EliotNes wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:53 pm
Underwhelming. But I'll give him every chance.
But I'd have rather had another forward on loan from QPR i.e. Macca.
Is that the Macca a lot on here were moaning about when we first signed him
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:12 pm
by Long slender neck
Obviously has something about him to get a long contract at QPR.
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:14 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm
Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm
Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm
Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
Probably the loanees choice to come here .
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:54 pm
by waigO
Hasn’t set the world alight with goals but looks a clever player, strong movement and good reviews from Southend and Gillingham. Only 20 years old so give the guy a chance.
Makes me laugh when people say ‘poor goal record’ or ‘never heard of him’ about a young loanee. How many of you had heard of our most successful top division loanees before they joined and how many were prolific before joining?
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:16 pm
Give him his due, Lingy knew what we needed and I’m happy that we’ve filled the gap by adding yet another unproven kid to our squad.
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………