Page 282 of 342
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:31 pm
by George M
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:56 am
I was talking about the ones that are still going to die because we’re shrugging our shoulders and saying it’s too late to do anything now, just get jabbed and get on with it.
Dead. Past tense
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:33 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:10 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:06 am
What , someone posting the facts that doesn’t suit your arguments. They are not his views . He is simply presenting the scientists views in a way that even you can understand them.
Facts ????
Who is the bloke ?
GB News doctor ?
You really are a fool and you need to read my explanation of him properly.
He is relaying to you the views of the government advisory scientists who you have been following all lockdown. It is their views and advice , not his. Open your eyes
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:35 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:18 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:03 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:35 am
Not for the dead, it doesn’t.
And that’s not very helpful and , as it’s already happened, pretty pointless comment
Is that why the u.s is under stroner restrictions ?
Or why australia & new.zeland are back under tight lockdown controls ?
If numbers start to rise rapidly .
Lockdowns & isolation will continue .
As will testing .
Wrong again. Testing will end , isolation will end , and you won’t know if numbers are rising.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:38 pm
by George M
And the links for you to check where this information comes from are attached to the video. He is not asking for you to believe him. He helps you understand the facts , you can then check their authenticity.
Sooner or later , Tuffers , you will need to trust someone
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:38 pm
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:33 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:10 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:06 am
What , someone posting the facts that doesn’t suit your arguments. They are not his views . He is simply presenting the scientists views in a way that even you can understand them.
Facts ????
Who is the bloke ?
GB News doctor ?
You really are a fool and you need to read my explanation of him properly.
He is relaying to you the views of the government advisory scientists who you have been following all lockdown. It is their views and advice , not his. Open your eyes
So he isnt part of sage then ?
Because that is who we have been following govt &
medical scientific advice from , yet you call me the FOOL .
Georgie Porgie
Give it up now chap
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:39 pm
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:38 pm
And the links for you to check where this information comes from are attached to the video. He is not asking for you to believe him. He helps you understand the facts , you can then check their authenticity.
Sooner or later , Tuffers , you will need to trust someone
I wont trust him
Or the Story Party &
Certainly not you .
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:41 pm
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:35 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:18 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:03 am
And that’s not very helpful and , as it’s already happened, pretty pointless comment
Is that why the u.s is under stroner restrictions ?
Or why australia & new.zeland are back under tight lockdown controls ?
If numbers start to rise rapidly .
Lockdowns & isolation will continue .
As will testing .
Wrong again. Testing will end , isolation will end , and you won’t know if numbers are rising.
Well eventually Humanity will end
The Earth will stop spinning The Universe will no longer exist .
So theoretically this is the only factual comment you have stumbled on
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:49 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:38 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:33 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:10 pm
Facts ????
Who is the bloke ?
GB News doctor ?
You really are a fool and you need to read my explanation of him properly.
He is relaying to you the views of the government advisory scientists who you have been following all lockdown. It is their views and advice , not his. Open your eyes
So he isnt part of sage then ?
Because that is who we have been following govt &
medical scientific advice from , yet you call me the FOOL .
Georgie Porgie
Give it up now chap
I will try one more time as you appear more dense than I first thought. He is passing on to you in simple terms what the scientists who advise the government are saying.
You are so last year
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:55 pm
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:49 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:38 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:33 pm
You really are a fool and you need to read my explanation of him properly.
He is relaying to you the views of the government advisory scientists who you have been following all lockdown. It is their views and advice , not his. Open your eyes
So he isnt part of sage then ?
Because that is who we have been following govt &
medical scientific advice from , yet you call me the FOOL .
Georgie Porgie
Give it up now chap
I will try one more time as you appear more dense than I first thought. He is passing on to you in simple terms what the scientists who advise the government are saying.
You are so last year
Why do i need it in simple terms from him ?
I already understand it in the simplest terms straight from
The scientists the government use .
