Page 3 of 3

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:03 pm
by Long slender neck
Just read the thread in question back, Sid Bishop was the real villain.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:05 pm
by Lucky7
So why Sid Bishop not banned or had name change if he was the instigator?

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:16 pm
by Long slender neck
What shall I change his name to?

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:20 pm
by Max B Gold
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:10 pm He'll be back because the truth is we all miss him.
When I said all I of course meant none of us.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:20 pm
by Disoriented
Admin wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:00 pm
Disoriented wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:44 pm
Admin wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:10 pm

Not sure quite why everyone’s getting themselves so worked up on this one. HMM - We’ve never had a cross word and I think my record speaks for itself over 5 years of modding / admin - very rarely have I stuck my head over the parapet.

However, Maffys spent a long time honing what had become a fairly unpleasant contrarian position purely for wumming purposes. Make no mistake, he knew exactly what he was doing. My discussion with him on the labour thread a few months ago summed him up perfectly.

His flounce in reaction to having his username changed demonstrates exactly what he is. All I’ve done is changed his username to reflect his posting at that time - if he really is this boardroom tough guy he portrayed himself as surely he could shrug that off or argue his point? Instead, he’s shuffled off to Mungos and bitches from afar. Ask yourself - why is this?
We can’t have unpleasant contrarian position takers here unless they are appointed as ‘moderators’.

Heh - the difference being Maffy will continue to deny that accusation despite the evidence of his own actions.

Likewise, I’m Not sure what part of “he’s not been banned” you don’t understand? His reaction to a change in username to reflect his posts speaks volumes about him.

Feel free to keep generating synthetic anger over this though.
Not quite sure why you two are getting all hysterical about being called out for a misjudgement.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:29 pm
by Long slender neck
I'm not going to change it back and i don't care, this is just fun for me.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:44 pm
by Thor
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:10 pm He'll be back because the truth is we all miss him.
He won't return and he seems to like it over there.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 7:19 pm
by Max B Gold
Thor wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:44 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:10 pm He'll be back because the truth is we all miss him.
He won't return and he seems to like it over there.
How do you know he's not still on here?

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 7:25 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:16 pm What shall I change his name to?
Something about everything being better 30 years ago, or something about being Mr cut and paste.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:12 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Grown adults bleating about another grown up having his ‘handle’ changed. Seriously, give your heads a wobble.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:17 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Not the point at all.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:28 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
What is the point then? Come on, this is playground stuff.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:17 pm
by Fanny
Disoriented wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:20 pm
Admin wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:00 pm
Disoriented wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:44 pm

We can’t have unpleasant contrarian position takers here unless they are appointed as ‘moderators’.

Heh - the difference being Maffy will continue to deny that accusation despite the evidence of his own actions.

Likewise, I’m Not sure what part of “he’s not been banned” you don’t understand? His reaction to a change in username to reflect his posts speaks volumes about him.

Feel free to keep generating synthetic anger over this though.
Not quite sure why you two are getting all hysterical about being called out for a misjudgement.
For somebody who apparently hates this board because it’s “toxic” you don’t half spend a lot of time whinging on here.

If you don’t like it why don’t you go and set up your own message board and moderate it like the paragon of measure and fairness you apparently are?

Nobody forces you to post on here.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:45 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Lucky7 wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:05 pm So why Sid Bishop not banned or had name change if he was the instigator?
No idea how a thumbs up was attributed to me in the post above...? I didn't even know what it was about. Anyway I'm about to delete it, if I can.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:58 pm
by Lucky7
Chief crazy horse wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:45 pm
Lucky7 wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:05 pm So why Sid Bishop not banned or had name change if he was the instigator?
No idea how a thumbs up was attributed to me in the post above...? I didn't even know what it was about. Anyway I'm about to delete it, if I can.
your thumbs up was as equally appreciated as your thumbs down CCH :lol:

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 3:27 pm
by JimbO
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 4:17 pm What is life like for you two in Dohys rectum?
Can't be quite as comfy as you and FTC spooning each other it must be something like that as it's the only reason for you being a mod.

Re: Dohnut.

Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:49 pm
by Long slender neck
He's a great cuddler. Don't be jel.