Page 230 of 249
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:19 am
by Hoover Attack
Truly abhorrent:
Separately in April 2018 he also shared a quote from a Jewish historian that said "the real issue... is that right-wing Jews in the Labour party and outside the party object to the fact that Jeremy Corbyn is a consistent supporter of Palestinian rights".
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:59 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:19 am
Truly abhorrent:
Separately in April 2018 he also shared a quote from a Jewish historian that said "the real issue... is that right-wing Jews in the Labour party and outside the party object to the fact that Jeremy Corbyn is a consistent supporter of Palestinian rights".
Standing up for what’s right was his downfall.
And then we all moan about how morally bankrupt all the MPs are.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 10:32 am
by Hoover Attack
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:59 am
Standing up for what’s right was his downfall.
No, he's been sacked for Anti Semitism, sharing a tweet from a Jewish historian which stood up for Corbyn.
I truly feel for the long standing Labour members and supporters having to see this happen to their party.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 10:46 am
by Max B Gold
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 10:32 am
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:59 am
Standing up for what’s right was his downfall.
No, he's been sacked for Anti Semitism, sharing a tweet from a Jewish historian which stood up for Corbyn.
I truly feel for the long standing Labour members and supporters having to see this happen to their party.
Looks like Labour's investment in employing the ex Israeli spy to trawl social media for dissenters is paying off.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:03 am
by Qin
Seems to me, Labour's nothing at all like the party it was founded as 120+ years ago. A party to represent the poor, disadvantaged, trade unions etc .
It represents the bankers, corporations, the privileged etc now.
Starmers a lucky guy, because the Tories have collapsed, and he's the beneficiary, not because his sparkling personality has engaged people
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:02 am
by Hoover Attack
You left out billionaires and private healthcare profiteers.
On that note, good to see the Labour candidate for Islington is running scared
https://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/news ... MTZieXRlcw
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2024 2:04 pm
by ChorizO
Qin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:03 am
Seems to me, Labour's nothing at all like the party it was founded as 120+ years ago. A party to represent the poor, disadvantaged, trade unions etc .
It represents the bankers, corporations, the privileged etc now.
Starmers a lucky guy, because the Tories have collapsed, and he's the beneficiary, not because his sparkling personality has engaged people
What are you on about?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2024 3:38 pm
by Qin
ChorizO wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 2:04 pm
Qin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:03 am
Seems to me, Labour's nothing at all like the party it was founded as 120+ years ago. A party to represent the poor, disadvantaged, trade unions etc .
It represents the bankers, corporations, the privileged etc now.
Starmers a lucky guy, because the Tories have collapsed, and he's the beneficiary, not because his sparkling personality has engaged people
What are you on about?
Read my post and you'll see "what I'm on about"
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:42 pm
by Max B Gold
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
When has Galloway ever been wrong?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 6:15 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:42 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
When has Galloway ever been wrong?
Well I hope he is on this occasion.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:35 pm
by Brigs
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
We're already at war with Russie
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:04 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Brigs wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:35 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
We're already at war with Russie
Yes but indirectly . Galloway meant directly .
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:33 pm
by BoniO
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:04 pm
Brigs wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:35 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
We're already at war with Russie
Yes but indirectly . Galloway meant directly .
Well, at worst his prediction has a 50:50 chance of being correct and with the current situation in Europe the odds of him being right are much higher. He’s hardly Nostradamus.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:43 pm
by Brigs
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:04 pm
Brigs wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:35 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 4:09 pm
Any comments about Galloway's prediction that if Starmer becomes our next Prime Minster this country will be dragged into a direct war with Russia within the next six months . ?
We're already at war with Russie
Yes but indirectly . Galloway meant directly .
Directly.
How many Cyber attacks are we under at the moment?
Only a matter of time before the bullets start flying
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:59 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Brigs wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:43 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:04 pm
Brigs wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:35 pm
We're already at war with Russie
Yes but indirectly . Galloway meant directly .
Directly.
How many Cyber attacks are we under at the moment?
Only a matter of time before the bullets start flying
That's what Galloway means
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 9:21 pm
by Brigs
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:59 pm
Brigs wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:43 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 8:04 pm
Yes but indirectly . Galloway meant directly .
Directly.
How many Cyber attacks are we under at the moment?
Only a matter of time before the bullets start flying
That's what Galloway means
Not just Galloway.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 6:55 am
by Dunners
Whether or not UK forces end up in a direct conflit with Russian forces, whoever occupies No.10 will make little difference.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 1:28 am
by E10EU
After all of Starmer's hot air about the House of Lords being bloated, based too much on party political affiliations and his intention to reduce it, here is another promise from him that no longer applies:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ar ... er-balance
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:26 am
by Qin
Under Starmer, it seems so many Conservative laws are being continued, by Labour according to the information I'm reading, it's as if Labour are continuaty Conservative.
When so many millionaires, and business leaders say they are voting Labour now, there's something wrong with Labour in my view
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:27 am
by Hoover Attack
Remember guys, this is just a ruse to get in power. Once he's got the keys to No. 10, we'll see the true Sirkieth.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:31 am
by Proposition Joe
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ar ... don-office
As said before, dislike Creasy and a lot of her personal policy positions (and not like she needs an excuse to make things about her...) but obviously behaviour like this is abhorrent and hope the bloke gets done for it.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:31 am
by Hoover Attack
Looks like he's got one of those Groucho Marx disguises on - they'll never find him.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 12:09 pm
by OyinbO
Dunners wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 6:55 am
Whether or not UK forces end up in a direct conflit with Russian forces, whoever occupies No.10 will make little difference.
Don't be so sure!
Farage.gif
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 12:29 pm
by Hoover Attack