When the move to the Olympic Stadium was first mooted by Gold and Sullivan the vast majority of Hammers fans remained silent. (They only vented some anger towards Barry Hearn) They were more than happy with the move. They're only complaining now that they've lost their unique identity.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:54 am
by Thor
Jack wheelchair has gone in for a groin operation. How did he injury that when hes already injured!!
Apparently he is on £100k per week and has in his time with the hammers started only 6 games. Why would you pay that for someone will such a terrible injury record. Madness.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:59 am
by Long slender neck
Article_50 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:17 am
When the move to the Olympic Stadium was first mooted by Gold and Sullivan the vast majority of Hammers fans remained silent. (They only vented some anger towards Barry Hearn) They were more than happy with the move. They're only complaining now that they've lost their unique identity.
I feel like the fans were taken in with a false competition for the stadium. Spurs didnt really want it, they were playing a card to get what they really wanted elsewhere. WH fans then just wanted it to get one over on Spurs.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:10 am
by Ornchurch
Article_50 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:17 am
When the move to the Olympic Stadium was first mooted by Gold and Sullivan the vast majority of Hammers fans remained silent. (They only vented some anger towards Barry Hearn) They were more than happy with the move. They're only complaining now that they've lost their unique identity.
They are complaining as all of the lies told by Gold, Sullivan and Brady are coming home to roost.
Same as Hearns's lie that Wet Ham moving would kill Orient and its future support. That hasn't come true either.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:11 am
by spen666
Thor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:54 am
Jack wheelchair has gone in for a groin operation. How did he injury that when hes already injured!!
Apparently he is on £100k per week and has in his time with the hammers started only 6 games. Why would you pay that for someone will such a terrible injury record. Madness.
Well they had to sign a suitable replacement for Andy Carroll. They needed someone to make the physio bench their own
No, it's not. Can I make a suggestion? Maybe instead of coming on here and trying to start arguments by posting drivel that you know to be untrue and indefensible you spend your time more productively and try doing something that will inject some positivity into an already too miserable world? Just a thought.
So both clubs appoint as new manager / head coach someone who previously held role and was replaced
Both clubs accept they made mistakes
But its not the same outcome?
The outcome is both clubs have same person now in charge as they had previously replaced.
So, which part of that is untrue?
How about answering stating why what I said is in your opinion untrue instead of resorting to personal attacks and criticisms.
You know full well the situations were different. And please learn to read I was not attacking you with my earlier post it was simply a suggestion that I feel would lead you towards a happier and more fulfilled life. You are, of course, free to ignore my suggestion and continue with your antagonistic and misleading posts if you think that wise.
No, it's not. Can I make a suggestion? Maybe instead of coming on here and trying to start arguments by posting drivel that you know to be untrue and indefensible you spend your time more productively and try doing something that will inject some positivity into an already too miserable world? Just a thought.
So both clubs appoint as new manager / head coach someone who previously held role and was replaced
Both clubs accept they made mistakes
But its not the same outcome?
The outcome is both clubs have same person now in charge as they had previously replaced.
So, which part of that is untrue?
How about answering stating why what I said is in your opinion untrue instead of resorting to personal attacks and criticisms.
You know full well the situations were different. And please learn to read I was not attacking you with my earlier post it was simply a suggestion that I feel would lead you towards a happier and more fulfilled life. You are, of course, free to ignore my suggestion and continue with your antagonistic and misleading posts if you think that wise.
So, tell me what is different in the outcome?
both clubs replaced their head coach/ manager with someone else
Both clubs later reappointed original person and
both clubs admit they made mistakes
Seems very much to me like its the same outcome.
I guess you must agree as you repeatedly refuse to tell me what the difference in the outcome is?
Replace person
reappoint original person
admit made mistakes
Seems like same outcome in both situations
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:13 pm
by tuffers#1
Article_50 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:17 am
When the move to the Olympic Stadium was first mooted by Gold and Sullivan the vast majority of Hammers fans remained silent. (They only vented some anger towards Barry Hearn) They were more than happy with the move. They're only complaining now that they've lost their unique identity.
When the Olympic stadium was 1st mooted
Gold & Sullivan said No .
A 25,000 seater capacity does not interest us
mr livingstone.
Mr Hearn is very interested mr livingstone.
So both clubs appoint as new manager / head coach someone who previously held role and was replaced
Both clubs accept they made mistakes
But its not the same outcome?
The outcome is both clubs have same person now in charge as they had previously replaced.
