Page 4 of 4
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:49 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
I’m really pleased the good percentage has gone up, my lone good vote was looking sad for some time. Maybe he is winning people over.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:51 pm
by Norman_S_ Fletcher
Course he's the one. After all he's family!
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:54 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:47 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:31 pm
UpminsterO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:15 pm
Max if you are in the other country stuck to England do you not have any sense of humour up there
Oh dear. Humour fail coupled to anti Scotchness.
There is more than one country stuck to Englandshire so Scotland cannot be the other one.
as only Wales and Scotland are stuck to England and Wales is a principality not a country.....
According to the list of Sovereign states, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and wales are recorded as constituent Countries of the United Kingdom.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:00 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:51 pm
Course he's the one. After all he's family!
What an arse you are.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9faab/9faab2fdf02f55b8ff7a9c4e603cfcc58763eaf7" alt="Laughing :lol:"
I’d cut that very picture ready to upload and replace my artful dodger, though wasn’t going to change my name.
Well done.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:12 pm
by spen666
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:54 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:47 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:31 pm
Oh dear. Humour fail coupled to anti Scotchness.
There is more than one country stuck to Englandshire so Scotland cannot be the other one.
as only Wales and Scotland are stuck to England and Wales is a principality not a country.....
According to the list of Sovereign states, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and wales are recorded as constituent Countries of the United Kingdom.
doesn't make it correct, just because a random place posts a list
Try reading the legislation starting with "Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542"
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:36 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:12 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:54 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:47 pm
as only Wales and Scotland are stuck to England and Wales is a principality not a country.....
According to the list of Sovereign states, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and wales are recorded as constituent Countries of the United Kingdom.
doesn't make it correct, just because a random place posts a list
Try reading the legislation starting with "Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542"
Maybe the international community views it differently than local legislation. They are entitled to an opinion.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:59 pm
by spen666
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:36 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:12 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:54 pm
According to the list of Sovereign states, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and wales are recorded as constituent Countries of the United Kingdom.
doesn't make it correct, just because a random place posts a list
Try reading the legislation starting with "Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542"
Maybe the international community views it differently than local legislation. They are entitled to an opinion.
law is law.
opinion is exactly that - opinion
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:27 pm
by A Pedant
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:59 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:36 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:12 pm
doesn't make it correct, just because a random place posts a list
Try reading the legislation starting with "Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542"
Maybe the international community views it differently than local legislation. They are entitled to an opinion.
law is law.
opinion is exactly that - opinion
You've quoted the Acts that reunited the two Principalities (no, I didn't know there were two either until I looked it up) and the Marches (likewise) into one country, Wales. Both the UK government and the Welsh Assembly Government refer to Wales as a country in its laws, the Welsh Assembly has also said in the past "Wales is not a Principality. Although we are joined with England by land, and we are part of Great Britain, Wales is a country in its own right."
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:40 pm
by spen666
A Pedant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:27 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:59 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:36 pm
Maybe the international community views it differently than local legislation. They are entitled to an opinion.
law is law.
opinion is exactly that - opinion
You've quoted the Acts that reunited the two Principalities (no, I didn't know there were two either until I looked it up) and the Marches (likewise) into one country, Wales. Both the UK government and the Welsh Assembly Government refer to Wales as a country in its laws, the Welsh Assembly has also said in the past "Wales is not a Principality. Although we are joined with England by land, and we are part of Great Britain, Wales is a country in its own right."
Saying you are a country doesn't make you a country
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:23 pm
by A Pedant
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:40 pm
Saying you are a country doesn't make you a country
Nice ignoring of the fact that the laws you quoted made it a country, and thus it ceased to be a principality.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:29 pm
by spen666
A Pedant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:23 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:40 pm
Saying you are a country doesn't make you a country
Nice ignoring of the fact that the laws you quoted made it a country, and thus it ceased to be a principality.
The laws I quoted did not make it a country.
Check your facts
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:31 pm
by Disoriented
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:29 pm
A Pedant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:23 pm
spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:40 pm
Saying you are a country doesn't make you a country
Nice ignoring of the fact that the laws you quoted made it a country, and thus it ceased to be a principality.
The laws I quoted did not make it a country.
Check your facts
Nothing to do with this thread.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 12:07 pm
by North Stand Dave
Doesn't matter, what people vote, or their opinions,T & T have appointed him & that's that.
Just give the man a chance. Jesus.
Are you Byways in disguise?
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:49 pm
by Disoriented
North Stand Dave wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 12:07 pm
Doesn't matter, what people vote, or their opinions,T & T have appointed him & that's that.
Just give the man a chance. Jesus.
Are you Byways in disguise?
Will expect the North Stand to get firmly behind Carl tomorrow.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:14 pm
by Thor
They don’t have a north stand, the away end is called the Osmond Stand named after Jimmy. I guess you’ll be in the north stand with the ghost kids Redo bangs on about.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 2:43 pm
by Article_50
On the plus side, we may probably get some Bournemouth reserve players on loan
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:39 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
So only 19% of actual people say it was a bad appointment. Using this as a reasonable proxy makes an even bigger mockery of Aylesburyos false claim that 70% of fans on social media think it's a bad appointment.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:08 pm
by Disoriented
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:39 pm
So only 19% of actual people say it was a bad appointment. Using this as a reasonable proxy makes an even bigger mockery of Aylesburyos false claim that 70% of fans on social media think it's a bad appointment.
When did he say that?
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:53 pm
by Kitch’s Magic Toes
Good way to weed out the simpletons. Surprised there are as many as 40 boarders with a brain cell.
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 5:30 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:08 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:39 pm
So only 19% of actual people say it was a bad appointment. Using this as a reasonable proxy makes an even bigger mockery of Aylesburyos false claim that 70% of fans on social media think it's a bad appointment.
When did he say that?
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2022&p=54365#p54365
Re: Carl Fletcher- Good or Bad appointment?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 5:55 pm
by Disoriented