Ousseynou Cisse released by Gillingham.

[Stamford O]

but did you play in goal for them?

No.it was for Lancs county council estates 7 a side team .league sponsored by Unison who have all keepers a Swindon shirt.bizarre

[Adz]

why the f*** would a championship side sign a player who can't get into a league one side?

[Dohnut]

why the f*** would a championship side sign a player who can't get into a league one side?

Cover

[Disoriented]

FFS Ling. Anyone who thought we had a snowflake of signing Ouss with Ling as our DOF is seriously deluded.

Davis, Fletcher, Adams, Alabi, Cisse - some recruitment resume.

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

[Top of the JES]

FFS Ling. Anyone who thought we had a snowflake of signing Ouss with Ling as our DOF is seriously deluded.

Davis, Fletcher, Adams, Alabi, Cisse - some recruitment resume.

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

Yawn. You should see someone about your unhealthy fixation about Martin Ling. All very sad.

[Disoriented]

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

Yawn. You should see someone about your unhealthy fixation about Martin Ling. All very sad.

Let me know then who you go to see about your unhealthy fixation on me.

[Top of the JES]

Bizarre comment

You usually follow my posts on various threads making unfunny glib and insulting remarks or slating the DoF, you can't stop yourself.

[Disoriented]

Bizarre comment

You usually follow my posts on various threads making unfunny glib and insulting remarks or slating the DoF, you can't stop yourself.

Relentless and dangerously obsessive.

[Top of the JES]

Bizarre comment

You usually follow my posts on various threads making unfunny glib and insulting remarks or slating the DoF, you can't stop yourself.

Relentless and dangerously obsessive.

You are and I'm glad you agree. Seek help mate.

[Disoriented]

Bizarre comment

You usually follow my posts on various threads making unfunny glib and insulting remarks or slating the DoF, you can't stop yourself.

Relentless and dangerously obsessive.

You are and I'm glad you agree. Seek help mate.

Relentless and dangerously obsessive.

Humourless and an early leaver too. I bet you stand in front of the disabled section too when you get down to pitch level.

[Top of the JES]

Relentless and dangerously obsessive.

You are and I'm glad you agree. Seek help mate.

Relentless and dangerously obsessive.

Humourless and an early leaver too. I bet you stand in front of the disabled section too when you get down to pitch level.

Hasn't anyone ever told you betting is a mugs game,You would have just lost your bet.

[Dohnut]

FFS Ling. Anyone who thought we had a snowflake of signing Ouss with Ling as our DOF is seriously deluded.

Davis, Fletcher, Adams, Alabi, Cisse - some recruitment resume.

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

A broken clock that made us champions. Let’s break a few more. Can’t argue with that.

[Sid Bishop]

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

''A broken clock that made us champions. Let’s break a few more. Can’t argue with that.''

That was a good comeback.

[The Big Shot]

FFS Ling. Anyone who thought we had a snowflake of signing Ouss with Ling as our DOF is seriously deluded.

Davis, Fletcher, Adams, Alabi, Cisse - some recruitment resume.

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

I'm sorry but you can't just say all the decisions which haven't paid off are Lings fault laying all the blame at his door criticising him, before then saying that any of the positive decisions which have paid off - which he deserves some praise for because he'd made those decisions or had a say in them, that he's not allowed to take credit for those - where's the even balance? He's made an equal amount of good judgement decisions and bad ones.

It comes across as double standards by saying even a clock is right twice a day, it also suggests to me that it dents your ego a bit when something goes right that you got wrong (but thats just my opinion and the way I see it) unless you're on a wind up.

[Dohnut]

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

I'm sorry but you can't just say all the decisions which haven't paid off are Lings fault laying all the blame at his door criticising him, before then saying that any of the positive decisions which have paid off - which he deserves some praise for because he'd made those decisions or had a say in them, that he's not allowed to take credit for those - where's the even balance? He's made an equal amount of good judgement decisions and bad ones.

It comes across as double standards by saying even a clock is right twice a day, it also suggests to me that it dents your ego a bit when something goes right that you got wrong (but thats just my opinion and the way I see it) unless you're on a wind up.

