Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:43 pm
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Do you ever read any of the little leaflets inside aThor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 5:52 am Here is an article which says you should take the vaccine, but you must be prepared for the initial side effects and reactions to the jab. Having read it, surely the producers should be advising this is what might happen....otherwise they will run the risk of people saying I’m not having that after friends experience xyz.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6520/1022
Interested to see the government’s approach to this and what leaflet or information will be given before getting the vaccinetuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:35 amDo you ever read any of the little leaflets inside aThor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 5:52 am Here is an article which says you should take the vaccine, but you must be prepared for the initial side effects and reactions to the jab. Having read it, surely the producers should be advising this is what might happen....otherwise they will run the risk of people saying I’m not having that after friends experience xyz.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6520/1022
box of tablets Thory ?
You should, they tell you all about possible.side effects &
what you should do just in case they last 24 hours or longer .
If you buy a box of aspirin it tells you it
Can cause bleeding in the stomach to Anaphylaxis .
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1598 ... ideeffects
Won’t be a long one.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:00 amInterested to see the government’s approach to this and what leaflet or information will be given before getting the vaccinetuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:35 amDo you ever read any of the little leaflets inside aThor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 5:52 am Here is an article which says you should take the vaccine, but you must be prepared for the initial side effects and reactions to the jab. Having read it, surely the producers should be advising this is what might happen....otherwise they will run the risk of people saying I’m not having that after friends experience xyz.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6520/1022
box of tablets Thory ?
You should, they tell you all about possible.side effects &
what you should do just in case they last 24 hours or longer .
If you buy a box of aspirin it tells you it
Can cause bleeding in the stomach to Anaphylaxis .
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1598 ... ideeffects
Surely.that will be down to pfizer oxford & the other lotApple Wumble wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:00 amInterested to see the government’s approach to this and what leaflet or information will be given before getting the vaccinetuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:35 amDo you ever read any of the little leaflets inside aThor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 5:52 am Here is an article which says you should take the vaccine, but you must be prepared for the initial side effects and reactions to the jab. Having read it, surely the producers should be advising this is what might happen....otherwise they will run the risk of people saying I’m not having that after friends experience xyz.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6520/1022
box of tablets Thory ?
You should, they tell you all about possible.side effects &
what you should do just in case they last 24 hours or longer .
If you buy a box of aspirin it tells you it
Can cause bleeding in the stomach to Anaphylaxis .
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1598 ... ideeffects
Maybe. But this is a vaccine being rolled out by the government. I'd assume once they've bought it, its on them to tell people information about it before they take it.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:40 amSurely.that will be down to pfizer oxford & the other lotApple Wumble wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:00 amInterested to see the government’s approach to this and what leaflet or information will be given before getting the vaccinetuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:35 am
Do you ever read any of the little leaflets inside a
box of tablets Thory ?
You should, they tell you all about possible.side effects &
what you should do just in case they last 24 hours or longer .
If you buy a box of aspirin it tells you it
Can cause bleeding in the stomach to Anaphylaxis .
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1598 ... ideeffects
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:42 amMaybe. But this is a vaccine being rolled out by the government. I'd assume once they've bought it, its on them to tell people information about it before they take it.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:40 amSurely.that will be down to pfizer oxford & the other lotApple Wumble wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:00 am
Interested to see the government’s approach to this and what leaflet or information will be given before getting the vaccine
That's my worry. The sheer volume of people who'll be taking it almost simultaneously means that a)totally unrelated clusters of 'symptoms' will be jumped upon by the press and b) a tiny number of people will have adverse reactions. A significant number of people will then say 'well I'm not taking it' as the explanation of the risks (ie there is a tiny residual one but almost infinitely less than catching the actual disease, which will likely happen if not enough people get the vaccine and you yourself don't get the vaccine) has been so poorly communicated.faldO wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 11:40 am People will get side effects, which should disappear quickly.
Then there will be adverse drug reactions (ADRs) which are monitored by health agencies.
And - given the demographic to which the vaccine is given - 100s of people will die within a short time (days/weeks/months) of getting the vaccine.
The challenge is to weed out what is attributed to the vaccine vs what is not.
I expect the press will have a field day with it and it will be a different thing to scaremonger about.
Not our regulatory pie.Thor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 5:54 am Look who has his fingers in our regulatory pie.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra ... ganisation
This is the wrong argument.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 3:51 pmThat's my worry. The sheer volume of people who'll be taking it almost simultaneously means that a)totally unrelated clusters of 'symptoms' will be jumped upon by the press and b) a tiny number of people will have adverse reactions. A significant number of people will then say 'well I'm not taking it' as the explanation of the risks (ie there is a tiny residual one but almost infinitely less than catching the actual disease, which will likely happen if not enough people get the vaccine and you yourself don't get the vaccine) has been so poorly communicated.faldO wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 11:40 am People will get side effects, which should disappear quickly.
Then there will be adverse drug reactions (ADRs) which are monitored by health agencies.
And - given the demographic to which the vaccine is given - 100s of people will die within a short time (days/weeks/months) of getting the vaccine.
The challenge is to weed out what is attributed to the vaccine vs what is not.
I expect the press will have a field day with it and it will be a different thing to scaremonger about.
https://www.acas.org.uk/coronavirus/sel ... d-sick-payRonnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:03 am Clearly your daughter hasn’t been careful enough. But I wish her well and am sure she’ll be absolutely fine, as nearly everyone of her age who catches it will be.
Why isn’t your granddaughter still being paid by her employer?
There is NO evidence that the vaccine will stop you being infectious.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:05 amThis is the wrong argument.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 3:51 pmThat's my worry. The sheer volume of people who'll be taking it almost simultaneously means that a)totally unrelated clusters of 'symptoms' will be jumped upon by the press and b) a tiny number of people will have adverse reactions. A significant number of people will then say 'well I'm not taking it' as the explanation of the risks (ie there is a tiny residual one but almost infinitely less than catching the actual disease, which will likely happen if not enough people get the vaccine and you yourself don't get the vaccine) has been so poorly communicated.faldO wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 11:40 am People will get side effects, which should disappear quickly.
Then there will be adverse drug reactions (ADRs) which are monitored by health agencies.
And - given the demographic to which the vaccine is given - 100s of people will die within a short time (days/weeks/months) of getting the vaccine.
The challenge is to weed out what is attributed to the vaccine vs what is not.
I expect the press will have a field day with it and it will be a different thing to scaremonger about.
You’re not being vaccinated to stop you getting ill with it, it’s (primarily) to stop you spreading it. Maybe people would be more likely to take it up if that was made clearer?
Still wrong wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:06 amThere is NO evidence that the vaccine will stop you being infectious.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:05 amThis is the wrong argument.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 3:51 pm
That's my worry. The sheer volume of people who'll be taking it almost simultaneously means that a)totally unrelated clusters of 'symptoms' will be jumped upon by the press and b) a tiny number of people will have adverse reactions. A significant number of people will then say 'well I'm not taking it' as the explanation of the risks (ie there is a tiny residual one but almost infinitely less than catching the actual disease, which will likely happen if not enough people get the vaccine and you yourself don't get the vaccine) has been so poorly communicated.
You’re not being vaccinated to stop you getting ill with it, it’s (primarily) to stop you spreading it. Maybe people would be more likely to take it up if that was made clearer?