Page 335 of 342
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:42 pm
by George M
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:39 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:15 pm
BoniO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:09 pm
So you have no way of proving the rubbish you posted as we both knew. Your credibility was already in the crapper mate but I think most people have got you totally sussed by now. Posts crap - supplies no evidence to support said crap. But al least your consistency is superb - well done!
Thanks for that. I will sleep so much better knowing I have your disapproval. Just back from Spain. No testing required so free to spread the next variant around London
Weird post
People need to calm done and recognise tongue in cheek humour sometimes. Not enough of it on here. Opposing views are jumped on and insults aimed at the contributors
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:44 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:28 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:06 pm
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
Even the NHS has said that around 50% of admissions are people without symptoms coming in for other reasons. This suggests that actual deaths from covid are significantly lower.
It would be good for the true breakdowns to be given. It is pointless having someone dying from an accident and being put down as a covid death.
Got a link to the 50% figure? Because I'm not sure I believe it
In any case admission and death stats aren't the same anyway
Maybe the fact that restrictions in England have not been increased is a clue.
The 50% has been covered in MSM. The earlier figures were 80% of admissions, but that was not picked up by MSM.
Then they should be easy for you find and post on here
Thanks
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:00 pm
by BoniO
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:42 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:39 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:15 pm
Thanks for that. I will sleep so much better knowing I have your disapproval. Just back from Spain. No testing required so free to spread the next variant around London
Weird post
People need to calm done and recognise tongue in cheek humour sometimes. Not enough of it on here. Opposing views are jumped on and insults aimed at the contributors
Could you please highlight your “tongue in cheek” crap as opposed to your “serious” crap as this will help us all to distinguish one from t’other and prevent confusion. TIA.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:01 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:42 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:39 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:15 pm
Thanks for that. I will sleep so much better knowing I have your disapproval. Just back from Spain. No testing required so free to spread the next variant around London
Weird post
People need to calm done and recognise tongue in cheek humour sometimes. Not enough of it on here. Opposing views are jumped on and insults aimed at the contributors
Very cheeky to joke about willingly spreading something that kills people.
I agree that opposing views are jumped on, especially around covid, but if you want that freedom of speech you need to be prepared to accept being called out for something wrong or insulting.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:06 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:00 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:42 pm
People need to calm done and recognise tongue in cheek humour sometimes. Not enough of it on here. Opposing views are jumped on and insults aimed at the contributors
Could you please highlight your “tongue in cheek” crap as opposed to your “serious” crap as this will help us all to distinguish one from t’other and prevent confusion. TIA.
That just about proves my point. It’s valid if you say it , crap if I do.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:11 pm
by Story of O
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:44 pm
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:28 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:06 pm
Got a link to the 50% figure? Because I'm not sure I believe it
In any case admission and death stats aren't the same anyway
Maybe the fact that restrictions in England have not been increased is a clue.
The 50% has been covered in MSM. The earlier figures were 80% of admissions, but that was not picked up by MSM.
Then they should be easy for you find and post on here
Thanks
This is New York, but I suppose the principle is the same
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-n ... -rcna11247
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:43 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Story of O wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:11 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:44 pm
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:28 pm
Maybe the fact that restrictions in England have not been increased is a clue.
The 50% has been covered in MSM. The earlier figures were 80% of admissions, but that was not picked up by MSM.
Then they should be easy for you find and post on here
Thanks
This is New York, but I suppose the principle is the same
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-n ... -rcna11247
I mean other than the fact it's a different country in a different continent with a different healthcare system and a different population demographic with different levels of transmission then yeah, the same
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 6:17 pm
by Story of O
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:53 pm
by Thor
This when the government changed it due to the over calculation of the death numbers.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new- ... -19-deaths
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:06 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The government admitted about a year ago a quarter of all deaths was not from covid, please keep up tuffers dear boy. If your going to spout crap at least let it be good crap
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk , just click deaths left margin of page .28 day test figure 150k , 170k+ other figure ! glad i could help
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:09 pm
by tuffers#1
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:01 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:42 pm
People need to calm done and recognise tongue in cheek humour sometimes. Not enough of it on here. Opposing views are jumped on and insults aimed at the contributors
Very cheeky to joke about willingly spreading something that kills people.
