Page 208 of 265
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:40 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:35 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:23 pm
60% of the country are neutral or approve of him, I’m sure he’s absolutely bricking it
Yeah but 65% of the country don’t approve of him…
If you include “Neither approve nor disapprove” in “don’t approve”
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:41 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
CEB wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:39 pm
Now do voting intentions
And approval ratings for Sunak, Boris, Corbyn, Davy, Count Binface
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:43 pm
by Max B Gold
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:35 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:23 pm
60% of the country are neutral or approve of him, I’m sure he’s absolutely bricking it
Yeah but 65% of the country don’t approve of him…
Correct. He's a busted flush and needs to go.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:13 pm
by Hoover Attack
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:40 pm
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:35 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:23 pm
60% of the country are neutral or approve of him, I’m sure he’s absolutely bricking it
Yeah but 65% of the country don’t approve of him…
If you include “Neither approve nor disapprove” in “don’t approve”
That's right, I've included the people that do not approve of him when working out the %age of people that don't approve of him.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:16 pm
by Proposition Joe
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:41 pm
CEB wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:39 pm
Now do voting intentions
And approval ratings for Sunak, Boris, Corbyn, Davy, Count Binface
Binface has got to be quite high, no?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:58 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:16 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:41 pm
CEB wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:39 pm
Now do voting intentions
And approval ratings for Sunak, Boris, Corbyn, Davy, Count Binface
Binface has got to be quite high, no?
I’d imagine his net approval will be amongst the highest in the UK
Given don’t knows don’t count either way, nobody dislikes him and some people think he’s a laugh
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 2:06 pm
by Max B Gold
Despite having a charmless leader that nobody likes it looks like the Red Tories are on course for a landslide. Personally I believe that's due to the Tories being so corrupt, hateful and useless and nothing to do with Mr Charisma, Tel Aviv Keith.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 2:27 pm
by BoniO
I think way too much emphasis is placed on “charisma”, this isn’t Britains got Talent.
Trump is charismatic, Boris is charismatic, Farage is charismatic and what a bunch of lying, cheating, corrupt a-holes they are.
Give me a boring b*stard who’s honest and knows how to do the job.
PS - regrettably, I’m not at all sure that’s the current Labour Leader - well he’s half way there…
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:14 pm
by Dunners
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 2:06 pm
Personally I believe that's due to the Tories being so corrupt, hateful and useless and nothing to do with Mr Charisma, Tel Aviv Keith.
Yep. That, and not being daft enough to implement an election strategy optimised for Proportional Representation when it's a FPTP system you need to navigate to win.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 8:09 pm
by Max B Gold
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:14 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 2:06 pm
Personally I believe that's due to the Tories being so corrupt, hateful and useless and nothing to do with Mr Charisma, Tel Aviv Keith.
Yep. That, and not being daft enough to implement an election strategy optimised for Proportional Representation when it's a FPTP system you need to navigate to win.
Whatever
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:11 am
by E10EU
Now one of Starmer's star players in his shadow cabinet is showing what New New Labour really is about.
Wes Streeting now in fighting mode to get more and more 'private health care' (aka 'for profit') accepted as the norm. Just like the best Tories, he labels any opponents "middle class lefties", the favoured language used by Tories and Faragists to ridicule, slag off, undermine.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... eting-says
... says the man who is sponsored in his electioneering by those companies who will profit.
The most sickening line is his claim that it's "to stop working class families being left behind".
It's a line used by all parties as an emotional manipulative trigger, but in reality usually quite meaningless.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:46 am
by E10EU
This is a very interesting thread, started 207 pages and 5 years ago, almost to the day with a comment about Corbyn.
And now Biden is catching up.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/ ... ge-charges
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 10:53 am
by Hoover Attack
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 11:22 am
by Max B Gold
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:19 pm
by Dunners
Labour shills in the media going into full-on "what about Terry" mode on this. Very entertaining.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:26 pm
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:19 pm
Labour shills in the media
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 10:46 pm
by Stowaway
She’s taking the same tack as Serkier did during Currygate. She knows she’s in the clear so can offer to resign all she likes, while making the Tories look bad. It’s a good move.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 9:09 am
by Friend or fart
After listening to sensible Political commentating on the BBC it seems this is a case of " Move along, nothing to see here". More to the point, will Super Grass Tory deputy chairman James Daly, be later charged with wasting Police time?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 9:36 am
by faldO
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 9:09 am
After listening to sensible Political commentating on the BBC it seems this is a case of " Move along, nothing to see here".
Yes, thank goodness for the sensible political commentating on the BBC, and well done to them for sticking up for one of their own.
As David Lammy said this week, Angela Rayner has done nothing wrong and should not even have to face this kind of investigation, what with her being a northern woman and not in government.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:08 am
by Friend or fart
faldO:-Yes, thank goodness for the sensible political commentating on the BBC, and well done to them for sticking up for one of their own.
Strangely BBC just published a piece by Laura Kuenssberg doing a hatchet job on Rayner. Accusing her of being: a woman who drinks and smokes and makes jokes, makes no secret of enjoying a night out, boasting once of going out from 4pm until 6am. Always safer to get a woman to attack another woman.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:21 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Properly mental this is getting the coverage it is considering all the multi million quid stealing on the other side of the bench
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:50 am
by Friend or fart
Well, the coverage she is getting is incredibly mealy mouthed and difficult to see what the actual accusations are. As far as I can deduce, they have given up on her being a tax avoiding scoundrel and are now accusing her of putting a wrong address on her election application. There is even talk of the whole issue not being raised in the appropriate timescale. Personally she i think she was bang on with her " Tories are scum".
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed May 01, 2024 8:29 pm
by Dunners
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:36 pm
Interesting to see that a few boarders think Galloway is a ****
To me, this means he must be good, if this message boards contributors think he's a ****
He has his faults, but i was hoping he would win, and for a few months at least, we may have some fun in the HOC
Having fun with a few of his faults here.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed May 01, 2024 8:39 pm
by Rubex Kube
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed May 01, 2024 8:29 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:36 pm
Interesting to see that a few boarders think Galloway is a ****
To me, this means he must be good, if this message boards contributors think he's a ****
He has his faults, but i was hoping he would win, and for a few months at least, we may have some fun in the HOC
Having fun with a few of his faults here.
Galloway on the Labour thread?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu May 02, 2024 3:24 pm
by Max B Gold
Despise the man. Big mistake campaigning for him in the 1987 GE.
To be fair though I spent more time on the doorstep selling copies of the Militant than I did canvassing for the Gorgeous one.