So, which part of that is untrue?
How about answering stating why what I said is in your opinion untrue instead of resorting to personal attacks and criticisms.
You know full well the situations were different. And please learn to read I was not attacking you with my earlier post it was simply a suggestion that I feel would lead you towards a happier and more fulfilled life. You are, of course, free to ignore my suggestion and continue with your antagonistic and misleading posts if you think that wise.
So, tell me what is different in the outcome?
both clubs replaced their head coach/ manager with someone else
Both clubs later reappointed original person and
both clubs admit they made mistakes
Seems very much to me like its the same outcome.
I guess you must agree as you repeatedly refuse to tell me what the difference in the outcome is?
Replace person
reappoint original person
admit made mistakes
Seems like same outcome in both situations
You know I don't agree and you know the situations were totally different. Get help.
You know full well the situations were different. And please learn to read I was not attacking you with my earlier post it was simply a suggestion that I feel would lead you towards a happier and more fulfilled life. You are, of course, free to ignore my suggestion and continue with your antagonistic and misleading posts if you think that wise.
So, tell me what is different in the outcome?
both clubs replaced their head coach/ manager with someone else
Both clubs later reappointed original person and
both clubs admit they made mistakes
Seems very much to me like its the same outcome.
I guess you must agree as you repeatedly refuse to tell me what the difference in the outcome is?
Replace person
reappoint original person
admit made mistakes
Seems like same outcome in both situations
You know I don't agree and you know the situations were totally different. Get help.
You still fail to answer the question.
Both clubs replaced Head Coach or manager
Both clubs re appointed original person
Both clubs admitted making mistakes
So, please tell me what the difference in outcome is?
You keep saying different situation, by that is irrelevant because I am saying it's the same outcome. I have never said it's the same situation at all.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 8:46 pm
by KC & sunshine band
Is there anyway we can help poor west ham
Perhaps we could loan some of their injured players
no - its a silly idea
Is it ?
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 6:25 pm
by tuffers#1
Spammers in the bottom 3
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 6:28 pm
by Howling Mad Murdock
Agent Moyes at work again.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 6:28 pm
by EliotNes
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 6:25 pm
Spammers in the bottom 3
Article_50 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:17 am
When the move to the Olympic Stadium was first mooted by Gold and Sullivan the vast majority of Hammers fans remained silent. (They only vented some anger towards Barry Hearn) They were more than happy with the move. They're only complaining now that they've lost their unique identity.
I feel like the fans were taken in with a false competition for the stadium. Spurs didnt really want it, they were playing a card to get what they really wanted elsewhere. WH fans then just wanted it to get one over on Spurs.
West Ham got well and truly mugged off by Boris Johnson. The rest of the country should take note, before it's too late... oops
Article_50 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:17 am
When the move to the Olympic Stadium was first mooted by Gold and Sullivan the vast majority of Hammers fans remained silent. (They only vented some anger towards Barry Hearn) They were more than happy with the move. They're only complaining now that they've lost their unique identity.
I feel like the fans were taken in with a false competition for the stadium. Spurs didnt really want it, they were playing a card to get what they really wanted elsewhere. WH fans then just wanted it to get one over on Spurs.
West Ham got well and truly mugged off by Boris Johnson. The rest of the country should take note, before it's too late... oops
I don’t think they did get mugged off. After the time lock expires a premier league club with a ground like that will be worth a fortune and the porn Barrons are long term players. They sold the old ground ching Chin and when they sell up as surely they will then the tills will be ringing like never before.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2020 12:30 pm
by OyinbO
The term "Premier League Club" is carrying a lot of weight in that argument.
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:29 pm
by tuffers#1
A lot of legal threats being bandied about by the 3 stooges so it seems
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:51 pm
by KC & sunshine band
watch the videos
and listen to roy orbison singing crying
omg i have to go to the hospital tomorrow ive broken 3 ribs laffing
By the way were they upset !!!!!!!!
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 10:05 am
by Cheshunto
Apparently Police are searching for three West Ham fans who were making homophobic gestures towards the Brighton fans at Saturday’s match.
A West Ham spokesman said that “West Ham will ban any guilty fan for life from watching the team play and ask those guilty to come forward “
So far 4,850 fans have come forward saying “it was me”
Re: West Ham - losses of over £27m
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2020 12:29 pm
by Thor
Seems like you are not allowed to carry a flag or wear a shirt which calls for the owners to get out. The man has had his season ticket cancelled and he’s banned from the ground. Madness.