Page 340 of 342

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:37 pm
by SvenO
https://www.insideedition.com/hong-kong ... reak-72625

Hampster now to blame as covid carriers.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:26 pm
by Long slender neck
Just the 464k infections in France today

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 10:28 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:26 pm Just the 464k infections in France today
Should be fun when all the Ski C#nts pop over there in 3 weeks time.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:59 pm
by Story of O
No more plan B from next week. Mask wearing to end and covid passports not needed.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:34 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
And people with covid no longer legally need to isolate..which seems mental

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:44 pm
by Story of O
They are keeping that at least until March

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:49 pm
by George M
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:34 pm And people with covid no longer legally need to isolate..which seems mental
I thought you would have realised by now. Omicron was no more threatening than a common cold. You can’t disrupt the country every time a mild variant like this appears.
However , I am assuming they also have good news information about Delta , or they are satisfied that enough of us have been vaccinated to remove the need for isolation

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 7:54 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
George M wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:49 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:34 pm And people with covid no longer legally need to isolate..which seems mental
I thought you would have realised by now. Omicron was no more threatening than a common cold. You can’t disrupt the country every time a mild variant like this appears.
However , I am assuming they also have good news information about Delta , or they are satisfied that enough of us have been vaccinated to remove the need for isolation
Or Johnson is trying to appease the backbenchers he may need to rely on to keep his job?

Whatever your view, non of the last 6 months has been 'based on the science'.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 8:30 am
by George M
Apple Wumble wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 7:54 am
George M wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:49 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:34 pm And people with covid no longer legally need to isolate..which seems mental
I thought you would have realised by now. Omicron was no more threatening than a common cold. You can’t disrupt the country every time a mild variant like this appears.
However , I am assuming they also have good news information about Delta , or they are satisfied that enough of us have been vaccinated to remove the need for isolation
Or Johnson is trying to appease the backbenchers he may need to rely on to keep his job?

Whatever your view, non of the last 6 months has been 'based on the science'.
On that , I think we can agree

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:03 am
by Long slender neck
Still 100k infections a day, but hey remove those restrictions because Big Dog needs a boost in the polls.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:25 am
by George M
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:03 am Still 100k infections a day, but hey remove those restrictions because Big Dog needs a boost in the polls.
I am sure that’s what’s going through everyone’s mind.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:31 pm
by Long slender neck
107k new cases. Has the drop in infections plateaued?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:40 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:31 pm 107k new cases. Has the drop in infections plateaued?
Think regional surges are keeping it high.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:50 pm
by BoniO
George M wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:25 am
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:03 am Still 100k infections a day, but hey remove those restrictions because Big Dog needs a boost in the polls.
I am sure that’s what’s going through everyone’s mind.
Probably only the intelligent ones.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:03 pm
by George M
Looking at those COVID figures throws up more interesting facts , and if I may say , even slightly humorous.
The average age COVID death through the pandemic was 82.5 years old. The average life expectancy in the Uk is lower than that. Turns out it would have been better to catch it ))

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 6:30 pm
by Story of O
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:31 pm 107k new cases. Has the drop in infections plateaued?
7 day average still going down

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 7:29 pm
by tuffers#1
Story of O wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 6:30 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:31 pm 107k new cases. Has the drop in infections plateaued?
7 day average still going down
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/conf ... st-results
Confirmatory PCR tests to be temporarily suspended for positive lateral flow test results

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:04 pm
by Long slender neck
Need those positive test numbers to go down? Just make it difficult for people to test.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:21 pm
by BoniO
Yup - that’ll do it!

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:48 pm
by Thor
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:03 am Still 100k infections a day, but hey remove those restrictions because Big Dog needs a boost in the polls.
Or are the large number being attributed to people actually having flu and or a common cold which the tests can’t separate or identify against? The narrative is failing that’s for sure.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:51 pm
by Thor
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:04 pm Need those positive test numbers to go down? Just make it difficult for people to test.
Non symptomatic people shouldn’t be testing anyway, but sh*t loads are and many false positives are being thrown out there. Also a booster could show up as a positive test.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:59 pm
by Long slender neck
Thor wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:48 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:03 am Still 100k infections a day, but hey remove those restrictions because Big Dog needs a boost in the polls.
Or are the large number being attributed to people actually having flu and or a common cold which the tests can’t separate or identify against? The narrative is failing that’s for sure.
That sounds like bollox. Evidence?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:01 pm
by Long slender neck
Thor wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:51 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:04 pm Need those positive test numbers to go down? Just make it difficult for people to test.
Non symptomatic people shouldn’t be testing anyway, but sh*t loads are and many false positives are being thrown out there. Also a booster could show up as a positive test.
More rubbish.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:13 pm
by BoniO
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:01 pm
Thor wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:51 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:04 pm Need those positive test numbers to go down? Just make it difficult for people to test.
Non symptomatic people shouldn’t be testing anyway, but sh*t loads are and many false positives are being thrown out there. Also a booster could show up as a positive test.
More rubbish.
Well it is his speciality subject.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:58 am
by faldO
If you want a more accurate picture of what is going on in terms of infection check the ONS Infection Survey (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulation ... usReleases). It's updated each week but lags a bit.

"Experts have warned" that the numbers on the govt site are becoming increasingly unreliable and some also believe daily coronavirus statistics should be phased out in the coming months, amid fears people are becoming "addicted" to the figures.