Page 24 of 266
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:08 am
by Disoriented
Orientinoz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 am
He's right though Dis...I wouldn't trust Corby to run a bath let alone a country..
If your further response is you trust Johnson and the nasty party instead, you have written your own credibility epitaph.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:02 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:08 am
Orientinoz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 am
He's right though Dis...I wouldn't trust Corby to run a bath let alone a country..
If your further response is you trust Johnson and the nasty party instead, you have written your own credibility epitaph.
Corbyns incompetence isn’t excused by the quality, or lack of, his opponent. The guy is incompetent and the run a bath comment fully justified. Bringing up Johnson is pure deflection.
The reason why we may end up with Johnson is Corbyn. The Tories biggest asset is the Labour Leader. Fecking tragic.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:06 am
by Disoriented
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:02 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:08 am
Orientinoz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 am
He's right though Dis...I wouldn't trust Corby to run a bath let alone a country..
If your further response is you trust Johnson and the nasty party instead, you have written your own credibility epitaph.
Corbyns incompetence isn’t excused by the quality, or lack of, his opponent. The guy is incompetent and the run a bath comment fully justified. Bringing up Johnson is pure deflection.
The reason why we may end up with Johnson is Corbyn. The Tories biggest asset is the Labour Leader. Fecking tragic.
You are yet to give ANY evidence for how Corbyn is incompetent. Any.
We get you don’t like the fella as you criticise him ad nauseam. But you have provided no valid reasons for why he is worse than lying Johnson.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:11 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:06 am
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:02 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:08 am
If your further response is you trust Johnson and the nasty party instead, you have written your own credibility epitaph.
Corbyns incompetence isn’t excused by the quality, or lack of, his opponent. The guy is incompetent and the run a bath comment fully justified. Bringing up Johnson is pure deflection.
The reason why we may end up with Johnson is Corbyn. The Tories biggest asset is the Labour Leader. Fecking tragic.
You are yet to give ANY evidence for how Corbyn is incompetent. Any.
We get you don’t like the fella as you criticise him ad nauseam. But you have provided no valid reasons for why he is worse than lying Johnson.
I’ll take my lead from his aide who has just resigned. None so blind.....
Labour need a new leader, one who can win an election. Someone who don’t forever sit on the fence but has the balls to make a stand. I don’t like Johnson, never have, never will. But he takes a position and goes for it full pelt. No ambiguity. Called being a leader.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:28 am
by Disoriented
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:11 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:06 am
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:02 am
Corbyns incompetence isn’t excused by the quality, or lack of, his opponent. The guy is incompetent and the run a bath comment fully justified. Bringing up Johnson is pure deflection.
The reason why we may end up with Johnson is Corbyn. The Tories biggest asset is the Labour Leader. Fecking tragic.
You are yet to give ANY evidence for how Corbyn is incompetent. Any.
We get you don’t like the fella as you criticise him ad nauseam. But you have provided no valid reasons for why he is worse than lying Johnson.
I’ll take my lead from his aide who has just resigned. None so blind.....
Labour need a new leader, one who can win an election. Someone who don’t forever sit on the fence but has the balls to make a stand. I don’t like Johnson, never have, never will. But he takes a position and goes for it full pelt. No ambiguity. Called being a leader.
You mean the aide who resigned for family reasons?
None of what you have stated above equals incompetence either. It comes across as bitterness without reason.
Quite sad really that prejudices can be so openly on display.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:40 am
by Sid Bishop
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:28 am
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:11 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:06 am
You are yet to give ANY evidence for how Corbyn is incompetent. Any.
We get you don’t like the fella as you criticise him ad nauseam. But you have provided no valid reasons for why he is worse than lying Johnson.
I’ll take my lead from his aide who has just resigned. None so blind.....
Labour need a new leader, one who can win an election. Someone who don’t forever sit on the fence but has the balls to make a stand. I don’t like Johnson, never have, never will. But he takes a position and goes for it full pelt. No ambiguity. Called being a leader.
