Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:09 pm
I’m not sure that’s strictly true. I’m pretty sure the good schools like Eton and Harrow did the decent thing and shut down - it was only the idiotic state schools that were still open
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
The first jab is only 60% effective. Same as the flu jab. After 2 jabs the number goes up to 90%. This means there will be 10% of those getting both jabs who won’t get the full benefits, if any. That number will ultimately run into millions.Clive Evans wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:08 am I am taking part in a Covid survey. I have to give half a finger full of blood every fortnight to check for antibodies. The first on was 4 weeks after a jab & no antibodies. Gave my red stuff yesterday for 2nd test. Waiting results. So beware I had no measurable immunity 4 weeks after jab 1. So take care out there.
So sorry to hear this Clive. Do you know how many weeks this goes on for? How many fingers will you have left at the end of this ordeal?Clive Evans wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:08 am I am taking part in a Covid survey. I have to give half a finger full of blood every fortnight to check for antibodies.
It's also vital that people still follow the guidance/rules and do what they can to stop catching, and spreading, this virus.Dohnut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 10:21 amThe first jab is only 60% effective. Same as the flu jab. After 2 jabs the number goes up to 90%. This means there will be 10% of those getting both jabs who won’t get the full benefits, if any. That number will ultimately run into millions.Clive Evans wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:08 am I am taking part in a Covid survey. I have to give half a finger full of blood every fortnight to check for antibodies. The first on was 4 weeks after a jab & no antibodies. Gave my red stuff yesterday for 2nd test. Waiting results. So beware I had no measurable immunity 4 weeks after jab 1. So take care out there.
The jab is about reducing numbers to manageable levels, reduce mutation opportunities, so the NHS can cope and the country can resume some sort of normality. But they will never 100% solve the problem. This virus will kill people ever more, as does the flu.
This is why it is vital that people get the jab. It reduces numbers, reduces risk and protects those to whom the jab offers limited or no protection.
It’s a numbers game.
Keep us updated , Clive , as your results will be really interesting to allClive Evans wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:18 pm When I did the first blood test, the thing that punctures you, had such a kick my finger was a bit sore for a week. The last one wasn't too bad. They are pretty quick giving you the results, so I will let you all know. I wonder if they will notice if I send my dog's blood next time?
This is absolutely the best advice and people should both listen to and heed.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 10:57 amIt's also vital that people still follow the guidance/rules and do what they can to stop catching, and spreading, this virus.Dohnut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 10:21 amThe first jab is only 60% effective. Same as the flu jab. After 2 jabs the number goes up to 90%. This means there will be 10% of those getting both jabs who won’t get the full benefits, if any. That number will ultimately run into millions.Clive Evans wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:08 am I am taking part in a Covid survey. I have to give half a finger full of blood every fortnight to check for antibodies. The first on was 4 weeks after a jab & no antibodies. Gave my red stuff yesterday for 2nd test. Waiting results. So beware I had no measurable immunity 4 weeks after jab 1. So take care out there.
The jab is about reducing numbers to manageable levels, reduce mutation opportunities, so the NHS can cope and the country can resume some sort of normality. But they will never 100% solve the problem. This virus will kill people ever more, as does the flu.
This is why it is vital that people get the jab. It reduces numbers, reduces risk and protects those to whom the jab offers limited or no protection.
It’s a numbers game.
Keep taking the Bob Martin tabletsClive Evans wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:18 pm When I did the first blood test, the thing that punctures you, had such a kick my finger was a bit sore for a week. The last one wasn't too bad. They are pretty quick giving you the results, so I will let you all know. I wonder if they will notice if I send my dog's blood next time?
Political.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:16 pm Germany have suspended use of the Oxford vaccine again
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56580728
This shitshow whereby EU states do their best to destroy the reputation of the vaccine due to it being British - then the EU threatening AZ with export bans because of it's own failings with procurement just to block a vaccine that has been rubbished by leaders of its membership despite being the easiest and cheapest vaccine to administer
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 7:03 pm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56616119
Seeming more and more like there is a small blood clot risk for younger people having the Oxford jab.
It was the International regulators who made that statement - not AZ. I watched the broadcast. You can hardly blame AZ for quoting from that statement.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 7:11 pmPrestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 7:03 pm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56616119
Seeming more and more like there is a small blood clot risk for younger people having the Oxford jab.
“The pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca has said international regulators had found the benefits of its jab outweighed risks significantly.”
They kind of would say that, wouldn’t they. The 30 people with the blood clots might disagree though.