Page 22 of 91
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:19 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:18 pm
I remain bemused by your “wum” which seems to have amounted to “adopt a position you actually hold, more or less, and make up a lie to support it, have your points argued in good faith”. Reminds me of when Rio Ferdinand “merked” Gary Neville with a speeding ticket and Neville just dealt with it head on as if true and was like “yeah, send me the paperwork, I’m not giving you a photo to be let off, I’d rather pay the fine”
I know you were bemused. It came through in the personal abuse you resorted too.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:21 pm
by CEB
Oh, I didn’t resort to it, I elevated to it when it became the most appropriate response to your brain farts. As I said, I’m not sure “lol I played the role of a complete fool and CEB bought it” is quite the win you think it was. You had me so convinced of your foolishness that I confess to, even now, thinking you a fool
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:18 pm
by Dunners
Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:48 pm
Story of O wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:40 pm
What exactly is "female behaviour"?
It's when you do your hair up, put on a bit of lippy, slip on the high-heels and short skirt, and then strut your stuff down the street with a soundtrack of builders' wolf-whistles.
Kat Slater, here, demonstrating an alternative/modern take on female behaviour.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:26 pm
by Long slender neck
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-61880709
Elon Musk's transgender daughter has applied to legally change her name and gender, saying she no longer wants to "be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form".
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:29 pm
by CEB
Elon Musk’s son deciding he’s a woman is just about the most predictable bit of rebellion by an extremely privileged but f***ed up teenager imaginable
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:36 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:29 pm
Elon Musk’s son deciding he’s a woman is just about the most predictable bit of rebellion by an extremely privileged but f***ed up teenager imaginable
Let's all pile on and hate the extremely privileged and f*cked up. Woohoo - call DCI Pete Dickman of the Genital Police he hates them too.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:37 pm
by CEB
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:36 pm
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:29 pm
Elon Musk’s son deciding he’s a woman is just about the most predictable bit of rebellion by an extremely privileged but f***ed up teenager imaginable
Let's all pile on and hate the extremely privileged and f*cked up. Woohoo - call DCI Pete Dickman of the Genital Police he hates them too.
I don’t think that Xae 3 ¥? reads this board, Max’yyy
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:39 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:37 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:36 pm
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:29 pm
Elon Musk’s son deciding he’s a woman is just about the most predictable bit of rebellion by an extremely privileged but f***ed up teenager imaginable
Let's all pile on and hate the extremely privileged and f*cked up. Woohoo - call DCI Pete Dickman of the Genital Police he hates them too.
I don’t think that Xae 3 ¥? reads this board, Max’yyy
Now you've got me. Who he/she, them/they it?
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:41 pm
by CEB
Yes, it seems that as throughout this thread, you’re not even aware of the basic terms of what’s being discussed. But good job on the wumming.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:45 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:41 pm
Yes, it seems that as throughout this thread, you’re not even aware of the basic terms of what’s being discussed. But good job on the wumming.
At least I can take some small consolation from the fact I'm blinded by science and not obsessive hatred.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:48 pm
by CEB
Ah, you’re mentioning science without knowing what science is relevant, it must be after 2 pm and you must have started on the sauce
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:17 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:48 pm
Ah, you’re mentioning science without knowing what science is relevant, it must be after 2 pm and you must have started on the sauce
Of course I don't know what science is relevant I'm not a piggy eyed obsessive trans hating Keyboard Warriams.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:19 pm
by CEB
It’s genuinely fascinating to see someone so determined that they’re right and yet so comfortable with not knowing anything whatsoever about the subject they’re apparently right about. I say fascinating, but tiresome is probably more accurate. At least Brendan commits to the idiocy of his position
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:07 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:19 pm
It’s genuinely fascinating to see someone so determined that they’re right and yet so comfortable with not knowing anything whatsoever about the subject they’re apparently right about. I say fascinating, but tiresome is probably more accurate. At least Brendan commits to the idiocy of his position
Remind you of any other Boarder. Past or present?
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:32 pm
by CEB
Hmmmm
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:40 pm
by Dunners
Can't decide if "womb-carriers" is better or worse than "bodies with vaginas".
Still, at least Verso Books are being kind.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:44 pm
by CEB
Absolutely. I’m glad that they’re not blinded by hatred of a marginalised community like I am
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:45 pm
by Paddy
"womb-carriers". I think we hit a new low with that one!
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:56 pm
by CEB
The maddest thing is that if the phrase actually caught on, and women started routinely using “womb carriers” to describe themselves, then trans activists would seek to appropriate that term, too.
(After all, what is the demand for male people in women’s sport if not “members of the sex that doesn’t carry wombs wanting to be included in the category that does”?)
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:58 pm
by Long slender neck
The womb carriers 200m freestyle
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:06 pm
by CEB
Trans womb-men are womb-men
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:37 pm
by Dunners
The Science and Industry Museum in Manchester being kind, and giving this young lady a free gawp at some fella's todger.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:57 pm
by Max Fowler
The stick person on the right of the three looks proper sassy.
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:09 pm
by Paddy
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:57 pm
The stick person on the right of the three looks proper sassy.
Picture clearly taken on a windy day. Or is he hiding a microwave hes nicked?
Re: The trans debate
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:19 am
by Long slender neck
Wonder what Howard thinks?