You mean the aide who resigned for family reasons?
None of what you have stated above equals incompetence either. It comes across as bitterness without reason.
Quite sad really that prejudices can be so openly on display.
Going by previous posts you made in the past, thought you did not rate Corbyn , perhaps I got that wrong ? Also thought you were liking the Lib Dems in the last few weeks and Jo Swinson !!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:46 am
by Disoriented
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:40 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:28 am
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:11 am
I’ll take my lead from his aide who has just resigned. None so blind.....
Labour need a new leader, one who can win an election. Someone who don’t forever sit on the fence but has the balls to make a stand. I don’t like Johnson, never have, never will. But he takes a position and goes for it full pelt. No ambiguity. Called being a leader.
You mean the aide who resigned for family reasons?
None of what you have stated above equals incompetence either. It comes across as bitterness without reason.
Quite sad really that prejudices can be so openly on display.
Going by previous posts you made in the past, thought you did not rate Corbyn , perhaps I got that wrong ? Also thought you were liking the Lib Dems in the last few weeks and Jo Swinson !!
Sid, you are as perceptive as always. I do not rate Corbyn, but he is not incompetent. Johnson is incompetent and untrustworthy and the evidence for this is crystal.
The Lib Dems have shown consistency and purpose - Labour have not capitalised on the Brexit mess.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:53 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:46 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:40 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:28 am
You mean the aide who resigned for family reasons?
None of what you have stated above equals incompetence either. It comes across as bitterness without reason.
Quite sad really that prejudices can be so openly on display.
Going by previous posts you made in the past, thought you did not rate Corbyn , perhaps I got that wrong ? Also thought you were liking the Lib Dems in the last few weeks and Jo Swinson !!
Sid, you are as perceptive as always. I do not rate Corbyn, but he is not incompetent. Johnson is incompetent and untrustworthy and the evidence for this is crystal.
The Lib Dems have shown consistency and purpose - Labour have not capitalised on the Brexit mess.
Odd comments regarding incompetence. Bias rules, OK
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:57 am
by Disoriented
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:53 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:46 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:40 am
Going by previous posts you made in the past, thought you did not rate Corbyn , perhaps I got that wrong ? Also thought you were liking the Lib Dems in the last few weeks and Jo Swinson !!
Sid, you are as perceptive as always. I do not rate Corbyn, but he is not incompetent. Johnson is incompetent and untrustworthy and the evidence for this is crystal.
The Lib Dems have shown consistency and purpose - Labour have not capitalised on the Brexit mess.
Odd comments regarding incompetence. Bias rules, OK
How are they odd? You are failing to answer my questions. Your avoidance ‘tactic’ has been noted.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 12:31 pm
by Sid Bishop
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:46 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:40 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:28 am
You mean the aide who resigned for family reasons?
None of what you have stated above equals incompetence either. It comes across as bitterness without reason.
Quite sad really that prejudices can be so openly on display.
Going by previous posts you made in the past, thought you did not rate Corbyn , perhaps I got that wrong ? Also thought you were liking the Lib Dems in the last few weeks and Jo Swinson !!
Sid, you are as perceptive as always. I do not rate Corbyn, but he is not incompetent. Johnson is incompetent and untrustworthy and the evidence for this is crystal.
The Lib Dems have shown consistency and purpose - Labour have not capitalised on the Brexit mess.
I like the calmness of Corbyn and could imagine him as a nice next door neighbour, but I do not like the people he surrounds himself with and the momentum group etc. I used to vote labour when Wilson was the leader and my family voted for Attlee government after the war, Clement Attlee was such a man of principle. Going out now, have a good day !!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 12:34 pm
by Max B Gold
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 12:31 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:46 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:40 am
Going by previous posts you made in the past, thought you did not rate Corbyn , perhaps I got that wrong ? Also thought you were liking the Lib Dems in the last few weeks and Jo Swinson !!
