Page 23 of 264

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:38 pm
by Mikero
McDonnell throws Scottish Labour under the bus, so much for fraternity.

Mikero

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 8:21 pm
by Max B Gold
Mikero wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:38 pm McDonnell throws Scottish Labour under the bus, so much for fraternity.

Mikero
I call it political realism. The Scotch Labour Party committed Hari-kari years ago.

If Labour want to be a force in an independent Scotland they need to get on board the freedom train.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:18 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
With Corbyn taking every opportunity to suggest a GE, even a week or so ago, isn’t it strange that when the opportunity arises he is not so keen.

We all know the reasons given, but the underlying reason must be that he feels Labour cannot win and by losing it will give Johnson the mandate to plough on with No deal.

Have Labour in general and Corbyn in particular accepted they cannot win a GE. That’s what it seems like to me.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:23 pm
by Long slender neck
Johnson could ensure no deal before a vote is even made as he could set or change the election date to after Oct 31

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:27 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:23 pm Johnson could ensure no deal before a vote is even made as he could set or change the election date to after Oct 31
Don’t really understand why Corbyn didn’t jump at the chance of a GE. He’s been seeking one for ever.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:29 pm
by Long slender neck
Must believe that blocking no deal is more important

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:48 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:29 pm Must believe that blocking no deal is more important
But winning an election would do exactly that for Corbyn. So he cannot be confident of winning at all. Hasn’t got the courage to go to the country.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:31 pm
by StillSpike
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:48 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:29 pm Must believe that blocking no deal is more important
But winning an election would do exactly that for Corbyn. So he cannot be confident of winning at all. Hasn’t got the courage to go to the country.
You've not been listening (or you've chosen to ignore what you've heard).

If Parly votes to allow a GE, then Johnson can play with the date and put it back beyond 31/10 while at the same time Parly shuts down so no more work can be done to stop no-deal. So even if Labour wins an election after 31/10, we're out with no-deal and we're all left to pick up the pieces.

Refusing a General Election until no-deal is impossible is the very definition of putting country before party. The very fact that the Tories are so desperately (and very childishly) trying to goad him into it shows how bad an idea it would be.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:45 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
StillSpike wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:31 pm
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:48 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:29 pm Must believe that blocking no deal is more important
But winning an election would do exactly that for Corbyn. So he cannot be confident of winning at all. Hasn’t got the courage to go to the country.
You've not been listening (or you've chosen to ignore what you've heard).

If Parly votes to allow a GE, then Johnson can play with the date and put it back beyond 31/10 while at the same time Parly shuts down so no more work can be done to stop no-deal. So even if Labour wins an election after 31/10, we're out with no-deal and we're all left to pick up the pieces.

Refusing a General Election until no-deal is impossible is the very definition of putting country before party. The very fact that the Tories are so desperately (and very childishly) trying to goad him into it shows how bad an idea it would be.
The GE was to decide who sat down with the EU to continue discussions, well assuming Boris wasn’t lying. 15 Oct was the date they voted on. With a change in leader all bets are off. Corbyn was talking about a GE a few days ago. Blair in a radio interview warned against it. Boris will play hard ball, even breaking the law to get what he wants,

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:50 pm
by StillSpike
Sigh.

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

"If Parly votes to allow a GE, then Johnson can play with the date and put it back beyond 31/10 while at the same time Parly shuts down so no more work can be done to stop no-deal"

Can you not just read and understand that sentence?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:56 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
StillSpike wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:50 pm Sigh.

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

"If Parly votes to allow a GE, then Johnson can play with the date and put it back beyond 31/10 while at the same time Parly shuts down so no more work can be done to stop no-deal"

Can you not just read and understand that sentence?
What I read on the BBC was that they voted for a snap GE on 15 Oct. The previous Monday Boris said he didn’t want a GE and Corbyn said he did. The snap election vote date was 15 Oct.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:00 pm
by StillSpike
Although the date 15/10 was "promised", there'd be nothing at all to stop Johnson just arbitrarily changing the date. You've said yourself that he'd break the law to get what he wants - why on earth would you think that he'd keep a promise to have the GE on 15/10, when he could easily just change the date to beyond 31/10 and get what he wanted. He'd then go into that Election as the PM who'd "delivered Brexit" (without the actual effects being evident just yet)

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:02 pm
by StillSpike
The very fact that he's desperate now for a GE (now that MPs have taken control of Parliament) shows how bad an idea it would be for the opposition to do anything that facilitates it until no-deal is categorically off the table.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:42 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
StillSpike wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:00 pm Although the date 15/10 was "promised", there'd be nothing at all to stop Johnson just arbitrarily changing the date. You've said yourself that he'd break the law to get what he wants - why on earth would you think that he'd keep a promise to have the GE on 15/10, when he could easily just change the date to beyond 31/10 and get what he wanted. He'd then go into that Election as the PM who'd "delivered Brexit" (without the actual effects being evident just yet)
Of course, I don’t trust any politician, but talk about changing dates is pure speculation and tbh I reckon he would have gone for it, a decent win puts him in a far stronger position to get a deal, a defeat and it’s no longer his problem. And I have little doubt he would have won, given all the spending stuff going on. Timing.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:48 pm
by StillSpike
Of course, you know better than the leaders of all the opposition parties whether or not he can be trusted. (They've all stated that their reason for not backing the GE call under FTPA last week was because they believed he'd change the date - and, as I explained above, that would be the easiest way of him getting his way.)

