Page 216 of 268

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 12:15 pm
by Friend or fart
Media working overtime to try to embarrass. Spending very many minutes grilling Labour people on what is a Socialist? Yeah that's really important to the Electorate innit? Then the pundits have this sudden concern for Diane Abbott's welfare, when they have spent most of their time trivialising her. Still it all takes the limelight away from the Tories pecadillos ( mind you some of them are much greater sinners ). Then we have the pseudo left wingers on here, doing their bit for the Tories too.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 12:22 pm
by Proposition Joe
Ah yeah, I forgot the man who wants to be the next PM should be allowed to lie with impunity because Sensible.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 12:29 pm
by Long slender neck
If he expels her she might stand against Labour.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 12:53 pm
by Hoover Attack
Proposition Joe wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 12:06 pm Then have the balls to expel her rather than hiding behind an "ongoing" process be knows full well has finished months ago. He's a repeatedly proven liar.
This.

It's not even that he's a liar, he's just a nasty ****.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 12:57 pm
by Long slender neck
Why?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 1:06 pm
by Proposition Joe
Long slender neck wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 12:29 pm If he expels her she might stand against Labour.
So? If he thinks he's right to expel her then he should be confident his chosen replacement would beat her in the marketplace of ideas, same as is happening in Islington North.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 1:42 pm
by Friend or fart
So PJ & Hoover Attack working hard to maintain the Tories in power. God! How far do you want the UK driven into the ground. Stop staring at your keyboards & take a look at what is going on around you. This Country is a disaster zone.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 1:48 pm
by Proposition Joe
What a silly post from a very silly Boarder.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 2:53 pm
by Friend or fart
PJ:-What a silly post from a very silly Boarder.
Friend or faux:- Loses an argument resorts to insults. Time to grow up mate!

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 2:56 pm
by Hoover Attack
Long slender neck wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 12:57 pm Why?
I dont know. Maybe because he didn't get enough hugs from his poor dad, stuck in that factory 20 hours a day making tools?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 3:11 pm
by Proposition Joe
Friend or faux wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 2:53 pm PJ:-What a silly post from a very silly Boarder.
Friend or faux:- Loses an argument resorts to insults. Time to grow up mate!
What argument have I lost, pray tell? You've not actually responded to the issue raised, or otherwise simply confirmed that you have no problem with Starmer lying to the media (and the electorate), so it's hard to see how you think you have "won" anything here. What a silly post.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 3:58 pm
by Friend or fart
PJ keep your silly school playground stuff for the school playground.
More importantly: The Manchester Ole Bill are reporting they have nothing of any consequence on Angela Rayner ( now there's a surprise ).

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 4:17 pm
by Max B Gold
Friend or faux wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 3:58 pm PJ keep your silly school playground stuff for the school playground.
More importantly: The Manchester Ole Bill are reporting they have nothing of any consequence on Angela Rayner ( now there's a surprise ).
She is guilty though.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 4:57 pm
by Proposition Joe
Friend or faux wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 3:58 pm PJ keep your silly school playground stuff for the school playground.
More importantly: The Manchester Ole Bill are reporting they have nothing of any consequence on Angela Rayner ( now there's a surprise ).
Prospective PMs lying is playground stuff, is it? Have you said the same about the Tories, out of interest?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 5:02 pm
by Long slender neck
Whats the lie?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 5:19 pm
by Admin
Long slender neck wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 5:02 pm Whats the lie?
His response when asked if Abbott's case was resolved and would she have the whip returned has always been something along the lines of claiming her case was still ongoing via internal independent processes which SKS couldn't comment on.

It's now being reported that this process finished 5 months ago and she was given a formal warning and had to complete an online anti semitism course (which she apparently did in Feb).

Which of course begs the question as to why she's not had the whip returned (particularly when other MP's have for other offences). I think everyone can have a reasonable guess why she's not had it returned but if the reports are correct then Starmer looks more than a little dishonest.

Regardless of your political leanings, it's not a good look for the likely next PM.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 5:23 pm
by Admin
Proposition Joe wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 12:06 pm Then have the balls to expel her rather than hiding behind an "ongoing" process he knows full well has finished months ago. He's a repeatedly proven liar.
Hard to argue with this. Although I'm sure there's plenty of centerist dad's who'll come up with some mental gymnastics to provide a reason for it.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 6:06 pm
by Long slender neck
I guess its a lie although I'd have to see him quoted and even then its not a big one or about something most people care about.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 6:11 pm
by Hoover Attack
Admin wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 5:23 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 12:06 pm Then have the balls to expel her rather than hiding behind an "ongoing" process he knows full well has finished months ago. He's a repeatedly proven liar.
Hard to argue with this. Although I'm sure there's plenty of centerist dad's who'll come up with some mental gymnastics to provide a reason for it.
If you change dunnems name to Centrist Dad, I will donate to that begging page for this site.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 6:15 pm
by Admin
Long slender neck wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 6:06 pm I guess its a lie although I'd have to see him quoted and even then its not a big one or about something most people care about.
Size doesn't matter.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 6:19 pm
by Admin
Hoover Attack wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 6:11 pm
Admin wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 5:23 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 12:06 pm Then have the balls to expel her rather than hiding behind an "ongoing" process he knows full well has finished months ago. He's a repeatedly proven liar.
Hard to argue with this. Although I'm sure there's plenty of centerist dad's who'll come up with some mental gymnastics to provide a reason for it.
If you change dunnems name to Centrist Dad, I will donate to that begging page for this site.
£20 for the above.

Other changes available upon request.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 6:39 pm
by Max B Gold
Morons


Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 9:00 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
The BBC understands Abbott has been readmitted to the party

She had been suspended after suggesting in April last year that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people do not face racism "all their lives"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-69063295

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 10:39 pm
by Hoover Attack
Amazingly enough they’ve let her back in after the leak.

But still to be confirmed that she can’t stand.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Tue May 28, 2024 10:42 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Hoover Attack wrote: Tue May 28, 2024 10:39 pm Amazingly enough they’ve let her back in after the leak.

But still to be confirmed that she can’t stand.
She can’t

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/06fc ... 93d41db316