Page 4 of 6
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:31 pm
by Dunners
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:24 pm
Dunners wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:23 pm
He's just following the usual pattern he used to display on here after he'd go OFF on one. There would follow a subdued period, but it would always give way to increasing escalations of OFFence.
Yeah, but he'd disappear from here while he was stewing. The fact he's not going OFF at games might be a sign that he has finally learned his lesson.
Nah, he never disappeared from here. He'd just lurk and avoid posting for a bit. But eventually he'd be unable to hold back and would dip back in. All very pleasant at first, but with some expert prodding he'd always break cover eventually.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 9:55 pm
by spen666
Could he not do a job on the pitch? A decent left winger perhaps
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:20 am
by tuffers#1
wonder if Col U stewards or gabbers have his image on the board of known trouble makers
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:18 am
by Lifelongfan
He bottled out of Colchester unless they barred him?
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:41 am
by Bluecap
This is now getting a bit out of hand.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:43 am
by The Mindsweep
This thread deserves to be frozen now please admins
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:11 am
by Dunners
Agreed. This just diminishes our chances of enticing him back.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:21 am
by spen666
Lifelongfan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:18 am
He bottled out of Colchester unless they barred him?
If he chose not to go to Colchester, then those who slate him for his antics at home games, should be acknowledging the sensible decision he made for this game.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:25 am
by Chief crazy horse
Sensible?
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:28 am
by spen666
Sensible, yes - avoiding putting himself in a situation where there was a real risk of confrontaion and potential reprisals.
Taking decision not to be at game de-escalates the risks, so yes, a sensible decision - assuming he decided not to go
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:30 am
by Dunners
spen666 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:28 am
Sensible, yes - avoiding putting himself in a situation where there was a real risk of confrontaion and potential reprisals.
Taking decision not to be at game de-escalates the risks, so yes, a sensible decision - assuming he decided not to go
We need to get you on the phone to Putin now!
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:31 am
by Long slender neck
Think he's a bit sore about it still, he keeps mentioning it on Twitter. Maybe theres a part of him that enjoyed the attention?
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:38 am
by Dunners
I can't help feeling that he never really got a proper chance to tell his side of the story. Sure, there was the statement, the posts on Twitter, comments on the STFU Orient page on Facebook, and support from LOFT. But it's undoubtable that his fine reputation has been tarnished to some degree, as people will always be inclined to think that there's no smoke without fire. And that is unfair.
I just hope that one day he gets the chance to set the record straight, and everyone has the courtesy to give him a fair hearing. After all those years of passionate support, it's the least he deserves.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:05 pm
by HARVEY T DENTON
Probably signed an NDA, sure it'll all come out one day.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:09 pm
by Long slender neck
Anyone know if he runs with the OTF? Or seen him clap or boo The Knee?
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:15 pm
by Chief crazy horse
spen666 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:28 am
Sensible, yes - avoiding putting himself in a situation where there was a real risk of confrontaion and potential reprisals.
Taking decision not to be at game de-escalates the risks, so yes, a sensible decision - assuming he decided not to go
I think you've missed seeing what I'm getting at..
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:16 pm
by Max B Gold
All of us are taking the night off," Wrath said abruptly. "We need some regroup time."
Rhage snorted from across the table. "You're not going to make us play Fan Rep of Fury again, are you?"
"Yup." A collective groan rose up from the Brotherhood, one that Wrath ignored. "Right after dinner" he shouted at the top of his voice for all to hear.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:32 pm
by Lifelongfan
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:09 pm
Anyone know if he runs with the OTF? Or seen him clap or boo The Knee?
No his clothing clobber not good enough to be OTF
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:05 pm
by Chocolate_brownie
spen666 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:28 am
Sensible, yes - avoiding putting himself in a situation where there was a real risk of confrontaion and potential reprisals.
Taking decision not to be at game de-escalates the risks, so yes, a sensible decision - assuming he decided not to go
Not being an abusive bell end isn’t something people should be praised for. It should be default behaviour.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:31 pm
by tuffers#1
Lifelongfan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:32 pm
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:09 pm
Anyone know if he runs with the OTF? Or seen him clap or boo The Knee?
No his clothing clobber not good enough to be OTF
There.clothing is/was hardly high end
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:11 pm
by Max B Gold
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:31 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:32 pm
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:09 pm
Anyone know if he runs with the OTF? Or seen him clap or boo The Knee?
No his clothing clobber not good enough to be OTF
There.clothing is/was hardly high end
True, but does it have to be when it looks so cool?
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:41 pm
by tuffers#1
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:11 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:31 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:32 pm
No his clothing clobber not good enough to be OTF
There.clothing is/was hardly high end
True, but does it have to be when it looks so cool?
stone island is not cool ! when i see them wearin Brunello Cucinelli & Maison Margiela or Belstaff with there faux hooligan posturing ill believe there cool !
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:17 pm
by Chocolate_brownie
Anyone in the JE stand have an update from today?
Stevenage only had a couple of non-white players so I guess it was just amber alert today.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:55 pm
by RealLoughtonO
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:38 am
I can't help feeling that he never really got a proper chance to tell his side of the story. Sure, there was the statement, the posts on Twitter, comments on the STFU Orient page on Facebook, and support from LOFT. But it's undoubtable that his fine reputation has been tarnished to some degree, as people will always be inclined to think that there's no smoke without fire. And that is unfair.
I just hope that one day he gets the chance to set the record straight, and everyone has the courtesy to give him a fair hearing. After all those years of passionate support, it's the least he deserves.
Too obvious
need to do better than that.
Re: R***r watch
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 8:41 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
How is he still allowed to walk around the whole ground after what happened?
need to do better than that.