Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:16 am

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:54 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:21 pm

There is no need to wear face masks outside.

What planet are you on?

The realistic planet, unlike you.
Walking around in the fresh air wearing a filthy face mask.
How pathetic.
There is no evidence that wearing one of these cheap lumps of cloth makes any difference, in fact it could make matters worst by breathing in stale air.
Besides, there is no rule that you need to wear them outside.

Wearing a filthy mask? Then change it daily or is that too much for you to comprehend?

Any wonder we have the worst death rate in Europe with denyists like you.

Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 3:03 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:16 am

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:54 pm

What planet are you on?

The realistic planet, unlike you.
Walking around in the fresh air wearing a filthy face mask.
How pathetic.
There is no evidence that wearing one of these cheap lumps of cloth makes any difference, in fact it could make matters worst by breathing in stale air.
Besides, there is no rule that you need to wear them outside.

Wearing a filthy mask? Then change it daily or is that too much for you to comprehend?

Any wonder we have the worst death rate in Europe with denyists like you.

What part of no medical evidence do you not get.
The average non medical mask is useless.
In fact there is no great evidence that a average medical mask is much better.
What nonsense, sit in a football ground with a mask on.

Still wrong....Are you still here? I would have thought that now you cover has been blown, you would have been recalled to North Korea for an appointment with a missile. Even more deadly than Covid 19.

Ornchurch wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:43 am

JimbO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:32 am
Know a few people who aren't sending their kids back this week to protect them for xmas.

TBF all schools should shut this week.

They have all finished today. Can get the rationale behind it but to give people less than 24hrs to organise childcare is appalling typical Waltham Forest Council though.

No medical evidence for masks, huh?

You'd better not read this then
https://files.fast.ai/papers/masks_lit_review.pdf

Clive Evans wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:18 pm Still wrong....Are you still here? I would have thought that now you cover has been blown, you would have been recalled to North Korea for an appointment with a missile. Even more deadly than Covid 19.

That won’t be anything to worry about then.
Still fretting over this virus which is no problem to 99.7% of the population?

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:24 pm

Clive Evans wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:18 pm Still wrong....Are you still here? I would have thought that now you cover has been blown, you would have been recalled to North Korea for an appointment with a missile. Even more deadly than Covid 19.

That won’t be anything to worry about then.
Still fretting over this virus which is no problem to 99.7% of the population?

Or to rephrase you could ask him if he is still worrying about 200,000 of his fellow Brits? And the answer is obviously yes.

JimbO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:21 pm

Ornchurch wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:43 am

JimbO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:32 am
Know a few people who aren't sending their kids back this week to protect them for xmas.

TBF all schools should shut this week.

They have all finished today. Can get the rationale behind it but to give people less than 24hrs to organise childcare is appalling typical Waltham Forest Council though.

Theres more to life than Waltham Forest. My kids are still breaking up on Thurs and Fri as planned.

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:28 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:24 pm

Clive Evans wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:18 pm Still wrong....Are you still here? I would have thought that now you cover has been blown, you would have been recalled to North Korea for an appointment with a missile. Even more deadly than Covid 19.

That won’t be anything to worry about then.
Still fretting over this virus which is no problem to 99.7% of the population?

Or to rephrase you could ask him if he is still worrying about 200,000 of his fellow Brits? And the answer is obviously yes.

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:59 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:28 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:24 pm

That won’t be anything to worry about then.
Still fretting over this virus which is no problem to 99.7% of the population?

Or to rephrase you could ask him if he is still worrying about 200,000 of his fellow Brits? And the answer is obviously yes.

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

You can get another job or home, but life is a one off gig.
I know which two of them I would rather lose

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:59 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:28 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:24 pm

That won’t be anything to worry about then.
Still fretting over this virus which is no problem to 99.7% of the population?

Or to rephrase you could ask him if he is still worrying about 200,000 of his fellow Brits? And the answer is obviously yes.

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

I feel terribly for them too. There isn't a good solution but I think most people would put their life ahead of their job or home.

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:07 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:59 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:28 pm

Or to rephrase you could ask him if he is still worrying about 200,000 of his fellow Brits? And the answer is obviously yes.

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

You can get another job or home, but life is a one off gig.
I know which two of them I would rather lose

Are you in the high risk group then?