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:29 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
StillSpike wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:48 pm Of course, you know better than the leaders of all the opposition parties whether or not he can be trusted. (They've all stated that their reason for not backing the GE call under FTPA last week was because they believed he'd change the date - and, as I explained above, that would be the easiest way of him getting his way.)
What I don’t understand is that having thought through all the jiggers pokery options open to Boris, as you have elaborated, two days earlier JC was calling for a GE.

Why? Had he not considered all the points you mentioned? Was he blind to the possibilities you suggest, or was he just grandstanding. However you slice it, it is an amazing U-Turn.

Boris called his bluff and Corbyn folded. That’s why he has been subjected to the chicken comments. Corbyn misjudged the situation when he called for a GE that he didn’t really want, having no doubt thought about all the opportunities that may present to Boris. He gambled on Boris not suggesting a GE and he got it wrong.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:48 pm
by Disoriented
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:29 pm
StillSpike wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:48 pm Of course, you know better than the leaders of all the opposition parties whether or not he can be trusted. (They've all stated that their reason for not backing the GE call under FTPA last week was because they believed he'd change the date - and, as I explained above, that would be the easiest way of him getting his way.)
What I don’t understand is that having thought through all the jiggers pokery options open to Boris, as you have elaborated, two days earlier JC was calling for a GE.

Why? Had he not considered all the points you mentioned? Was he blind to the possibilities you suggest, or was he just grandstanding. However you slice it, it is an amazing U-Turn.

Boris called his bluff and Corbyn folded. That’s why he has been subjected to the chicken comments. Corbyn misjudged the situation when he called for a GE that he didn’t really want, having no doubt thought about all the opportunities that may present to Boris. He gambled on Boris not suggesting a GE and he got it wrong.
Can you not read? Saying ‘ I don’t understand’ repeatedly does not show you in the best light.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:55 pm
by Admin
He knows full well what he’s doing

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 8:27 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Relentless.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:07 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Disoriented wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:48 pm
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:29 pm
StillSpike wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 4:48 pm Of course, you know better than the leaders of all the opposition parties whether or not he can be trusted. (They've all stated that their reason for not backing the GE call under FTPA last week was because they believed he'd change the date - and, as I explained above, that would be the easiest way of him getting his way.)
What I don’t understand is that having thought through all the jiggers pokery options open to Boris, as you have elaborated, two days earlier JC was calling for a GE.

Why? Had he not considered all the points you mentioned? Was he blind to the possibilities you suggest, or was he just grandstanding. However you slice it, it is an amazing U-Turn.

Boris called his bluff and Corbyn folded. That’s why he has been subjected to the chicken comments. Corbyn misjudged the situation when he called for a GE that he didn’t really want, having no doubt thought about all the opportunities that may present to Boris. He gambled on Boris not suggesting a GE and he got it wrong.
Can you not read? Saying ‘ I don’t understand’ repeatedly does not show you in the best light.
Why? Are you so clever you understand everything? If so well done.

Me. I have the confidence, maturity and wisdom to know I don’t understand everything and am not embarrassed to better my understand by entering into debate. It’s a grown up sort of thing. I thought you would understand that.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:12 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
They’ve spelt it out above in simple terms that a 5 year old could understand.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:30 am
by Disoriented
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:07 pm
Disoriented wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:48 pm
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:29 pm

What I don’t understand is that having thought through all the jiggers pokery options open to Boris, as you have elaborated, two days earlier JC was calling for a GE.

Why? Had he not considered all the points you mentioned? Was he blind to the possibilities you suggest, or was he just grandstanding. However you slice it, it is an amazing U-Turn.

Boris called his bluff and Corbyn folded. That’s why he has been subjected to the chicken comments. Corbyn misjudged the situation when he called for a GE that he didn’t really want, having no doubt thought about all the opportunities that may present to Boris. He gambled on Boris not suggesting a GE and he got it wrong.
Can you not read? Saying ‘ I don’t understand’ repeatedly does not show you in the best light.
Why? Are you so clever you understand everything? If so well done.

Me. I have the confidence, maturity and wisdom to know I don’t understand everything and am not embarrassed to better my understand by entering into debate. It’s a grown up sort of thing. I thought you would understand that.
😅

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2019 3:51 pm
by PAM
Corbyn falls to a record lowest ever satisfaftion rating ever recorded in 42 years.

After 9 years of opposition

After 9 years of austerity

After everything that has happened with the government Image

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:15 pm
by Disoriented
dOh Nut wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:18 pm With Corbyn taking every opportunity to suggest a GE, even a week or so ago, isn’t it strange that when the opportunity arises he is not so keen.

We all know the reasons given, but the underlying reason must be that he feels Labour cannot win and by losing it will give Johnson the mandate to plough on with No deal.

Have Labour in general and Corbyn in particular accepted they cannot win a GE. That’s what it seems like to me.
What it ‘seems like to you’ is way off reality. Best to not comment on things you do not understand.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 am
by Orientinoz
He's right though Dis...I wouldn't trust Corby to run a bath let alone a country..