Independent Leyton Orient Forum

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:20 pm Prince Andrew reckoning he doesn’t sweat. Just seen a photo of him on the news from years ago in a night club ,sweating his cobs off. What’s that old saying “When you’re in a hole, stop digging .”

He will deny it saying it was raining, or a spilt drink. Maybe he just washed his heir.

I believed him when he said he doesn't sweat, we've got a squad of players who don't sweat either.

Article_50 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 1:17 pm I believed him when he said he doesn't sweat, we've got a squad of players who don't sweat either.

I think the real problem here is Andrew sweats more than the players do . His sweating problem should be cured though under interrogation by the FBI

Could we do a swap for Anne Sacoolas?

Nothing to see here, he's part of the elite and he will be covered by his mates.

His excuse is the pits.

Constanza wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 3:31 pm His excuse is the pits.

But not sweaty arm pits.

Mind you, only 2 of those have ever knowingly had a memorable pizza moment...

He's actually considering doing a second interview.

Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 2:06 pm He's actually considering doing a second interview.

Tell him not to sweat the small stuff

Just been 'relieved of his duties' i.e. sacked

LeytonOstone wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:27 pm Just been 'relieved of his duties' i.e. sacked

After a chat with HM no doubt. A bit of integrity is restored.

Wrong un in my opinion .

dOh Nut wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:40 pm

LeytonOstone wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:27 pm Just been 'relieved of his duties' i.e. sacked

After a chat with HM no doubt. A bit of integrity is restored.

Integrity?

This bunch of inbred parasites don’t know the meaning of the word.

I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!

The Queen has always been savvy enough to take the right advice when managing her public image. She's from a generation that knew the fear of revolution and republicanism.

But her children and grandchildren are more prone to take their parasitic privileges for granted. Andrew's whole approach has given away his disregard and contempt for the commoners. He genuinely have believed we'd believe him.

And it's interesting to watch the MSM increasingly turn hostile towards Harry. His stepping into politicised issues is a breach of the unspoken agreement between the people and the monarchy. Her Maj must be worried.

Dunners wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:49 am The Queen has always been savvy enough to take the right advice

*cough* Boris *cough*

West Side Story wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:34 am I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!

If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.

However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.

Just read that the ex consul general in New York has said I don’t remember him staying with me in respect to the sex allegation trip. Oh dear.

Its his poor mum I'm concerned about. She must be out of her head with worry wondering what her son has been up to.

I bet hardly a day goes by when she wonders if it would have been so much better if an Argie missile had blown his helicopter to smithereens way back then.

Thor wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 10:02 am

West Side Story wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:34 am I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!

If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.

However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.

How far under the age limit are you allowed to go Thor, before you consider someone to be a paedo?

Interesting question, RedO. By my reckoning:
16 and above = good paedo
15 and under = bad paedo

Appreciate that the threshold is up for debate, so happy to be put right on any points I am unsure of.

Oh, and for the avoidance of doubt, 15 years, 11 months and 28 days is still a bad paedo. The line must be drawn somewhere.

What about if the 15 year old is 'developed' ?

RedO wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:22 am What about if the 15 year old is 'developed' ?

Didn't we used to have an expert on this sort of sordid goings on right here on the MB. Probably best if we get him involved.