Page 334 of 342

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:07 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
If his salary is 10.4 million then he’s ‘donating’ about 4.5 million to fund the nhs, benefits, etc…

Or maybe he should pay more out of his pocket, like I’m sure you do rather than the government who’s job it is?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm
by BoniO
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am 150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:39 pm
by B.whitehouse+10more
Apple Wumble wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:07 pm
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
If his salary is 10.4 million then he’s ‘donating’ about 4.5 million to fund the nhs, benefits, etc…

Or maybe he should pay more out of his pocket, like I’m sure you do rather than the government who’s job it is?
Donating? 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:49 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am 150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.
After 2 years of this complete shitshow, it’s all the Tory sycophants have left. Sad.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:21 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:39 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:07 pm
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
If his salary is 10.4 million then he’s ‘donating’ about 4.5 million to fund the nhs, benefits, etc…

Or maybe he should pay more out of his pocket, like I’m sure you do rather than the government who’s job it is?
Donating? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Avoiding the question. Let’s leave it there as this is a covid thread. You don’t post often, but when you do the quality is extremely low, please try harder.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:24 pm
by B.whitehouse+10more
Apple Wumble wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:21 pm
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:39 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:07 pm

If his salary is 10.4 million then he’s ‘donating’ about 4.5 million to fund the nhs, benefits, etc…

Or maybe he should pay more out of his pocket, like I’m sure you do rather than the government who’s job it is?
Donating? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Avoiding the question. Let’s leave it there as this is a covid thread. You don’t post often, but when you do the quality is extremely low, please try harder.


Have a great day :D

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am 150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The government admitted about a year ago a quarter of all deaths was not from covid, please keep up tuffers dear boy. If your going to spout crap at least let it be good crap

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:50 am
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:14 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am 150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The economy didn’t suffer so badly because, for the most part , they did the right things. Not locking down every time Labour whiners said they should. Not locking down with this variant has done the reverse of what you say. It has saved the economy.
The people in the 5th biggest economy are under huge financial strain because of the story parties inepitudes ! underfunding ppe , whilst they line there own pockets. Filthy sc#m !
Can you show me some proof of that claim?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:28 pm
by Long slender neck
Thor wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am 150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The government admitted about a year ago a quarter of all deaths was not from covid, please keep up tuffers dear boy. If your going to spout crap at least let it be good crap
Prove it.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:30 pm
by Story of O
Google it

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:53 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
If you’re going to spout nonsense, the onus is on you to prove it, not make others disprove it.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:53 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
That way, religion lies.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:59 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:55 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:28 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:44 am

Got a link to this one?
Looking for it now
Google "bullshit bantz about Labour" or "Internet Bollox for Dummies"
And the usual internet bollox by you . Keep trying

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:01 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am 150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.
Total moron. Keep bullying though. Eventually everyone will leave and it will be left to the sad left.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:03 pm
by George M
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:49 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am

If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.
After 2 years of this complete shitshow, it’s all the Tory sycophants have left. Sad.
Looking forward to the next Tory term in power.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:04 pm
by BoniO
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:01 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am

If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.
Total moron. Keep bullying though. Eventually everyone will leave and it will be left to the sad left.
So you can prove that we'd all be "dead or out of work or homeless" then. OK - let's have it.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:04 pm
by George M
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:03 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:49 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm

Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.
After 2 years of this complete shitshow, it’s all the Tory sycophants have left. Sad.
Looking forward to the next Tory term in power.
Your so called 2 year shitshow would still beat your 2 year sh*t show. Most of your posts prove that

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:05 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:04 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:01 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:08 pm

Even compared to the reliably stupid and ignorant statements you make this one is a doozy. 100% unprovable but that's what we expect from you to be honest. What a waste of space.
Total moron. Keep bullying though. Eventually everyone will leave and it will be left to the sad left.
So you can prove that we'd all be "dead or out of work or homeless" then. OK - let's have it.
Luckily i will never have to. Labour will never get the chance

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:09 pm
by BoniO
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:05 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:04 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:01 pm

Total moron. Keep bullying though. Eventually everyone will leave and it will be left to the sad left.
So you can prove that we'd all be "dead or out of work or homeless" then. OK - let's have it.
Luckily i will never have to. Labour will never get the chance
So you have no way of proving the rubbish you posted as we both knew. Your credibility was already in the crapper mate but I think most people have got you totally sussed by now. Posts crap - supplies no evidence to support said crap. But al least your consistency is superb - well done!

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:15 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:09 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:05 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:04 pm

So you can prove that we'd all be "dead or out of work or homeless" then. OK - let's have it.
Luckily i will never have to. Labour will never get the chance
So you have no way of proving the rubbish you posted as we both knew. Your credibility was already in the crapper mate but I think most people have got you totally sussed by now. Posts crap - supplies no evidence to support said crap. But al least your consistency is superb - well done!
Thanks for that. I will sleep so much better knowing I have your disapproval. Just back from Spain. No testing required so free to spread the next variant around London

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:22 pm
by BoniO
Thor wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:50 am
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:14 am

The economy didn’t suffer so badly because, for the most part , they did the right things. Not locking down every time Labour whiners said they should. Not locking down with this variant has done the reverse of what you say. It has saved the economy.
The people in the 5th biggest economy are under huge financial strain because of the story parties inepitudes ! underfunding ppe , whilst they line there own pockets. Filthy sc#m !
Can you show me some proof of that claim?
To paraphrase your good self - Wake Up! If you look back over this thread there is plenty of proof of the Governments ineptitude. Now stop being a lazy sausage and go and look.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:23 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:22 pm
Thor wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 3:19 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:50 am

The people in the 5th biggest economy are under huge financial strain because of the story parties inepitudes ! underfunding ppe , whilst they line there own pockets. Filthy sc#m !
Can you show me some proof of that claim?
To paraphrase your good self - Wake Up! If you look back over this thread there is plenty of proof of the Governments ineptitude. Now stop being a lazy sausage and go and look.
There is proof of ineptitude but not that our economy is under huge financial strain

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:28 pm
by Still's Carenae
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:06 pm
Still's Carenae wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:07 pm Deaths starting to pick up :(

Image
Even the NHS has said that around 50% of admissions are people without symptoms coming in for other reasons. This suggests that actual deaths from covid are significantly lower.

It would be good for the true breakdowns to be given. It is pointless having someone dying from an accident and being put down as a covid death.
Got a link to the 50% figure? Because I'm not sure I believe it

In any case admission and death stats aren't the same anyway
Maybe the fact that restrictions in England have not been increased is a clue.

The 50% has been covered in MSM. The earlier figures were 80% of admissions, but that was not picked up by MSM.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:39 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:15 pm
BoniO wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:09 pm
George M wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:05 pm

Luckily i will never have to. Labour will never get the chance
So you have no way of proving the rubbish you posted as we both knew. Your credibility was already in the crapper mate but I think most people have got you totally sussed by now. Posts crap - supplies no evidence to support said crap. But al least your consistency is superb - well done!
Thanks for that. I will sleep so much better knowing I have your disapproval. Just back from Spain. No testing required so free to spread the next variant around London
Weird post

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:42 pm
by faldO
Still's Carenae wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 4:28 pm The 50% has been covered in MSM. The earlier figures were 80% of admissions, but that was not picked up by MSM.
It's never been anywhere near 80%, regardless of whether that's been picked up by the MSM. If it was 80% there's plenty of people out there who would jump on that number.

Recently it's been around 30% - 40%, according to the NHS's' own figures (https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/s ... -activity/) and that has been widely reported.