I do NOT NEED HIS INTERPRETATION .
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:58 pm
by tuffers#1
Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:56 am
Sadly, people die from various things everyday. And while we try to prevent a lot of them we don’t always succeed. We accept and live with this and will eventually have to do the same with covid
No
We find a way to eradicate such easily infectious life threatening diseases
Like Cholera TB Smallpox etc etc
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:35 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:31 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:56 am
I was talking about the ones that are still going to die because we’re shrugging our shoulders and saying it’s too late to do anything now, just get jabbed and get on with it.
Dead. Past tense
I said ‘The dead’.
It’s a noun.
Nouns don’t have tenses, you berk.
Pack it in, Thory.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 3:00 pm
by Story of O
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:58 pm
Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:56 am
Sadly, people die from various things everyday. And while we try to prevent a lot of them we don’t always succeed. We accept and live with this and will eventually have to do the same with covid
No
We find a way to eradicate such easily infectious life threatening diseases
Like Cholera TB Smallpox etc etc
As far as I know only smallpox has been eradicated.
And yes it would be great to eradicate others, but while we work on that life goes on
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 3:11 pm
by tuffers#1
Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 3:00 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:58 pm
Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:56 am
Sadly, people die from various things everyday. And while we try to prevent a lot of them we don’t always succeed. We accept and live with this and will eventually have to do the same with covid
No
We find a way to eradicate such easily infectious life threatening diseases
Like Cholera TB Smallpox etc etc
As far as I know only smallpox has been eradicated.
And yes it would be great to eradicate others, but while we work on that life goes on
Last Smallpox death 2013
Although officually eradicated it is
Kept alive in Laborotories so vaccines can be made .
The point is purely about doing things to rid ourselves
Of Highly Contagious diseases that could threaten the entire populus .
Covid is one of those .
Its not Cancer its not Heart disease ,
Its the Highly Contagious threat to Life of everyone .
Not to some , that is why vaccines are produced .
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:26 pm
by George M
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:35 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:31 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:56 am
I was talking about the ones that are still going to die because we’re shrugging our shoulders and saying it’s too late to do anything now, just get jabbed and get on with it.
Dead. Past tense
I said ‘The dead’.
It’s a noun.
Nouns don’t have tenses, you berk.
Pack it in, Thory.
“ Not for the dead it doesn’t “
“ I meant the ones who will die “
Let’s just agree you phrased it incorrectly
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:29 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:55 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:49 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:38 pm
So he isnt part of sage then ?
Because that is who we have been following govt &
medical scientific advice from , yet you call me the FOOL .
Georgie Porgie
Give it up now chap
I will try one more time as you appear more dense than I first thought. He is passing on to you in simple terms what the scientists who advise the government are saying.
You are so last year
Why do i need it in simple terms from him ?
I already understand it in the simplest terms straight from
The scientists the government use .
I do NOT NEED HIS INTERPRETATION .
Stop banging on about your imaginary lockdown then.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:32 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:26 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:35 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:31 pm
Dead. Past tense
I said ‘The dead’.
It’s a noun.
Nouns don’t have tenses, you berk.
Pack it in, Thory.
“ Not for the dead it doesn’t “
“ I meant the ones who will die “
Let’s just agree you phrased it incorrectly
What are you going on about Thory?
My words ‘Not for the dead’ has literally no reference to any tense. What are you getting out of this?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:48 pm
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:29 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:55 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:49 pm
I will try one more time as you appear more dense than I first thought. He is passing on to you in simple terms what the scientists who advise the government are saying.
You are so last year
Why do i need it in simple terms from him ?
I already understand it in the simplest terms straight from
The scientists the government use .
I do NOT NEED HIS INTERPRETATION .
Stop banging on about your imaginary lockdown then.
Where have i mentioned an imaginary lockdown ?
Damn its the Twighlight zone with you innit .
Only for drunks & insomniacs
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:40 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:48 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:29 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:55 pm
Why do i need it in simple terms from him ?
