Page 245 of 263
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 3:26 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 2:30 pm
He got a free jolly to Tunisia to commemorate dead members of Black September
Didn't you get the memo. The scam is over.
Some facts:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45196409
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 3:53 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
At least he wanted to “keep it cheap” for his hosts (also so he wouldn’t have to declare it)
https://www.thejc.com/news/jeremy-corby ... 7024000011
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:14 pm
by Hoover Attack
Is that the same JC that all the columnists are deserting after their latest scandal?
Sounds a reliable source.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:17 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:14 pm
Is that the same JC that all the columnists are deserting after their latest scandal?
Sounds a reliable source.
They weren’t the source for the story quoted
Here’s another press outlet for you though:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics ... i-semitism
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:21 pm
by Hoover Attack
You can't believe a word that arse-wipe of a newspaper writes either.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:24 pm
by Max B Gold
Two of the biggest fabricators of lies this side of the Mississippi.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:28 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
I forgot you only accept unreferenced tweets from bots as legitimate sources
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:32 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:28 pm
I forgot you only accept unreferenced tweets from bots as legitimate sources
Correct but that's whataboutery. In this particular situation we are talking about you relying on two of the biggest lying newspapers in Christendom to support your own manufactured lie.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:35 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:32 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:28 pm
I forgot you only accept unreferenced tweets from bots as legitimate sources
Correct but that's whataboutery. In this particular situation we are talking about you relying on two of the biggest lying newspapers in Christendom to support your own manufactured lie.
They’re not the source for the story
Here’s a third source, his spokesman being quoted
https://www.ft.com/content/6f4dc1e2-a07 ... b7a9ce36e4
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:42 pm
by Max B Gold
Conveniently for you it's behind a pay wall but why should I give any credence to an article in a right wing propaganda publication. What you posted above remains a lie.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:46 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Keep pretending to believe that.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:48 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:46 pm
Keep pretending to believe that. I’m done trying to educate you
That is completely unrelated to your original lie.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:51 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
We’re talking about freebies, keep up
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 5:25 pm
by Max B Gold
I wasn't. I was talking about your lie and then the subsequent deflection when this was pointed out to you.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 5:31 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
You missed the point then and given you’re not denying Corbyn took a freebie from the Tunisian government any more…. I guess I win!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:23 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 5:31 pm
You missed the point then and given you’re not denying Corbyn took a freebie from the Tunisian government any more…. I guess I win!
No I didn't miss the point at all. But yes you win.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:27 pm
by The Mindsweep
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:49 pm
by J1MB0B
Why don’t politicians just not take freebies. They’re on a good salary pay for your tickets, meals, holidays. It would quiet a lot of the noise around them.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 8:03 pm
by Max B Gold
J1MB0B wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:49 pm
Why don’t politicians just not take freebies. They’re on a good salary pay for your tickets, meals, holidays. It would quiet a lot of the noise around them.
By freebies do you mean bribes.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 8:44 pm
by Dunners
I'm staying out of this argument.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2024 11:50 am
by Max B Gold
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2024 12:00 pm
by Hoover Attack
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2024 12:04 pm
by Hoover Attack
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2024 3:42 pm
by Dohnut
Porky sausages I assume. Rather than his previous porky pies?. What a joke of a speech, the unintentional joke the best of all. Free gear kier at his finest.
Just found out he took £20k to help his son study for GCSEs in peace and quiet. Two tier Kier at his finest again.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2024 4:12 pm
by BoniO
Dohnut wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2024 3:42 pm
Porky sausages I assume. Rather than his previous porky pies?. What a joke of a speech, the unintentional joke the best of all. Free gear kier at his finest.
Just found out he took £20k to help his son study for GCSEs in peace and quiet. Two tier Kier at his finest again.
Where did "just find this out" then? Bloke down the pub or some lying Tory rag? Even if it was true, whilst not great, it would still be totally insignificant when compared with the dirty thieving Tories that you doubtless support. They robbed us blind and took the p*ss on an industrial scale. Starmer is a mere amateur compared to those corrupt bar-stewards.
Maybe you should just face it. You lost. Get used to it.