Page 273 of 287
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 9:57 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Bank of England slashes growth forecast and says businesses are raising prices because of Labour’s budget
https://www.thetimes.com/article/b06b58 ... 3b99cf5916
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 5:21 pm
by Dohnut
Hardly a surprise. This follows on from various people both public and private sector say. Starmer et al now simply playing for time hoping for a miracle. Jam tomorrow stuff. Jam tomorrow because they’ve screwed up today. Worse to come I fear. I just hope peoples don’t pay for this folly with their jobs and their lives. Let’s hope for a mild winter.
At least they are doing their best to repair the damage done with Trump. Naive beyond belief what’s gone before.. And putting in money to repair pot holes. All they need to do now is resolve policy holes.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:08 pm
by Max B Gold
Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 5:21 pm
Hardly a surprise. This follows on from various people both public and private sector say. Starmer et al now simply playing for time hoping for a miracle. Jam tomorrow stuff. Jam tomorrow because they’ve screwed up today. Worse to come I fear. I just hope peoples don’t pay for this folly with their jobs and their lives. Let’s hope for a mild winter.
At least they are doing their best to repair the damage done with Trump. Naive beyond belief what’s gone before.. And putting in money to repair pot holes. All they need to do now is resolve policy holes.
Shambles of a post. You need to do botter.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:18 pm
by Orient_Man_And_Boy
Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 5:21 pm
Hardly a surprise. This follows on from various people both public and private sector say. Starmer et al now simply playing for time hoping for a miracle. Jam tomorrow stuff. Jam tomorrow because they’ve screwed up today. Worse to come I fear. I just hope peoples don’t pay for this folly with their jobs and their lives. Let’s hope for a mild winter.
At least they are doing their best to repair the damage done with Trump. Naive beyond belief what’s gone before.. And putting in money to repair pot holes. All they need to do now is resolve policy holes.
Relationship with Trump!!?? What Mr M said about President Trump back in ‘19 was just shown on TV. It was far from diplomatic.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:44 pm
by Max B Gold
Orient_Man_And_Boy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:18 pm
Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 5:21 pm
Hardly a surprise. This follows on from various people both public and private sector say. Starmer et al now simply playing for time hoping for a miracle. Jam tomorrow stuff. Jam tomorrow because they’ve screwed up today. Worse to come I fear. I just hope peoples don’t pay for this folly with their jobs and their lives. Let’s hope for a mild winter.
At least they are doing their best to repair the damage done with Trump. Naive beyond belief what’s gone before.. And putting in money to repair pot holes. All they need to do now is resolve policy holes.
Relationship with Trump!!?? What Mr M said about President Trump back in ‘19 was just shown on TV. It was far from diplomatic.
That's just Pete though.
Our corporate Overlords have obviously decided to put Pete in place to solidify their control and undermine democracy further. Slimey Pete's the man for the job.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 11:19 pm
by Dohnut
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:44 pm
Orient_Man_And_Boy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:18 pm
Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 5:21 pm
Hardly a surprise. This follows on from various people both public and private sector say. Starmer et al now simply playing for time hoping for a miracle. Jam tomorrow stuff. Jam tomorrow because they’ve screwed up today. Worse to come I fear. I just hope peoples don’t pay for this folly with their jobs and their lives. Let’s hope for a mild winter.
At least they are doing their best to repair the damage done with Trump. Naive beyond belief what’s gone before.. And putting in money to repair pot holes. All they need to do now is resolve policy holes.
Relationship with Trump!!?? What Mr M said about President Trump back in ‘19 was just shown on TV. It was far from diplomatic.
That's just Pete though.
Our corporate Overlords have obviously decided to put Pete in place to solidify their control and undermine democracy further. Slimey Pete's the man for the job.
Just read one of Trumps advisors has called Mandleson a moron. Didn’t realise Mandleson was a one-time critic of Trump calling him all sorts of nasty names. Missed that in the past.
Maybe this appointment isn’t so great after all. There’s me trying to suggest Starmer got it right!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 4:09 pm
by Max B Gold
Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 11:19 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:44 pm
Orient_Man_And_Boy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:18 pm
Relationship with Trump!!?? What Mr M said about President Trump back in ‘19 was just shown on TV. It was far from diplomatic.
That's just Pete though.
Our corporate Overlords have obviously decided to put Pete in place to solidify their control and undermine democracy further. Slimey Pete's the man for the job.
Just read one of Trumps advisors has called Mandleson a moron. Didn’t realise Mandleson was a one-time critic of Trump calling him all sorts of nasty names. Missed that in the past.
Maybe this appointment isn’t so great after all. There’s me trying to suggest Starmer got it right!
You may have a point but whatever way you look at it, it's a shambles.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 4:40 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2025 6:06 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Two tier Kier
”Starmer booed for jumping toboggan queue on Madeira holiday”
https://www.thetimes.com/article/9a8f69 ... 719a8454b1
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2025 10:56 pm
by Dohnut
Annoyed again, still waiting for my Starmer begging letter as he reaches out for any ideas on how to boost the economy. When the answer is so simple. Resign and take Rayner and Reeves with you. An immediate boost right there.
The three shambleers.
None for all, all for them.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:55 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Looks like the Tulip Siddiq corruption story is going to run and run. Given she’s part of Keir’s North Central London circle he’ll fight for her a lot more than he did Haigh though.
A free two bedroom flat in central London aged 20 from someone your family are awarding government contracts to seems like a seeet deal though tbf
https://www.thetimes.com/article/33f2cc ... bf45a1fed1
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:56 am
by Hoover Attack
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:55 am
Looks like the Tulip Siddiq corruption story is going to run and run. Given she’s part of Keir’s North Central London circle he’ll fight for her a lot more than he did Haigh though.
A free two bedroom flat in central London aged 20 from someone your family are awarding government contracts to seems like a seeet deal though tbf
https://www.thetimes.com/article/33f2cc ... bf45a1fed1
As economic secretary to the Treasury, she is responsible for tackling corruption in the UK’s financial markets
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 12:13 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:46 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
This is just fine
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/Qv5H7XK/IMG-1400.jpg)
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:52 pm
by Proposition Joe
Quite fancied her at one point.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:10 pm
by Hoover Attack
Those values seem very reasonable for the areas we’re discussing.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:12 pm
by Proposition Joe
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:10 pm
Those values seem very reasonable for the areas we’re discussing.
500k for a flat in Hampstead? All totally normal and above board.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:27 pm
by Dunners
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:52 pm
Quite fancied her at one point.
If anything, this makes me fancy her even more.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:36 am
by Max B Gold
Dunners wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:27 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:52 pm
Quite fancied her at one point.
If anything, this makes me fancy her even more.
Before we all fall in
![❤️](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/2764.svg)
. Can somebody post a picture.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 7:07 am
by Currywurst and Chips
On the far left of the picture
![Image](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/scaled/2015/04/11/20/277819F700000578-0-image-a-9_1428781669102.jpg)
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:40 pm
by Proposition Joe
Tbf first time in a while that she's been on the far left of something.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:34 pm
by BoniO
I’ve not been following this story. Is it really as dodgy as it seems. If it is then Starmer has to crucify her or he might just as well rename Labour as Tory Lite and be done with it.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 3:16 pm
by faldO
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 8:39 pm
by Max B Gold
What is so wrong with being a hypocrite?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 8:50 pm
by faldO
Nothing, apparently.