Dis keeps this type of stuff going because he wants the attention generated by the responses. Sad really, sitting at home by his computer feeling pleased he continually gets a bite. He don’t believe half the stuff he posts, just an attention seeker.

[Disoriented]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

I'm sorry but you can't just say all the decisions which haven't paid off are Lings fault laying all the blame at his door criticising him, before then saying that any of the positive decisions which have paid off - which he deserves some praise for because he'd made those decisions or had a say in them, that he's not allowed to take credit for those - where's the even balance? He's made an equal amount of good judgement decisions and bad ones.

It comes across as double standards by saying even a clock is right twice a day, it also suggests to me that it dents your ego a bit when something goes right that you got wrong (but thats just my opinion and the way I see it) unless you're on a wind up.

Dis keeps this type of stuff going because he wants the attention generated by the responses. Sad really, sitting at home by his computer feeling pleased he continually gets a bite. He don’t believe half the stuff he posts, just an attention seeker.

Really? Says the number 1 attention seeker who spent the entire time our beloved club was being run into the ground by a corporate monster defending the geezer to the hilt.

You are some hypocritical piece of work.

[Disoriented]

Agree, we should add Bonne and Edinburgh to that list. Though personally I thought they turned out to be excellent.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

I'm sorry but you can't just say all the decisions which haven't paid off are Lings fault laying all the blame at his door criticising him, before then saying that any of the positive decisions which have paid off - which he deserves some praise for because he'd made those decisions or had a say in them, that he's not allowed to take credit for those - where's the even balance? He's made an equal amount of good judgement decisions and bad ones.

It comes across as double standards by saying even a clock is right twice a day, it also suggests to me that it dents your ego a bit when something goes right that you got wrong (but thats just my opinion and the way I see it) unless you're on a wind up.

Where have I said that ALL decisions are Ling’s fault?

Typical misrepresentation from you to inflate your feeble thinking.

[Disoriented]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

''A broken clock that made us champions. Let’s break a few more. Can’t argue with that.''

That was a good comeback.

Really?

Justin got us promoted, not Ling.

[Dohnut]

''A broken clock that made us champions. Let’s break a few more. Can’t argue with that.''

That was a good comeback.

Really?

Justin got us promoted, not Ling.

I’ve come to the conclusion your Ling comments are just you having a bit of fun to get a reaction. Got to be so, nobody can be that stupid.

[The Big Shot]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, fella.

I'm sorry but you can't just say all the decisions which haven't paid off are Lings fault laying all the blame at his door criticising him, before then saying that any of the positive decisions which have paid off - which he deserves some praise for because he'd made those decisions or had a say in them, that he's not allowed to take credit for those - where's the even balance? He's made an equal amount of good judgement decisions and bad ones.

It comes across as double standards by saying even a clock is right twice a day, it also suggests to me that it dents your ego a bit when something goes right that you got wrong (but thats just my opinion and the way I see it) unless you're on a wind up.

Where have I said that ALL decisions are Ling’s fault?

Typical misrepresentation from you to inflate your feeble thinking.

Nowhere.

All I'm saying is, that you come across as having a go at Ling when in your opinion he's made a mistake, but you don't want to credit him if something he does is correct. You can't just turn around and say even a broken clock is wrong twice a day to cover yourself if he's made a correct decision, surely there should be an even balance?

You just come across as double standards to myself and alot of other people here, you might not see it youself, but you've just always come across as that sort of person to me.

[Disoriented]

That was a good comeback.

Really?

Justin got us promoted, not Ling.

I’ve come to the conclusion your Ling comments are just you having a bit of fun to get a reaction. Got to be so, nobody can be that stupid.

Fella, you are the consummate expert in stupidity and in a class of your own.

[Disoriented]

I'm sorry but you can't just say all the decisions which haven't paid off are Lings fault laying all the blame at his door criticising him, before then saying that any of the positive decisions which have paid off - which he deserves some praise for because he'd made those decisions or had a say in them, that he's not allowed to take credit for those - where's the even balance? He's made an equal amount of good judgement decisions and bad ones.

