Harris v. Trump

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2456
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1131 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Mistadobalina »

Currywurst and Chips wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:33 am
Mistadobalina wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:20 am Heaven forbid a president sticks his neck out for a nonce.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gxy2qxxpzo

Think Biden has thought f*ck it I'm not long for this world and the Democrats stitched me up over running again so why would I owe them loyalty over my family. Which goes to show how insane presidential powers are in the US.
Hi Terry, had a feeling I’d see you here
Pretty obvious I'm not defending Biden here, but if RD is gonna talk about men in close proximity to power going for underage girls, worth asking the question on whether he thinks Trump nominating a nonce for a senior administration role is an issue.
User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6287
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 396 times
Been thanked: 1496 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

Mistadobalina wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:46 am
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:33 am
Mistadobalina wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:20 am Heaven forbid a president sticks his neck out for a nonce.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gxy2qxxpzo

Think Biden has thought f*ck it I'm not long for this world and the Democrats stitched me up over running again so why would I owe them loyalty over my family. Which goes to show how insane presidential powers are in the US.
Hi Terry, had a feeling I’d see you here
Pretty obvious I'm not defending Biden here, but if RD is gonna talk about men in close proximity to power going for underage girls, worth asking the question on whether he thinks Trump nominating a nonce for a senior administration role is an issue.
Ok I’ll bite on your whatabouterry

Gaetz isn’t Trump’s son; Gaetz hasn’t been convicted despite clearly being a wrgonun; Trump didn’t spend months saying he definitively wouldn’t pardon Gaetz before doing it; Trump hasn’t spent the last 5 years claiming the moral high ground; Gaetz doesn’t now have immunity for a decade of potential crimes that cannot now be investigated.
CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 756
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 200 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo »

In terms of public discourse, “no morals” or “disregarding ethics completely” will always win against “selective morals” or “ethics are important until they’re in the way”

There’s no point whatsoever in the Democrats ever taking issue with the Trump administration’s ethics if they are making themselves ripe for accusations of hypocrisy. The difficult conversation should have been had between Biden and his son that he simply shouldn’t have the right to pardon his son
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9096
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1078 times
Been thanked: 2515 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

It's hard to imagine how the Democrats could have f*cked things up for themselves more than what they've done over the past six months.
CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 756
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 200 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo »

“Now that Trump is out, the one thing we’d better make sure of is that our guy is mentally competent and ethically beyond reproach over the next four years”
User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6287
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 396 times
Been thanked: 1496 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

E10EU wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:03 am https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/art ... -wisconsin

Maybe there is hope for the US after all?
Big donations for her campaign have flooded in. Brave, intelligent, gutsy, accomplished - what's not to like?
The opening post
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12586
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Currywurst and Chips wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 4:50 pm
E10EU wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:03 am https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/art ... -wisconsin

Maybe there is hope for the US after all?
Big donations for her campaign have flooded in. Brave, intelligent, gutsy, accomplished - what's not to like?
The opening post
Yep , shot down in flames
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12586
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Stowaway wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:26 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:24 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:09 pm Lucky the normal, decent communicator got in, I guess.
One who proved a good President before and had a grasp on economics .
Have many gins have you sunk, you mentalist?
Just watch , he will get America flying . However Labour will be destroying us in their insanity to hit net zero targets. Just watch what happens
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12586
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Dunners wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 3:59 pm It's hard to imagine how the Democrats could have f*cked things up for themselves more than what they've done over the past six months.
Absolutely.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14375
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2531 times
Been thanked: 3318 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Long slender neck »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:39 pm
Stowaway wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:26 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:24 am

One who proved a good President before and had a grasp on economics .
Have many gins have you sunk, you mentalist?
Just watch , he will get America flying . However Labour will be destroying us in their insanity to hit net zero targets. Just watch what happens
By which date will these events happen? When can we judge this? And by which measure?
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12586
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

I am not Nostradamus so I can’t give you an exact time and date but we’ll see where America are at the end of Trump’s four years in office. We can talk about it again then.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14375
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2531 times
Been thanked: 3318 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Long slender neck »

FFS we'll all be radioactive dust by then
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4795
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2105 times
Been thanked: 1720 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Proposition Joe »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:39 pm
Stowaway wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:26 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:24 am

One who proved a good President before and had a grasp on economics .
Have many gins have you sunk, you mentalist?
Just watch , he will get America flying . However Labour will be destroying us in their insanity to hit net zero targets. Just watch what happens
Narrator's voice: America did not fly. But it didn't matter, because the Maga cranks claimed it did anyway.
oxo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
Has thanked: 338 times
Been thanked: 113 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by oxo »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:24 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:09 pm Lucky the normal, decent communicator got in, I guess.
One who proved a good President before and had a grasp on economics .
Multiple studies have concluded that his tariffs actually ended up reducing GDP, increasing the cost of consumer goods (obviously) and, in net terms, costing hundreds of thousands of American jobs. He’s absolutely clueless RE: economics
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4795
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2105 times
Been thanked: 1720 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Proposition Joe »

oxo wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:28 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:24 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:09 pm Lucky the normal, decent communicator got in, I guess.
One who proved a good President before and had a grasp on economics .
Multiple studies have concluded that his tariffs actually ended up reducing GDP, increasing the cost of consumer goods (obviously) and, in net terms, costing hundreds of thousands of American jobs. He’s absolutely clueless RE: economics
But RedDwarf says otherwise. Who to believe?!

The number of interviews I've seen with Maga types all saying how great tariffs are until it's explained to them what this actually means for American businesses is hilarious. Their minds get fried, they all agree it's bad, but then the brain glitches and they still say it's good because Trump. Fascinating.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12586
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Drill baby drill . Regardless, with cheap fuel America will be doing just fine under Trump . Meanwhile, we’re going to get our bollocks broken trying to reach impossible net zero targets. I suppose you can always blame Brexit for Labour’s ( Miliband’s ) insanity.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9096
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1078 times
Been thanked: 2515 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

The UK Government not only has to think about its relationship with the US, but it will be keeping a nervous eye on the economic, political and demographic turmoil unfolding in France and Germany.

And, if that's not enough, we appear to be witnessing what could be the re-emergence of Ottoman v Persian conflict for dominance in the Middle East, with the potential to disrupt trade routes and oil supplies.
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12426
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1003 times
Been thanked: 2832 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Max B Gold »

Dunners wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:00 am The UK Government not only has to think about its relationship with the US, but it will be keeping a nervous eye on the economic, political and demographic turmoil unfolding in France and Germany.

And, if that's not enough, we appear to be witnessing what could be the re-emergence of Ottoman v Persian conflict for dominance in the Middle East, with the potential to disrupt trade routes and oil supplies.
Who you siding with in the Ottoman v Persia match?
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4795
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2105 times
Been thanked: 1720 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Proposition Joe »

Beds v Rugs, what a clash.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9096
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1078 times
Been thanked: 2515 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

Max B Gold wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:06 am
Dunners wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:00 am The UK Government not only has to think about its relationship with the US, but it will be keeping a nervous eye on the economic, political and demographic turmoil unfolding in France and Germany.

And, if that's not enough, we appear to be witnessing what could be the re-emergence of Ottoman v Persian conflict for dominance in the Middle East, with the potential to disrupt trade routes and oil supplies.
Who you siding with in the Ottoman v Persia match?
The Greeks.
Post Reply