Labour Watch

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13023
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1072 times
Been thanked: 2936 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:44 am Max’yyy is, I see, already at the “pretend not to understand when a question is designed to scrutinise his own thinking” stage, but to be fair, his own journey from apparent good faith engagement to belligerence and finally to “lol you fell for my joke!” can be measured in minutes rather than weeks
It literally took you months to work out the joke mate.
Mick McQuaid
Fresh Alias
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:38 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 293 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Mick McQuaid »

I haven't actually argued that I 100% agree with the guidance, just that the actual issue has been willfully misrepresented.

The aim of the guidance is to reduce identified disparities that already exist, not introduce them. This seems to have been understood by the vast majority of people who responded to the consultation. Is it now just utter woke nonsense to feel the need to think about that at all?

The letter from the chairman of the sentencing council to Shabana Mahmood explains it much better than I can, and is a quick Google search away (although quite a long read).

The more important point for me is that the sentencing council is independent for very good reasons.

As for not being willing to argue a point to the death on here, Pammy has never knowingly made a sincere comment on here in 20 years and I literally can't keep up with rate of your replies which as a starting point would generally require going through all the things that aren't actually what I've said. I'm afraid, as infuriating as you find it, I'll stick to the occasional comment and snark.
Mick McQuaid
Fresh Alias
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:38 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 293 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Mick McQuaid »

That was a quick delete Pammy.
Mick McQuaid wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 8:41 am That, as you are undoubtedly aware, the purpose of the guidance has nothing to do with two tier justice, and that while the wording could be improved, the furore has been largely manufactured by the right wing press because two tier Kier is something which, in that awful phrase, has cut through.
User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6694
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

Morning MM

I note your change in approach from “It’s not happening” to “It’s happening but here’s why and here’s why the council’s independence is important”.

It’s a shame you didn’t take that approach from the start as we could have had an interesting discussion.

I think you’re right to trust your instincts and limit your posting on the matter.
Post Reply