We have no attacking threat what so ever.
RW is no mug, he must know this and knows it needs addressing, but the big Q is how and with what?????
Piggot, Drinan are both L2 standard
Forde is a young kid who is an impact sub but again not L1 standard
We have no attacking threat what so ever.
RW is no mug, he must know this and knows it needs addressing, but the big Q is how and with what?????
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12596
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 2581 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
I completely agree except Agyei could potentially be league 1 standard . We won't know for sure until he gets fully up to speed .Richie has already said we need new forwards brought in during the January transfer window . I just hope the club has already identified who they want and go for them as soon as the window opens . We need them here ASAP .Stan1972 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:14 pm We do not have any L1 standard strikers
Piggot, Drinan are both L2 standard
Forde is a young kid who is an impact sub but again not L1 standard
We have no attacking threat what so ever.
RW is no mug, he must know this and knows it needs addressing, but the big Q is how and with what?????
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5221
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 668 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
I expect it will be Piggot operating as an immobile 10 behind Agyei as the pacy 9 once he’s fully fit. Presumably that was always the plan.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12596
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 2581 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Actually , I'm fully expecting that but we had better also bring in a new winger as well .
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:53 am
- Has thanked: 437 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
I honestly think Piggot is gone. Time will tell.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 11:34 pm I expect it will be Piggot operating as an immobile 10 behind Agyei as the pacy 9 once he’s fully fit. Presumably that was always the plan.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:28 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 186 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Sanders is shaping up to be the 2023/24 version of Callum Reilly. Never seems to be fit. Galbraith was played totally out of position at wing back for a few games. I thought that he was billed as a creative central midfielder.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3440 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Yeah Galbraith was meant to be a younger Moncur CAM role and Sanders the Clay replacement that was supposedly meant to free up El Miz to play further up.Highwood Man wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:36 am Sanders is shaping up to be the 2023/24 version of Callum Reilly. Never seems to be fit. Galbraith was played totally out of position at wing back for a few games. I thought that he was billed as a creative central midfielder.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1032 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
- EliotNes
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10689
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Retired (4182)
- Has thanked: 2049 times
- Been thanked: 884 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Galbraith was on the bench yesterday, but where Sanders was - answers on a postcard, - as he started against Chesterfield.
- EliotNes
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10689
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Retired (4182)
- Has thanked: 2049 times
- Been thanked: 884 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
I'd have Craig Clay back - always good for the first half or the last 20 mins to disrupt opposition attacks and not as prone to missing matches due to injuries as some of the other midfielders we have had in the 6 years he was with us.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:03 pmYeah Galbraith was meant to be a younger Moncur CAM role and Sanders the Clay replacement that was supposedly meant to free up El Miz to play further up.Highwood Man wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:36 am Sanders is shaping up to be the 2023/24 version of Callum Reilly. Never seems to be fit. Galbraith was played totally out of position at wing back for a few games. I thought that he was billed as a creative central midfielder.
I hadn't paid much attention to RW bemoaning the lack of experience at times in the playing eleven, but after seeing the way Pratley and Beckles mixed it with the Derby midfield and forwards after they came on yesterday, which we weren't doing before, I can see his point. Which again makes me think why did we let Clay go - unless we didn't offer him a long enough contract.
Oh for the January window. Let's hope that helps.
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 818 times
- Been thanked: 952 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Craig Clay belongs absolutely nowhere near a league 1 squad. Love the guy to bits, but to suggest that he would have been the solution to our current problems is utterly absurd.EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:44 pmI'd have Craig Clay back - always good for the first half or the last 20 mins to disrupt opposition attacks and not as prone to missing matches due to injuries as some of the other midfielders we have had in the 6 years he was with us.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:03 pmYeah Galbraith was meant to be a younger Moncur CAM role and Sanders the Clay replacement that was supposedly meant to free up El Miz to play further up.Highwood Man wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:36 am Sanders is shaping up to be the 2023/24 version of Callum Reilly. Never seems to be fit. Galbraith was played totally out of position at wing back for a few games. I thought that he was billed as a creative central midfielder.
I hadn't paid much attention to RW bemoaning the lack of experience at times in the playing eleven, but after seeing the way Pratley and Beckles mixed it with the Derby midfield and forwards after they came on yesterday, which we weren't doing before, I can see his point. Which again makes me think why did we let Clay go - unless we didn't offer him a long enough contract.
