Page 265 of 265

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:54 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Dohnut wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:43 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:17 pm Labour’s no. 1 objective was economic growth and they aim to achieve this whilst taxing businesses more to expand/exist/start

Has this worked in the past?
No is the short answer.

We hear about putting more money in people’s pockets, working with businesses to generate growth and investment and being honest with people. Yet we have had nothing but the opposite.
That’s what I thought

Do you happen to have any experience in business and/or economics yourself? And how would you fix it?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:28 pm
by Dohnut
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:54 pm
Dohnut wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:43 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:17 pm Labour’s no. 1 objective was economic growth and they aim to achieve this whilst taxing businesses more to expand/exist/start

Has this worked in the past?
No is the short answer.

We hear about putting more money in people’s pockets, working with businesses to generate growth and investment and being honest with people. Yet we have had nothing but the opposite.
That’s what I thought

Do you happen to have any experience in business and/or economics yourself? And how would you fix it?
The best way I could help is not getting into politics. Enough idiots in there already. 😂

but I believe in a number of things. Business not Government drive growth. So support business, including farming. And I prefer the concept of people deciding how to spend their money and not the Government deciding for them. Reduce not increase taxation. But that’s simplistic I know.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:33 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Buy low, sell high guys

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:03 pm
by Dohnut
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:33 pm Buy low, sell high guys
When you buy low it’s because someone else is selling low. And vice verse. Two way transaction!

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:05 pm
by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Cracking insight

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:18 pm
by Max B Gold
Dohnut wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:03 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:33 pm Buy low, sell high guys
When you buy low it’s because someone else is selling low. And vice verse. Two way transaction!
Fantastic comment and it seems to me you are a real defender of free speech. Added to that you come across as someone who takes things seriously and sensitively. You've got a good eye for detail and a very enjoyable writing style which it is a joy to read. Your comments are very important to this forum. Keep it up!!

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:27 pm
by Dunners
What, no biscuits? McShambles!


Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:55 pm
by Hoover Attack
All because they're being asked to pay a little bit more Ers NI and a slightly higher minimum wage? Go on then mate, off you f*ck.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:57 pm
by Long slender neck
Is this the same mcvities that saw "profits skyrocket to £131m"?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/m ... e%20period.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:15 pm
by Chelmsford Swimmer
No matter how many bosses of industry make statements on the lack of growth that will result from this budget, the likes of Long slender neck with their lack of knowledge of basic economics, will remain convinced the budget was great. As long as they perceive someone else is paying they are happy, with no concept that If the economy suffers, everybody suffers.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:23 pm
by Hoover Attack
Sir John McVities and his fellow bosses of industry are whinging because they've got to pay a bit more tax and slightly higher wages to their lowest paid workers. So will have less profit to pay to dividends and have to pay themselves a slightly lower bonus.

That's their concern. f*** 'em.