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:32 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:59 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:28 pm

Or to rephrase you could ask him if he is still worrying about 200,000 of his fellow Brits? And the answer is obviously yes.

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

I feel terribly for them too. There isn't a good solution but I think most people would put their life ahead of their job or home.

Most people won’t die of this virus, and almost no one under the age of 60.

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:36 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:32 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:59 pm

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

I feel terribly for them too. There isn't a good solution but I think most people would put their life ahead of their job or home.

Most people won’t die of this virus, and almost no one under the age of 60.

Everyone knows that. But 200,000 dead people is pretty big, huh?

And I know 'what about lockdowns and mental health?' 'what about cancers and treatment?!'. Again, there's no good answer, but some worse than others. You don't need to minimise the severity of the illness for a significant minority, people know they are likely going to be fine. But hundreds of thousands definitely won't.

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:36 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:32 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:59 pm

What about the millions of people who are losing their jobs and homes?

I feel terribly for them too. There isn't a good solution but I think most people would put their life ahead of their job or home.

Most people won’t die of this virus, and almost no one under the age of 60.

Most people won't lose their job or home especially the latter.
No more stats to back that statement up than you, but since when did that matter

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:43 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:36 pm

PoliticOs wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:32 pm

I feel terribly for them too. There isn't a good solution but I think most people would put their life ahead of their job or home.

Most people won’t die of this virus, and almost no one under the age of 60.

Most people won't lose their job or home especially the latter.
No more stats to back that statement up than you, but since when did that matter

Most people?
Yep, what’s a couple of million.
Oh and how are they going to live?
Still not to worry, let’s shut everything down until it goes away.
I wonder how we will pay for the NHS?

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:49 pm

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:43 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:36 pm
Most people won’t die of this virus, and almost no one under the age of 60.

Most people won't lose their job or home especially the latter.
No more stats to back that statement up than you, but since when did that matter

Most people?
Yep, what’s a couple of million.
Oh and how are they going to live?
Still not to worry, let’s shut everything down until it goes away.
I wonder how we will pay for the NHS?

They are going to live which is a 100% improvement on the 200K that didn't

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:57 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:49 pm

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:43 pm

Most people won't lose their job or home especially the latter.
No more stats to back that statement up than you, but since when did that matter

Most people?
Yep, what’s a couple of million.
Oh and how are they going to live?
Still not to worry, let’s shut everything down until it goes away.
I wonder how we will pay for the NHS?

They are going to live which is a 100% improvement on the 200K that didn't

Are they?
No suicides, no stress related illnesses?
Are the hospitals being overrun?

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:49 pm

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:43 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:36 pm
Most people won’t die of this virus, and almost no one under the age of 60.

Most people won't lose their job or home especially the latter.
No more stats to back that statement up than you, but since when did that matter

Most people?
Yep, what’s a couple of million.
Oh and how are they going to live?
Still not to worry, let’s shut everything down until it goes away.
I wonder how we will pay for the NHS?

The tories borrowed a load in march/april
Let them go borrow some more.

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 6:13 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:49 pm

one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:43 pm

Most people won't lose their job or home especially the latter.
No more stats to back that statement up than you, but since when did that matter

Most people?
Yep, what’s a couple of million.
Oh and how are they going to live?
Still not to worry, let’s shut everything down until it goes away.
I wonder how we will pay for the NHS?

The tories borrowed a load in march/april
Let them go borrow some more.

You do realise it’s not government’s money?
Where do you think it comes from?

Would you be willing to lockdown for other things where a minority would be at risk of dying?

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 6:26 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 6:13 pm

Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:49 pm

Most people?
Yep, what’s a couple of million.
Oh and how are they going to live?
Still not to worry, let’s shut everything down until it goes away.
I wonder how we will pay for the NHS?

The tories borrowed a load in march/april
Let them go borrow some more.

You do realise it’s not government’s money?
Where do you think it comes from?

Dunno fella
I sign on


Id love to see your notification tag
Bet its lit up like a covid temperature
Over a 100 a day

200000 dead? Have I missed something?

Story of O wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:47 pm 200000 dead? Have I missed something?

Probably reading the scientist inflated figures.

Still around 300 a day dying in hospitals in England. Surprised it isn't higher by now.