Page 4 of 7

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:08 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Mightynewsman wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm The deal is done his agreed to pastures new. apparently it’s either Peterborough, Wrexham or Wycombe but the deal is done.
Good luck for the future
Mightynewsman wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:06 pm You all laughed but I gave you the news wish him all the best


You spelt Bristol Rovers wrong

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:22 pm
by Brigs
Mightynewsman wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:06 pm You all laughed but I gave you the news wish him all the best
Mightynewsman wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm The deal is done his agreed to pastures new. apparently it’s either Peterborough, Wrexham or Wycombe but the deal is done.
Good luck for the future
You sure?

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:23 pm
by Bergen
Very disappointing news, but not a surprise. Good luck, Ruel.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:27 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:08 pm
Mightynewsman wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm The deal is done his agreed to pastures new. apparently it’s either Peterborough, Wrexham or Wycombe but the deal is done.
Good luck for the future
Mightynewsman wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:06 pm You all laughed but I gave you the news wish him all the best


You spelt Bristol Rovers wrong
Exactly 😁 . Anyway, even a broken clock is right twice a day

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:29 pm
by Bergen

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:31 pm
by Story of O
Bergen wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:29 pm
"But if you had paid me more I would have stayed"

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:35 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
gshaw wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:04 pm https://www.leytonorient.com/news/2024/ ... on-Orient/
we have an agreed budget and wage structure here and it is important for the long-term stability of the club that we stick to that. Myself and all of the footballing staff are aligned on that.
No surprise there, tries to hold the club to ransom each time his contract ends. Glad they've not given in, he's not worth paying through the nose for. Now get someone who wants to be here and preferably can trap a ball and pass it
It’s made it even more interesting to see who our two new strikers are.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:42 pm
by gshaw
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:35 pm
gshaw wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:04 pm https://www.leytonorient.com/news/2024/ ... on-Orient/
we have an agreed budget and wage structure here and it is important for the long-term stability of the club that we stick to that. Myself and all of the footballing staff are aligned on that.
No surprise there, tries to hold the club to ransom each time his contract ends. Glad they've not given in, he's not worth paying through the nose for. Now get someone who wants to be here and preferably can trap a ball and pass it
It’s made it even more interesting to see who our two new strikers are.
We now need 3 (or 2 and Ruel's place goes to a wide player or CAM)

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:44 pm
by Orient Punxx
Story of O wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:31 pm
Bergen wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:29 pm
"But if you had paid me more I would have stayed"
That’s a question that will need answering.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:54 pm
by Mightynewsman
2 Strikers are kids one from Bournemouth

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
by Brigs
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:10 pm
by Long slender neck
Sad.

And boooo

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
by BiggsyMalone
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
He’s not a great finisher. He scores great goals.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
by PKM
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:17 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
BiggsyMalone wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
He’s not a great finisher. He scores great goals.
Sorry, he’s the best finisher at the club (before today)

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:17 pm
by PKM
Difference could be length of contract
Ruel has got himself a 3 year deal with an option of another year on top

https://www.bristolrovers.co.uk/news/i- ... -interview

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:22 pm
by Brigs
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
We rarely had 8172
Plus they had over 10k at home for a 3rd round cup tie.
I can see why Nigel is desperate for a cup run

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:25 pm
by gshaw
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Not necessarily surprising, he was seen by RW as a bench player here so I'm glad we haven't paid first XI wages for him.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:29 pm
by OyinbO
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
More likely he was promised regular starts, and we wouldn't do that. And we'd be right not to.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:30 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Maybe we couldn't afford it because we're buying El-Miz and the money couldn't stretch that far . I'll make my mind up about our transfer activity when the transfer window closes .

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:34 pm
by Brigs
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:30 pm
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm

Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Maybe we couldn't afford it because we're buying El-Miz and the money couldn't stretch that far . I'll make my mind up about our transfer activity when the transfer window closes .
:lol:

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:35 pm
by redintheface
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:17 pm Difference could be length of contract
Ruel has got himself a 3 year deal with an option of another year on top

https://www.bristolrovers.co.uk/news/i- ... -interview
You may be right but the impression I gained from Wellens’ comments on the O’s website was that the club’s wage structure and player budget ( or maybe lack of it?) was a significant factor. RS often flattered to deceive imho and was never a particular favourite of mine but he was our leading goal scorer and can hopefully be replaced satisfactorily.

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:42 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:34 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:30 pm
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm

Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Maybe we couldn't afford it because we're buying El-Miz and the money couldn't stretch that far . I'll make my mind up about our transfer activity when the transfer window closes .
:lol:
Well I think if we sign El-Miz we would have to pay a fee for him . Ipswich took up the option of extending his contract .

Re: Ruel gone

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:48 pm
by MassiveForehead
Feel like it's a sideways moves in terms of teams, but if he gets a longer contract then fine for him. He did a decent service for us without being always prolific.