Page 333 of 342
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
by Still's Carenae
Even the NHS has said that around 50% of admissions are people without symptoms coming in for other reasons. This suggests that actual deaths from covid are significantly lower.
It would be good for the true breakdowns to be given. It is pointless having someone dying from an accident and being put down as a covid death.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:52 pm
by Thor
Hospitalisations down 31% week on week
Cases down 18.5% week on week
The end of this virus is nigh.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:53 pm
by Thor
I see our brothers and sisters in Scotland are marching for freedom. Good for them.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:59 pm
by Thor
The Germans, Austrians and French have marched as well today. Dummies.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:06 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
Even the NHS has said that around 50% of admissions are people without symptoms coming in for other reasons. This suggests that actual deaths from covid are significantly lower.
It would be good for the true breakdowns to be given. It is pointless having someone dying from an accident and being put down as a covid death.
Got a link to the 50% figure? Because I'm not sure I believe it
In any case admission and death stats aren't the same anyway
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:33 pm
by tuffers#1
with a need to vaccinate some 7-8 billion people this pandemic has legs yet
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:23 pm
by George M
BoniO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:07 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:40 pm
BoniO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:28 pm
I'm starting to think that George may have been talking out of his a**s.
Only just starting?
Haha - somewhat tongue in cheek from me - he’s been talking sh-ite for ages (my apology to sh-ite)
Hilarious. Still not adding much. Come back when this is over and apologise . In the meantime, keep up the childish insults. I will need therapy soon
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:52 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
I'm surprised George is such a Tory despite his fascination with getting publicly owned
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:56 pm
by George M
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:52 pm
I'm surprised George is such a Tory despite his fascination with getting publicly owned
More hilarity from the league table doom master. You should start a comedy club.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:36 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:51 pm
by Dohnut
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:06 pm
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
Even the NHS has said that around 50% of admissions are people without symptoms coming in for other reasons. This suggests that actual deaths from covid are significantly lower.
It would be good for the true breakdowns to be given. It is pointless having someone dying from an accident and being put down as a covid death.
Got a link to the 50% figure? Because I'm not sure I believe it
In any case admission and death stats aren't the same anyway
The BBC reported the figure at 30% and that related to admissions. Will be on their site somewhere. No idea of their source but in all honesty it’s seem reasonable. Inevitable that with Omicron people who go to hospital with other issues may have Covid and not be aware until tested.
Reasonable to assume it applies to deaths too, always has. A neighbour of mine over a year ago went to hospital after a stroke, whilst in hospital he suffered a heart attack. It transpired he caught Covid. I’d be surprised if that’s what killed him. In the early days of Covid several stories like this emerged.
I’m not too sure a precise breakdown is possible.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
by tuffers#1
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:14 am
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The economy didn’t suffer so badly because, for the most part , they did the right things. Not locking down every time Labour whiners said they should. Not locking down with this variant has done the reverse of what you say. It has saved the economy.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:18 am
by George M
Dohnut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:51 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:06 pm
Still's Carenae wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
Even the NHS has said that around 50% of admissions are people without symptoms coming in for other reasons. This suggests that actual deaths from covid are significantly lower.
It would be good for the true breakdowns to be given. It is pointless having someone dying from an accident and being put down as a covid death.
Got a link to the 50% figure? Because I'm not sure I believe it
In any case admission and death stats aren't the same anyway
The BBC reported the figure at 30% and that related to admissions. Will be on their site somewhere. No idea of their source but in all honesty it’s seem reasonable. Inevitable that with Omicron people who go to hospital with other issues may have Covid and not be aware until tested.
Reasonable to assume it applies to deaths too, always has. A neighbour of mine over a year ago went to hospital after a stroke, whilst in hospital he suffered a heart attack. It transpired he caught Covid. I’d be surprised if that’s what killed him. In the early days of Covid several stories like this emerged.
I’m not too sure a precise breakdown is possible.
Exactly this. Ask Currywurst to give us a breakdown of current deaths. Percentage of Delta / Omicron , vaccinated/ unvaccinated, Deaths with Omicron / as a result of Omicron.
It’s all well and good posting death rates for effect but they are meaningless. We all know what the totals are everyday. They are on the BBC. Tell us something we don’t know.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:44 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Got a link to this one?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:28 am
by George M
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:44 am
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Got a link to this one?
Looking for it now
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:09 am
by Max B Gold
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Agreed.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:50 am
by tuffers#1
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:14 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
The economy didn’t suffer so badly because, for the most part , they did the right things. Not locking down every time Labour whiners said they should. Not locking down with this variant has done the reverse of what you say. It has saved the economy.
The people in the 5th biggest economy are under huge financial strain because of the story parties inepitudes ! underfunding ppe , whilst they line there own pockets. Filthy sc#m !
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:55 am
by tuffers#1
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:28 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:44 am
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Got a link to this one?
Looking for it now
is it under marcus rashford ?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:58 am
by tuffers#1
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:38 am
150,000 deaths in the uk more likely to be 180,000. shockig how the story party let the 5th biggest economy , suffer so badly .
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
can you not answer a post in 1 attempt ?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:58 am
by B.whitehouse+10more
The only thing under Marcus Rashford is a mattress stuffed full of cash
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:22 pm
by tuffers#1
B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:58 am
The only thing under Marcus Rashford is a mattress stuffed full of cash
Rather rude of you !
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:47 pm
by B.whitehouse+10more
Why’s that ? His salary per annum is 10.4 million, whilst he has been doing his “ charity “ work since august last year he has played 759 minutes of football equivalent of £6800 per minute during the last 6 months. Just think if he gave up 1 hour of his salary he could feed all the kids in Manchester for a year, however his mattress would be a bit lumpy till the next hour.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:55 pm
by BoniO
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:28 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:44 am
George M wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:20 am
If Stammerer had been in power , we would all be dead or out of work and homeless. Count your blessings.
Got a link to this one?
Looking for it now
Google "bullshit bantz about Labour" or "Internet Bollox for Dummies"
