Page 27 of 251

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:55 pm
by Long slender neck
Would rather Corbs focussed on Britain

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:57 pm
by StillSpike
Well wee Nicola did, at least, retweet Ian Blackford's condemnation of Turkey, so I guess that counts as commenting, nowadays (but it's hardly the same as tapping out her own "comment".

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:59 pm
by StillSpike
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:55 pm Would rather Corbs focussed on Britain
You can do 2 things, you know.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:10 pm
by Long slender neck
But perhaps only half as well.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:15 am
by Mikero
Sums up Corbyn's leadership skills that.

Mikero

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:23 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
What does?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:57 pm
by Nice Username
Even McDonnell knows which way things are heading now. Not long left for jErEmy

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:19 pm
by Long slender neck
As Labour leader or in general?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:54 am
by Mikero
It will become inevitable when it comes to getting a coalition together after the next election, he stuggles to run his own party and could not handle anything bigger. Of course John Landsman would have to go as well as he is one of these corrosive influences that could never work with other parties.

Mikero

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:06 pm
by Disoriented
Mikero wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:54 am It will become inevitable when it comes to getting a coalition together after the next election, he stuggles to run his own party and could not handle anything bigger. Of course John Landsman would have to go as well as he is one of these corrosive influences that could never work with other parties.

Mikero
Ain’t that the truth. McCluskey is equally corrosive.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:01 am
by StockholmO
Another Labour MP quits over anti-semitism. Although I'm sure someone will point out that Momentum were about to deselect her and it has nothing to do with her being Jewish. Obviously.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50077384

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:38 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Yes, she’s a Blairite. And yes, she’s a warmonger.

But it’s still sad to see MPs taking this stance with Jeremy because of their support of Israel’s ‘foreign policy’ and his support of Palestine and a two state solution.

Goodbye to her, and good luck in the By election I’m sure she’ll be calling....

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:03 am
by Clive Evans
RedO said:-Yes, she’s a Blairite. And yes, she’s a warmonger.

But it’s still sad to see MPs taking this stance with Jeremy because of their support of Israel’s ‘foreign policy’ and his support of Palestine and a two state solution.

Goodbye to her, and good luck in the By election I’m sure she’ll be calling....
Top


Yes and let's forget her 55 years of dedicated service to the Labour Party. Of course we all need to be petty minded like yourself and adhere strictly to the Party Line comrade. Still, Comrade you will have plenty of time soon when Labour loose the next Election, to reflect on why very many people have left the Labour Party, like myself and unable to vote for such a narrow minded Organisation.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:50 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Very many people have left the Labour Party? I though membership numbers had gone through the roof?

We all know what this is about. And it’s not anti-semitism. And her using that as an excuse is pretty low.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:15 am
by Thor
RedO wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:50 am Very many people have left the Labour Party? I though membership numbers had gone through the roof?

We all know what this is about. And it’s not anti-semitism. And her using that as an excuse is pretty low.
I was going to post earlier, the next one along will say how well the membership numbers are doing. So Redo can you please show us some proof of actual member numbers over a period of say 2 years so we can see if the movement is up, down or stagnant. Thanks I look forwards to seeing your supported evidence.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:22 am
by Clive Evans
Mr RedO time to cast off your blinkers and pay a trip to specsavers:-


Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour lost more than 45,000 members in 2018.The decline in membership in 2018 came amid dissatisfaction with Mr Corbyn’s performance as leader and the party’s equivocal stance on Brexit. That dissatisfaction has intensified in subsequent months, with Labour losing seats in both local and European elections.

Labour’s membership fell from 564,000 at the end of 2017 to 519,000 at the end of last year, according to the party’s annual accounts

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:28 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Got any info on those numbers going back to, I don't know, say 2014 ?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:55 am
by Max B Gold
My gangs bigger than your gang. My dad's bigger than your dad.

Good political debate from the Red Tory faction. For once can youse no argue the politics instead of instantly wheeling out the smears.

Ellmans local party don't like her politics and if as she contends it's about antisemitism than why did they wait 22 years?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:03 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:10 pm But perhaps only half as well.
For Corbyn half as well in an improvement.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:26 pm
by Clive Evans
RedO said:-Got any info on those numbers going back to, I don't know, say 2014 ?

Why don't you read what I wrote, and you will get your answers. Your slap-dash approach to boarding explains your mis-informed views. Those figures are actually the figures quoted by the Labour party.
Yes, initially after Jezza was elected as leader ( many said he was nominated as prank-well that back-fired didn't it? ); Labour membership soared, but since the last election there has been many, many resignations. Most of the Ultras in the Labour Party say that people are put off by true Socialism. I can only speak for myself, I thought the policies were great. It is his obsession with the Palestinians and anti-Semitism that I find unpalatable

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:34 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
West Side, what are your views on the two state solution?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:36 pm
by Ornchurch
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:55 am My gangs bigger than your gang. My dad's bigger than your dad.

Good political debate from the Red Tory faction. For once can youse no argue the politics instead of instantly wheeling out the smears.

Ellmans local party don't like her politics and if as she contends it's about antisemitism than why did they wait 22 years?
Political debate? On here? :lol: :lol:

Just those on the Left and Right posting abuse to each other.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:27 pm
by Mikero
Bit like parliament then.

Mikero

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:32 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:55 am My gangs bigger than your gang. My dad's bigger than your dad.

Good political debate from the Red Tory faction. For once can youse no argue the politics instead of instantly wheeling out the smears.

Ellmans local party don't like her politics and if as she contends it's about antisemitism than why did they wait 22 years?
If people don’t like The way Labour deal with a problem, then the party line is they should f.off.

People who have worked for the party for over half a century count for nothing. Little short of a dictatorship.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:32 pm
by Clive Evans
RedO said :-West Side, what are your views on the two state solution?

Answer, if you ain't got no power, your views are irrelevant