Page 38 of 264
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:55 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
So she's Jewish and anti-semitic? Ok, I get it now.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 11:24 am
by Currywurst and Chips
RedO wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:55 am
So she's Jewish and anti-semitic? Ok, I get it now.
I don't know her so couldn't say. She does have previous for making antisemitic remarks which she has apologised for
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:24 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
When you've had many not a few
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:00 pm
by Thor
What a slob
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:06 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Worse than this in the House of Commons??
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:20 pm
by Thor
Whilst that is unbecoming of a member of the house, lady thornbury has her feet up on the seats and coyos that is far worse as other people have to sit on those seats.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:30 pm
by BoniO
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:20 pm
Whilst that is unbecoming of a member of the house, lady thornbury has her feet up on the seats and coyos that is far worse as other people have to sit on those seats.
Look again. Her feet are not on the seat. Derrr..
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:11 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:20 pm
Whilst that is unbecoming of a member of the house, lady thornbury has her feet up on the seats and coyos that is far worse as other people have to sit on those seats.
The soles of her feet are not in contact with the seats. You’re making sh*t up, for a change.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:12 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:20 pm
Whilst that is unbecoming of a member of the house, lady thornbury has her feet up on the seats and coyos that is far worse as other people have to sit on those seats.
Oh f*** off, of course Mogg lounging about like that whilst supposedly at work is worse.
Can’t stand Thornberry but there’s nothing wrong with that photo, only a Tory troll would suggest there is,
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 11:38 pm
by Thor
If I saw her slobbed all over the seat like that I’d say to her “oi thoornbury, you might be a fat slob, but here’s no reason to put you tree trunks up on the chair, put them down women”
Said in an angry frank tone from Harry Enfield and chums.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:56 am
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 11:38 pm
If I saw her slobbed all over the seat like that I’d say to her “oi thoornbury, you might be a fat slob, but here’s no reason to put you tree trunks up on the chair, put them down women”
Said in an angry frank tone from Harry Enfield and chums.
Shed kick the Sh*t out of you Thory boy & youd say thank you miss
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:52 am
by Disoriented
No issue with Thornberry’s posture. Rees-Mugg on the other hand showed himself up for what he is - an arrogant, ignorant, elitist tw*t.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:02 am
by Long slender neck
Who cares really?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:03 pm
by Long slender neck
Just seen the latest left wing bun fight. Labour will be utterly finished if they choose RLB as leader.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:28 pm
by Dunners
It's incredible. CLP officials in the seats they recently lost must be in complete despair.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:29 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:03 pm
Just seen the latest left wing bun fight. Labour will be utterly finished if they choose RLB as leader.
What's your issue with her?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:33 pm
by Long slender neck
She looks weird.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 7:14 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
It's fantastic, they care far far more about keeping their brand of politics running the Labour Party than they do about winning elections.
You'd think the worst result in 85 years would've been a wakeup call but no. The leadership have stayed on and been able to control the narrative amongst their drones that it was Brexit not Jeremy that lost it.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:01 pm
by Disoriented
Time to ditch the Marxism and become electable.
RLB = oblivion
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:49 pm
by Nice Username
Imagine having to actively pretend Long Bailey is the answer, actually feel a bit sorry for the left now.
Not convinced about any of the others, but if Starmer or Nandy win, it will at least take the party out of the control of lunatics for a while.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:23 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
There will be lots of abuse along these lines, no doubt.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:23 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Nice Username wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:49 pm
Imagine having to actively pretend Long Bailey is the answer, actually feel a bit sorry for the left now.
It’s good that you no longer pretend to be on the left.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 8:25 am
by Millennial Snowflake
Play the ball and not the man for once. What makes you think RLB would be a good leader who'd make Labour electable?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 8:39 am
by Mistadobalina
She has absolutely no stand out qualities or characteristics. Endlessly uses the word communities in the vapid way that no mark politicians do. Other than loyalty to Corbyn, what are you voting for with her?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:39 pm
by Max B Gold
Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 8:39 am
She has absolutely no stand out qualities or characteristics. Endlessly uses the word communities in the vapid way that no mark politicians do. Other than loyalty to Corbyn, what are you voting for with her?
Err let me see. I know, aside from her obviously defective personality you could consider the policies she is putting forward.
Your visceral hatred of this woman is clearly visible and worrying. It's time Labour had a woman leader.