I agree that opposing views are jumped on, especially around covid, but if you want that freedom of speech you need to be prepared to accept being called out for something wrong or insulting.
Sums this peculiar alias up !
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:12 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:50 am
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:14 am
The economy didn’t suffer so badly because, for the most part , they did the right things. Not locking down every time Labour whiners said they should. Not locking down with this variant has done the reverse of what you say. It has saved the economy.
The people in the 5th biggest economy are under huge financial strain because of the story parties inepitudes ! underfunding ppe , whilst they line there own pockets. Filthy sc#m !
Can you show me some proof of that claim?
Tory watch THORBYN,Iknow you get scared going that thread , but its all there !
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:16 pm
by tuffers#1
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk , click deaths 150k with a 28 day test , 173k with it on death certificate .
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:23 pm
by Story of O
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:06 pm
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The government admitted about a year ago a quarter of all deaths was not from covid, please keep up tuffers dear boy. If your going to spout crap at least let it be good crap
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk , just click deaths left margin of page .28 day test figure 150k , 170k+ other figure ! glad i could help
Why the difference in numbers? Serious question as I have never understood it.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:45 pm
by tuffers#1
Story of O wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:23 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:06 pm
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
The government admitted about a year ago a quarter of all deaths was not from covid, please keep up tuffers dear boy. If your going to spout crap at least let it be good crap
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk , just click deaths left margin of page .28 day test figure 150k , 170k+ other figure ! glad i could help
Why the difference in numbers? Serious question as I have never understood it.
i suppose its those who died initially when there was no testing & the those who died at home thinking ill call an ambulance tomorrow who never got to wake up . were lots who didnt think they were that ill . thats my thoughts not facts .Thor may tell you about people being knocked down & stuff .He is the conspiracy expert round here .
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:02 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
So 50% was a lie, thanks for proving my point
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:06 pm
by tuffers#1
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm
Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
Its rather rude to think someone that wealthy wouldnt have a coutts account let alone a regular bank account !
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:09 pm
by Story of O
I googled it and if I read it right, the additional numbers are deaths where the person had Covid but it was not the cause of death.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:23 pm
by tuffers#1
Story of O wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:09 pm
I googled it and if I read it right, the additional numbers are deaths where the person had Covid but it was not the cause of death.
death certificates have cause of death & secondary cause of death. as an example of such a case then look at the pregnant women or asthma sufferers covid would be listed & secondary would be asthma or pregnancy . underlying health issues. The virus may have then caused heart failure etc that would kill them. all still caused by the underlying health problem originally
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:11 am
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:12 pm
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:50 am
The people in the 5th biggest economy are under huge financial strain because of the story parties inepitudes ! underfunding ppe , whilst they line there own pockets. Filthy sc#m !
Can you show me some proof of that claim?
Tory watch THORBYN,Iknow you get scared going that thread , but its all there !
So no proof then? So your talking crap as usual then?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:13 am
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:06 pm
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm
Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
Its rather rude to think someone that wealthy wouldnt have a coutts account let alone a regular bank account !
You don't need that much to have a courts bank account.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 1:15 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Ikea cuts sick pay of some unvaccinated staff
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59930206
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 1:18 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:13 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:06 pm
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm
Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
Its rather rude to think someone that wealthy wouldnt have a coutts account let alone a regular bank account !
You don't need that much to have a courts bank account.
When did you get yours,Thor?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 3:32 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:11 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:12 pm
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
Can you show me some proof of that claim?
Tory watch THORBYN,Iknow you get scared going that thread , but its all there !
So no proof then? So your talking crap as usual then?
150 k dead thorbs. read exactly what i wrote originally.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 3:35 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:13 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:06 pm
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm
Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
Its rather rude to think someone that wealthy wouldnt have a coutts account let alone a regular bank account !
You don't need that much to have a courts bank account.
what about a coutts one ?
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk click link click deaths !!