Page 3 of 4

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
I would say if anybody can ride this storm out it would be Boris . A lot depends on the Susan Grey investigation

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:02 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 pm I would say if anybody can ride this storm out it would be Boris . A lot depends on the Susan Grey investigation
Ride out until the next election at least.

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:06 pm
by tuffers#1
SvenO wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:38 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:39 pm
SvenO wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:24 pm

That is what Corbyn was thinking.
corbyn is far more decent than me . I'd go a bit more Josef Stalin !
Stalin had a party, you just have your hand of preference.
Me & stalin a room .
Im the only one walking out .

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:09 pm
by tuffers#1
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 pm I would say if anybody can ride this storm out it would be Boris . A lot depends on the Susan Grey cover up
Edited for you

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:10 pm
by Long slender neck
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:06 pm
SvenO wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:38 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:39 pm

corbyn is far more decent than me . I'd go a bit more Josef Stalin !
Stalin had a party, you just have your hand of preference.
Me & stalin a room .
Im the only one walking out .
Ooh you're hard.

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:16 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 pm I would say if anybody can ride this storm out it would be Boris . A lot depends on the Susan Grey investigation
A lot depends on Johnson getting rid of the beeb and getting sun/telegraph/mail etc on side.

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:21 pm
by tuffers#1
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:10 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:06 pm
SvenO wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:38 pm

Stalin had a party, you just have your hand of preference.
Me & stalin a room .
Im the only one walking out .
Ooh you're hard.
What makes you say that ?

Stalin was a p155 head .
I drink very little , hence why I Would be able to walk !

Re: Boris

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:42 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:02 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 pm I would say if anybody can ride this storm out it would be Boris . A lot depends on the Susan Grey investigation
Ride out until the next election at least.
Of course. Ultimately the people will decide but the next election is in two years time and a lot can happen between now and then.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:41 am
by Type high
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:18 pm Although the information on parties is new, the fact he is an incompetent fool who isn't fit to lead this country, is very old news. If you voted Tory, you are culpable and gullible.
Voting for Cor Blimey was an even bigger mistake, Starmer even thought there was nothing wrong with Jim will xxxx it. Now who's the culpable and gullible one, try and fix that.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:46 am
by Type high
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:57 am
SvenO wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:35 am Boris is only power because Labour so ineffective, the Conservatives could literally run any candidate and win.
Yeah, hows the effective party you voted for going?

Even if Labour are ineffective, you dont have to vote for this useless lot.
The clueless loney useless lefties, nothing is worse than that lot

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:52 am
by Type high
Give it to Jabo wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:40 pm I think people have had enough of Boris; tactical voting will come into force like never before…
You are so out of touch with the Electorate, you preach to yourselves but don't realize The Great Unwashed aren't with you and haven't been for the last 10 years or so.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:58 am
by Type high
PoundhillO wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 pm For all those that vote for the Tory party that make the rich richer and the poor poorer, shame on you.
I have no shame at all in making money and making silly people like you poorer

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 3:01 am
by Type high
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:43 pm
PoundhillO wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 pm For all those that vote for the Tory party that make the rich richer and the poor poorer, shame on you.
And how are the modern Labour Party any different .? Labour lost me when that Red Tory Sir Tony Blair was leader .
I voted for him 3 times. Best labour Prime Minister since Super Mac.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 3:09 am
by Type high
SvenO wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:36 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:53 pm
greyhound wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 7:12 pm all party's are all the same promise the earth
until they get in power, then they are full off ...t
To save on words and to ease the burden on the internet may I suggest in future you just post

"They're all the same"

After a short time to establish its meaning this can be further shortened to TATS.
TATS.
Thought for a minute that was a typo

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:21 am
by tuffers#1
The Right wingers are very salty at the minute . good to see . :D

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:22 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Type high wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:46 am
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:57 am
SvenO wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:35 am Boris is only power because Labour so ineffective, the Conservatives could literally run any candidate and win.
Yeah, hows the effective party you voted for going?

Even if Labour are ineffective, you dont have to vote for this useless lot.
The clueless loney useless lefties, nothing is worse than that lot
You should open your blinkers every so often. It's not good to be deep routed in a philosophy or point of view and point to 'well it would be worse if...' that that view is failing spectacularly in practice.

Up to you, of course, i wont hold my breath but i'll be here to support you if you need it.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:57 pm
by SvenO
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:06 pm
SvenO wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:38 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:39 pm

corbyn is far more decent than me . I'd go a bit more Josef Stalin !
Stalin had a party, you just have your hand of preference.
Me & stalin a room .
Im the only one walking out .
That wasnt about fighting but it is spelt similar to walking.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:58 pm
by SvenO
Type high wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 3:09 am
SvenO wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:36 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:53 pm

To save on words and to ease the burden on the internet may I suggest in future you just post

"They're all the same"

After a short time to establish its meaning this can be further shortened to TATS.
TATS.
Thought for a minute that was a typo
Sorry Max its too early for it to catch on.

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:27 pm
by tuffers#1
SvenO wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:06 pm
SvenO wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:38 pm

Stalin had a party, you just have your hand of preference.
Me & stalin a room .
Im the only one walking out .
That wasnt about fighting but it is spelt similar to walking.
Talking. often makes mewonder why you try .

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:36 pm
by SvenO
tuffers#1 wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:27 pm
SvenO wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:06 pm

Me & stalin a room .
Im the only one walking out .
That wasnt about fighting but it is spelt similar to walking.
Talking. often makes mewonder why you try .
Nice redirection when no response. You try and correct spelling (which you can not this time), even tho it looks like you got held back at school for english.
Plus i don't know if Stalin was known for his fighting ability, wierd boast?

Re: Boris

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 10:52 pm
by tuffers#1
SvenO wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:36 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:27 pm
SvenO wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:57 pm

That wasnt about fighting but it is spelt similar to walking.
Talking. often makes mewonder why you try .
Nice redirection when no response. You try and correct spelling (which you can not this time), even tho it looks like you got held back at school for english.
Plus i don't know if Stalin was known for his fighting ability, wierd boast?
Held back at school , ME ? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: . what makes you think i was talking about fighting ? If you read the thread & not just my replies , you'd , make it harder for me to make you look like a Numpty ! ;) ;) No redirection here .

Re: Boris

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:31 am
by E10EU
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -the-rules

"Nobody told him that the party was against the rules" This sounds like a 4 year old child speaking - the leader of our country.
It's quite sad and embarrassing.

But an even bigger problem comes next: the next person the Tories chose to take over as PM will be somebody who is just as extreme but skilful at dressing it up better for public consumption.

Re: Boris

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:29 am
by Dunners
You know things are bad when you find yourself cringing and almost feeling sorry for him, while watching THAT Sky News interview yesterday. Almost.

Re: Boris

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:27 am
by tuffers#1


This one ?

Re: Boris

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:10 am
by HARVEY T DENTON
Genius.