Sid, you are as perceptive as always. I do not rate Corbyn, but he is not incompetent. Johnson is incompetent and untrustworthy and the evidence for this is crystal.
The Lib Dems have shown consistency and purpose - Labour have not capitalised on the Brexit mess.
I like the calmness of Corbyn and could imagine him as a nice next door neighbour, but I do not like the people he surrounds himself with and the momentum group etc. I used to vote labour when Wilson was the leader and my family voted for Attlee government after the war, Clement Attlee was such a man of principle. Going out now, have a good day !!
Atlee was a man of socialist principles as is Corbyn. They are not disimilar in personality. Quiet but absolutely driven to eradicate injustice.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:04 pm
by Orientinoz
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:08 am
Orientinoz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 am
He's right though Dis...I wouldn't trust Corby to run a bath let alone a country..
If your further response is you trust Johnson and the nasty party instead, you have written your own credibility epitaph.
Dis it is not for me to say, surely it is for the people to decide between Boris, Corby and others....So why dont you all have an election? I reckon you could do with a good clear out....a good dose of picolax..
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:27 pm
by Disoriented
Orientinoz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:04 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:08 am
Orientinoz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 am
He's right though Dis...I wouldn't trust Corby to run a bath let alone a country..
If your further response is you trust Johnson and the nasty party instead, you have written your own credibility epitaph.
Dis it is not for me to say, surely it is for the people to decide between Boris, Corby and others....So why dont you all have an election? I reckon you could do with a good clear out....a good dose of picolax..
If you follow British politics, all is clear why the opposition parties have not supported it. Yet.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:21 pm
by Thor
Yes dis it’s becuase the tories will romp home. Corbyn has called for an election for 2 years, he is presented with one and he bottles it. Enough said.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:27 pm
by Disoriented
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:21 pm
Yes dis it’s becuase the tories will romp home. Corbyn has called for an election for 2 years, he is presented with one and he bottles it. Enough said.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:48 pm
by Beradogs
Corbyn wants to ban private schools. Enforced distribution or communism by any other name.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:19 pm
by Thor
I know it’s disgraceful, yet Corbyn fails to say he had a private education himself. Hypocrisy of the highest order.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:39 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:48 pm
Corbyn wants to ban private schools. Enforced distribution or communism by any other name.
Communism. No need of any other name.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:45 am
by Mikero
" But he takes a position and goes for it full pelt. No ambiguity. Called being a leader. "
Like the first sheep up the ramp of the truck to the abattoir?
Mikero
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 7:53 am
by Real Al
Those 'leaders' who decided to go over the top when it was pretty obviously suicidal, tended to get shot in the back by their 'followers'.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:59 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:19 pm
I know it’s disgraceful, yet Corbyn fails to say he had a private education himself. Hypocrisy of the highest order.
He was a kid back then, as far as I’m aware.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:17 am
by Thor
Yeah he was, or Dianne Abbott who sent her children to private education, but has said over the weekend that they should be scrapped. Another hypocrite. Another do as I say not as I do person.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:21 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:17 am
Yeah he was, or Dianne Abbott who sent her children to private education, but has said over the weekend that they should be scrapped. Another hypocrite. Another do as I say not as I do person.
But she won't be able to do it anymore when they're scrapped.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:27 am
by Thor
Shouldn't be scrapped, it should be people's
choice to choose how to educate their children, just like half the shadow cabnet choose.
What I agree with is improving the schools and the standard of teachers. It's just a shame they never did it when last in power.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:33 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:27 am
Shouldn't be scrapped, it should be people's
choice to choose how to educate their children, just like half the shadow cabnet choose.
What I agree with is improving the schools and the standard of teachers. It's just a shame they never did it when last in power.
Of course they should be scrapped. Why should one child receive a better education than another child simply because that child has richer parents? That's ridiculous.
Imagine trying to compare Bliars new labour with Jezza's incarnation.