I already understand it in the simplest terms straight from
The scientists the government use .
I do NOT NEED HIS INTERPRETATION .
Stop banging on about your imaginary lockdown then.
Where have i mentioned an imaginary lockdown ?
Damn its the Twighlight zone with you innit .
Only for drunks & insomniacs
You didn’t. You mentioned a real one. I don’t think there will be one. Let’s discuss again in December. I will , of course , apologise if I’m wrong
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:54 pm
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:40 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:48 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:29 pm
Stop banging on about your imaginary lockdown then.
Where have i mentioned an imaginary lockdown ?
Damn its the Twighlight zone with you innit .
Only for drunks & insomniacs
You didn’t. You mentioned a real one. I don’t think there will be one. Let’s discuss again in December. I will , of course , apologise if I’m wrong
I mentioned that scientists would call for one if numbers rose drastically .
See if you listen to what the scientists actually say , instead
Of what some Doc on GB news interprets what they have said
Youd No already .
If case numbers go up drastically there
Will be pressure on hospitals . If hospitals
Are under pressure , it is inevitable there will be
Further lockdowns .
If the Hospitals arent under pressure there
Probably wont be a lockdown .see pretty much the same as last March really .
Night Night T.Z
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:04 am
by Still's Carenae
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:54 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:40 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:48 pm
Where have i mentioned an imaginary lockdown ?
Damn its the Twighlight zone with you innit .
Only for drunks & insomniacs
You didn’t. You mentioned a real one. I don’t think there will be one. Let’s discuss again in December. I will , of course , apologise if I’m wrong
I mentioned that scientists would call for one if numbers rose drastically .
See if you listen to what the scientists actually say , instead
Of what some Doc on GB news interprets what they have said
Youd No already .
If case numbers go up drastically there
Will be pressure on hospitals . If hospitals
Are under pressure , it is inevitable there will be
Further lockdowns .
If the Hospitals arent under pressure there
Probably wont be a lockdown .see pretty much the same as last March really .
Night Night T.Z
Don't worry, the government is considering a new way of putting the nhs under a lot more pressure, just like the care homes
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 9:04 am
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Was reading this earlier in relation to Ontario's mandatory vaccine requirements, something I was hoping we'd implement.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 11:24 am
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:54 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:40 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 5:48 pm
Where have i mentioned an imaginary lockdown ?
Damn its the Twighlight zone with you innit .
Only for drunks & insomniacs
You didn’t. You mentioned a real one. I don’t think there will be one. Let’s discuss again in December. I will , of course , apologise if I’m wrong
I mentioned that scientists would call for one if numbers rose drastically .
See if you listen to what the scientists actually say , instead
Of what some Doc on GB news interprets what they have said
Youd No already .
If case numbers go up drastically there
Will be pressure on hospitals . If hospitals
Are under pressure , it is inevitable there will be
Further lockdowns .
If the Hospitals arent under pressure there
Probably wont be a lockdown .see pretty much the same as last March really .
Night Night T.Z
See you in December
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 11:57 am
by tuffers#1
George wrote: ↑Sun Sep 05, 2021 11:24 am
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:54 pm
George wrote: ↑Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:40 pm
You didn’t. You mentioned a real one. I don’t think there will be one. Let’s discuss again in December. I will , of course , apologise if I’m wrong
I mentioned that scientists would call for one if numbers rose drastically .
See if you listen to what the scientists actually say , instead
Of what some Doc on GB news interprets what they have said
Youd No already .
If case numbers go up drastically there
Will be pressure on hospitals . If hospitals
Are under pressure , it is inevitable there will be
Further lockdowns .
If the Hospitals arent under pressure there
Probably wont be a lockdown .see pretty much the same as last March really .
Night Night T.Z
See you in December
Why
You already so sure you need to apologise ?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:06 pm
by Long slender neck
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 1:37 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