It comes across as double standards by saying even a clock is right twice a day, it also suggests to me that it dents your ego a bit when something goes right that you got wrong (but thats just my opinion and the way I see it) unless you're on a wind up.

Where have I said that ALL decisions are Ling’s fault?

Typical misrepresentation from you to inflate your feeble thinking.

Nowhere.

All I'm saying is, that you come across as having a go at Ling when in your opinion he's made a mistake, but you don't want to credit him if something he does is correct. You can't just turn around and say even a broken clock is wrong twice a day to cover yourself if he's made a correct decision, surely there should be an even balance?

You just come across as double standards to myself and alot of other people here, you might not see it youself, but you've just always come across as that sort of person to me.

The subject of our DOF would probably occupy 1% of my posts. If you think otherwise, you must be obsessed with the subject.

I have credited him many times, but you choose to ignore that and focus on the occasional justified criticism.

As I said, inflating your ‘point’.

Sad.

[The Big Shot]

Where have I said that ALL decisions are Ling’s fault?

Typical misrepresentation from you to inflate your feeble thinking.

Nowhere.

All I'm saying is, that you come across as having a go at Ling when in your opinion he's made a mistake, but you don't want to credit him if something he does is correct. You can't just turn around and say even a broken clock is wrong twice a day to cover yourself if he's made a correct decision, surely there should be an even balance?

You just come across as double standards to myself and alot of other people here, you might not see it youself, but you've just always come across as that sort of person to me.

The subject of our DOF would probably occupy 1% of my posts. If you think otherwise, you must be obsessed with the subject.

I have credited him many times, but you choose to ignore that and focus on the occasional justified criticism.

As I said, inflating your ‘point’.

Sad.

Are you able to give me an example of yourself praising him please?

Also I'm disappointed at your little jibes at me, calling me names like Sad. I look up to important people like you, so its really disheartening to see you resort to name calling during a normal discussion

[Disoriented]

Nowhere.

All I'm saying is, that you come across as having a go at Ling when in your opinion he's made a mistake, but you don't want to credit him if something he does is correct. You can't just turn around and say even a broken clock is wrong twice a day to cover yourself if he's made a correct decision, surely there should be an even balance?

You just come across as double standards to myself and alot of other people here, you might not see it youself, but you've just always come across as that sort of person to me.

The subject of our DOF would probably occupy 1% of my posts. If you think otherwise, you must be obsessed with the subject.

I have credited him many times, but you choose to ignore that and focus on the occasional justified criticism.

As I said, inflating your ‘point’.

Sad.

Are you able to give me an example of yourself praising him please?

Also I'm disappointed at your little jibes at me, calling me names like Sad. I look up to important people like you, so its really disheartening to see you resort to name calling during a normal discussion

1. I have better things to do than trawl through thousands of posts.

2. I think you will find it is you, fella, making jibes at me.

3. I didn’t call you ‘sad’, I said it was sad how you endeavour to make your comments more substantial than what they are.

4. Get real. Your ‘humorous’ opening post started this discussion.

Happy to clarify all of this for you.

Any time.

[The Big Shot]

The subject of our DOF would probably occupy 1% of my posts. If you think otherwise, you must be obsessed with the subject.

I have credited him many times, but you choose to ignore that and focus on the occasional justified criticism.

As I said, inflating your ‘point’.

Sad.

Are you able to give me an example of yourself praising him please?

Also I'm disappointed at your little jibes at me, calling me names like Sad. I look up to important people like you, so its really disheartening to see you resort to name calling during a normal discussion

1. I have better things to do than trawl through thousands of posts.

2. I think you will find it is you, fella, making jibes at me.

3. I didn’t call you ‘sad’, I said it was sad how you endeavour to make your comments more substantial than what they are.

4. Get real. Your ‘humorous’ opening post started this discussion.

Happy to clarify all of this for you.

Any time.

Would you mind finding some example post of you praising Ling please?

I really want closure on the discussion, I don't want to lose faith in you my friend, everyone knows you've never been wrong about anything on here, so please help me save faith in you and help me defend you from the low level people who claim when you're wrong about something when you never have been.