Page 1 of 3

Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:38 pm
by moonwalk19
QPR forward signed on a season long loan . Has not played much for QPR.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:48 pm
by WilliamTell
Started once. Originally at Southend.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:49 pm
by MrB
Have we had him on loan?

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:59 pm
by Chicken Dhansak
Calling Poundshop.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:02 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Chicken Dhansak wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:59 pm Calling Poundshop.
He’s answered on the other thread

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:10 pm
by Constanza
Welcome aboard Proper

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:43 pm
by tuffers#1


Kin hell 👀👀

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:44 pm
by tuffers#1

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:49 pm
by soloman
Not a bad team that Southend lot !

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:50 pm
by tuffers#1

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:49 pm
by tuffers#1

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:53 pm
by EliotNes
Underwhelming. But I'll give him every chance.

But I'd have rather had another forward on loan from QPR i.e. Macca.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:08 pm
by Max Fowler
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:44 pm
Two decent strikes, one scuffed penalty and two empty net tap ins. What a season, son!

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:09 pm
by Max Fowler
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:43 pm

Kin hell 👀👀
The goalie :lol:

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:11 pm
by Story of O
EliotNes wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:53 pm Underwhelming. But I'll give him every chance.

But I'd have rather had another forward on loan from QPR i.e. Macca.
Is that the Macca a lot on here were moaning about when we first signed him

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:12 pm
by Long slender neck
Obviously has something about him to get a long contract at QPR.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:14 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Apple Wumble wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:38 pm
by tuffers#1
Gary the Plumber wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:08 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:44 pm
Two decent strikes, one scuffed penalty and two empty net tap ins. What a season, son!
So better than you sausage in a bun

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:40 pm
by tuffers#1
Gary the Plumber wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:09 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:43 pm

Kin hell 👀👀
The goalie :lol:
The player who list the ball

Now if you laughed at him I
Might think you knew what you were talking about

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:45 pm
by LittleMate
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:14 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:40 pm
by tuffers#1
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:14 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
Probably the loanees choice to come here .

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:54 pm
by waigO
Hasn’t set the world alight with goals but looks a clever player, strong movement and good reviews from Southend and Gillingham. Only 20 years old so give the guy a chance.

Makes me laugh when people say ‘poor goal record’ or ‘never heard of him’ about a young loanee. How many of you had heard of our most successful top division loanees before they joined and how many were prolific before joining?

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:32 pm
by Max Fowler
LittleMate wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:45 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:14 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.

I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.

But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………

Re: Charlie Kelman

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:51 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:43 pm

Kin hell 👀👀
Absolutely . I wouldn't mind him doing that for us .