Oh for the January window. Let's hope that helps.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5221
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 668 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Agreed that the difference when Beckles and Pratley came on was instantly noticeable.EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:44 pmI'd have Craig Clay back - always good for the first half or the last 20 mins to disrupt opposition attacks and not as prone to missing matches due to injuries as some of the other midfielders we have had in the 6 years he was with us.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:03 pmYeah Galbraith was meant to be a younger Moncur CAM role and Sanders the Clay replacement that was supposedly meant to free up El Miz to play further up.Highwood Man wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:36 am Sanders is shaping up to be the 2023/24 version of Callum Reilly. Never seems to be fit. Galbraith was played totally out of position at wing back for a few games. I thought that he was billed as a creative central midfielder.
I hadn't paid much attention to RW bemoaning the lack of experience at times in the playing eleven, but after seeing the way Pratley and Beckles mixed it with the Derby midfield and forwards after they came on yesterday, which we weren't doing before, I can see his point. Which again makes me think why did we let Clay go - unless we didn't offer him a long enough contract.
Oh for the January window. Let's hope that helps.
But Clay isn’t L2 standard, never mind L1.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3440 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Clay wouldn't be the answer but an older head / L1 journeyman or two is needed. Not enough proven L1 nous in the squad at present.EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:44 pmI'd have Craig Clay back - always good for the first half or the last 20 mins to disrupt opposition attacks and not as prone to missing matches due to injuries as some of the other midfielders we have had in the 6 years he was with us.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:03 pmYeah Galbraith was meant to be a younger Moncur CAM role and Sanders the Clay replacement that was supposedly meant to free up El Miz to play further up.Highwood Man wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:36 am Sanders is shaping up to be the 2023/24 version of Callum Reilly. Never seems to be fit. Galbraith was played totally out of position at wing back for a few games. I thought that he was billed as a creative central midfielder.
I hadn't paid much attention to RW bemoaning the lack of experience at times in the playing eleven, but after seeing the way Pratley and Beckles mixed it with the Derby midfield and forwards after they came on yesterday, which we weren't doing before, I can see his point. Which again makes me think why did we let Clay go - unless we didn't offer him a long enough contract.
Oh for the January window. Let's hope that helps.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5221
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 668 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Not sure if anyone has said this before but it’s almost as if we need a bit more experience in our starting XI.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 652 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Clay certainly wouldn’t be the answer but if a few others like Pigott, Moncur had his grit and determination we as a team would be better off. Clay always gave 101% effort while not being one of our better players.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 1:42 pmClay wouldn't be the answer but an older head / L1 journeyman or two is needed. Not enough proven L1 nous in the squad at present.EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:44 pmI'd have Craig Clay back - always good for the first half or the last 20 mins to disrupt opposition attacks and not as prone to missing matches due to injuries as some of the other midfielders we have had in the 6 years he was with us.
I hadn't paid much attention to RW bemoaning the lack of experience at times in the playing eleven, but after seeing the way Pratley and Beckles mixed it with the Derby midfield and forwards after they came on yesterday, which we weren't doing before, I can see his point. Which again makes me think why did we let Clay go - unless we didn't offer him a long enough contract.
Oh for the January window. Let's hope that helps.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3440 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Oh yes his commitment and workrate were always top notch. Unfortunately L2 is his limit, this level is another notch up fitness and technical wiseCheshunto wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 6:32 pmClay certainly wouldn’t be the answer but if a few others like Pigott, Moncur had his grit and determination we as a team would be better off. Clay always gave 101% effort while not being one of our better players.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 1:42 pmClay wouldn't be the answer but an older head / L1 journeyman or two is needed. Not enough proven L1 nous in the squad at present.EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:44 pm
I'd have Craig Clay back - always good for the first half or the last 20 mins to disrupt opposition attacks and not as prone to missing matches due to injuries as some of the other midfielders we have had in the 6 years he was with us.
I hadn't paid much attention to RW bemoaning the lack of experience at times in the playing eleven, but after seeing the way Pratley and Beckles mixed it with the Derby midfield and forwards after they came on yesterday, which we weren't doing before, I can see his point. Which again makes me think why did we let Clay go - unless we didn't offer him a long enough contract.
Oh for the January window. Let's hope that helps.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12596
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 2581 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
Craig Clay was a great servant to the club who walked away with two championship winning medals but he would have struggled massively at League 1 level .gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 6:40 pmOh yes his commitment and workrate were always top notch. Unfortunately L2 is his limit, this level is another notch up fitness and technical wise
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 444 times
Re: Sanders and Galbraith
That in a nutshell is the story of watching Orient for 50 years, it always a compromise. We either have triers with limited talent (Clay), or talented players with less effort (Moncur). If they have talent AND they try, they normally move on to better things.