Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 11:18 am

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 10:48 am Also very handy of her to have three kids by three fathers.
Aside from the handy alliteration, she’s conveniently spread the kids among partners the exact right amount to seem careless while still just about plausible. Three kids by two partners? That’s just not feasible for message board point making, it suggests actual people involved. Four kids from four partners? That’s pushing plausibility (hopefully she keeps her knickers on from now, for boardin’ cred)

Inspector Gaylord back to his very best.

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:02 pm I was talking to my next door neighbour, he’s a funny sort, likes rescuing people. Anyway, got talking to him yesterday and on top of his taxes that he owes, he pays the government an extra £2,600 a month, and specifically says “please allocate this money to recovering/relapsing (delete as appropriate) alcoholics with three kids, that’s £2k for whatever benefits she can get, you know, those benefits that exist for homeowners that total 2k, and £600 just to go into the main pot”

He’s a Forest Green Rovers fan. Anyway, luckily enough he cancels out George’s real person, so maybe we can stick to the data rather than our neighbours anecdotes now

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:10 pm

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:02 pm I was talking to my next door neighbour, he’s a funny sort, likes rescuing people. Anyway, got talking to him yesterday and on top of his taxes that he owes, he pays the government an extra £2,600 a month, and specifically says “please allocate this money to recovering/relapsing (delete as appropriate) alcoholics with three kids, that’s £2k for whatever benefits she can get, you know, those benefits that exist for homeowners that total 2k, and £600 just to go into the main pot”

He’s a Forest Green Rovers fan. Anyway, luckily enough he cancels out George’s real person, so maybe we can stick to the data rather than our neighbours anecdotes now

Have you written to your MP yet?

You need to because Georgie Boy probably has, to support the impoverishment of the disabled and your letter will cancel his out.

George M wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:24 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:10 pm

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:02 pm I was talking to my next door neighbour, he’s a funny sort, likes rescuing people. Anyway, got talking to him yesterday and on top of his taxes that he owes, he pays the government an extra £2,600 a month, and specifically says “please allocate this money to recovering/relapsing (delete as appropriate) alcoholics with three kids, that’s £2k for whatever benefits she can get, you know, those benefits that exist for homeowners that total 2k, and £600 just to go into the main pot”

He’s a Forest Green Rovers fan. Anyway, luckily enough he cancels out George’s real person, so maybe we can stick to the data rather than our neighbours anecdotes now

Have you written to your MP yet?

You need to because Georgie Boy probably has, to support the impoverishment of the disabled and your letter will cancel his out.

And where did I say I support impoverishment of the disabled? I support fair reform if that’s what your government intends.

Dunners wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 6:07 pm Thankfully, fencing and dueling swords are still allowed.

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 7:31 am How can people this thick get into power?

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 7:31 am How can people this thick get into power?

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 9:17 am

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 7:31 am How can people this thick get into power?

Misreading of what happened there. He’s intelligent enough to realise that a big chunk of the population will either believe it, or will adopt it as a belief even though they know it’s bollocks, because it suits them to pretend that the issue is bigger than it actually is

Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 8:58 am Making more things illegal without an uplift in staff in Police/Courts/Prisons etc isn’t much more than a gimmick really

Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 9:52 am

Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 8:58 am Making more things illegal without an uplift in staff in Police/Courts/Prisons etc isn’t much more than a gimmick really

For every problem there is a solution.

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:44 pm Just watched a Garys Economics video and he says Labour will fail because although they're being 'sensible' with the economy they aren't tackling inequality and are making the same mistakes the democrats did. Unless they can halt the slide in living standards they'll lose the next election.

Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:34 am Three children by different fathers.