Page 3 of 6
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:18 pm
by Hoover Attack
BoniO wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:13 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:22 pm
The Centerists Dads can’t just accept that their man might be a bit unpopular
I don't like Starmer, but still voted Labour to try and get rid of the scummy Tories. Labour have made way too many mistakes so far but the weight of criticism from the Media outlets and Social media channels is frankly ridiculous and completely disproportionate to his and Labours performance. It's an orchestrated attack on a democratically elected head of state.
Finally, would those members of the public currently villifying Starmer really want the Tories back?
Of course the criticism is ridiculous and disproportionate. What did anyone expect?
The people signing this will be the ex-Tory voters who voted for Reform this time.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:20 pm
by Max B Gold
Fantastic comment and it seems to me you are a real defender of free speech. Added to that you come across as someone who takes things seriously and sensitively. You've got a good eye for detail and a very enjoyable writing style which it is a joy to read. Your comments are very important to this forum. Keep it up!!
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:51 pm
by Hoover Attack
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:00 pm
by Long slender neck
Blimey we've only just finished a civil war and now this
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:07 pm
by Pugwash
Is elton giving a million away again?
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:09 pm
by Pugwash
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:58 pm
Michael Caine has endorsed an election – and Labour should be worried
Lots of room in Jails if they want to Riot again.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:20 pm
by Bandy Legs
StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:15 pm
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:12 pm
Just looking at the signatories data, they're spread very evenly. Vast majority of constituencies have a four figure number of signatories, only a few have 3 figures. Seems a bit unusual to me. Almost as if bots are ensuring they spread their vote around.
Even 650 people in the outer hebrides constituency of 'Na h-Eileanan an Iar' put their name down.
I wonder if such data exists for the previously mentioned remoaner petitions. Would be interesting to see if that follows similar spreads, or more closely follows the geographic split in the Referendum
2nd referendum 4,150,000
https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/13121
Revoke article 50 6,203,056
https://petition.parliament.uk/archived ... ons/241584
Certainly none from Peru, Ethiopia,Eritrea,Serbia etc as this new thing seems to have
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:47 am
by Hoover Attack
Labour to lose majority and have to form coalition with Reform if this new General Election happens:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/u ... 4e6d&ei=19
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:24 am
by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Reckon Labour will definitely go for it
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:29 am
by Yanzi Gravy
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:12 pm
Yanzi Gravy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:54 pm
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:27 pm
Just what are people so pissed off about? Literally nothing has happened compared to the previous bunch
Must be signed by far right bots/russians
DId you miss the budget? Numerous industries saying it will stifle investment, lead to job losses and lead to rate rises.
Did you ,it’s the Farmers protesting last week?
All because both will have to pay their way and they're not used to it. Of course they're complaining
Farmers pay their way especially in hard work. They are the backbone of the country.
The CBI reported negatively on her Budget too.
Last week Starmer single-handedly upset the Russians, the Chinese snd the Israelis within a few days of each other.
It is no good harping on about what the other lot did or did not do but to deliver the ‘change’ promised.
They are now attacking those on sickness benefits having already done the pensioners. There is this petition going round which he is dismissing but could indicate a level of potential unrest should this negativity from his party continue. Reeves receipt about her CV is really concerning too.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:33 am
by Yanzi Gravy
As above
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:48 am
by Currywurst and Chips
The original Article 50 petition and boarders comments on it for reference
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/leytono ... s2080.html
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:12 am
by Hoover Attack
Oof - poor red dwarf.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am
by Pugwash
still under 3 million, why the slow down?
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:18 am
by Admin
Pugwash wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am
still under 3 million, why the slow down?
Dohnut's run out of email addresses?
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:08 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Pugwash wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am
still under 3 million, why the slow down?
Maybe because people are only signing it once and not cheating by signing it multiple times.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:09 am
by Pugwash
Admin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:18 am
Pugwash wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am
still under 3 million, why the slow down?
Dohnut's run out of email addresses?
Imagine not being able to beat the woke snowflake remoaners petitions. The people have spoken.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:12 am
by Pugwash
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:08 am
Pugwash wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am
still under 3 million, why the slow down?
Maybe because people are only signing it once and not cheating by signing it multiple times.
Is that what Trump said?
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:15 am
by Hoover Attack
Yanzi Gravy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:29 am
Farmers pay their way especially in hard work. They are the backbone of the country.
I'd rather they just paid their way in taxes like the rest of us, thanks.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:51 pm
by Celtient
In the days when farmers ploughed the fields with a donkey's jaw bone pulled by 2 shire horses, it was indeed hard work. Nowadays they sit in a half million pound tractor with a consul like the SS Enterprise and sip lattes while the machinery does the work
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:02 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Celtient wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:51 pm
In the days when farmers ploughed the fields with a donkey's jaw bone pulled by 2 shire horses, it was indeed hard work. Nowadays they sit in a half million pound tractor with a consul like the SS Enterprise and sip lattes while the machinery does the work
But this is part of their point. How much do these new tractors cost to buy .
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:05 pm
by Max B Gold
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:02 pm
Celtient wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:51 pm
In the days when farmers ploughed the fields with a donkey's jaw bone pulled by 2 shire horses, it was indeed hard work. Nowadays they sit in a half million pound tractor with a consul like the SS Enterprise and sip lattes while the machinery does the work
But this is part of their point. How much do these new tractors cost to buy .
If you can't afford one don't do farming.
Reality is that on many tenanted farms and small and medium sized farms, they rent the expensive machinery for short periods during ploughing, harvest etc.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:54 pm
by Hoover Attack
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:02 pm
Celtient wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:51 pm
In the days when farmers ploughed the fields with a donkey's jaw bone pulled by 2 shire horses, it was indeed hard work. Nowadays they sit in a half million pound tractor with a consul like the SS Enterprise and sip lattes while the machinery does the work
But this is part of their point. How much do these new tractors cost to buy .
What is part of their point? Machinery is expensive so they shouldn't have to pay tax? Eh? What?
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:55 pm
by Hoover Attack
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:05 pm
Reality is that on many tenanted farms and small and medium sized farms, they rent the expensive machinery for short periods during ploughing, harvest etc.
From the local big farmer. Who hasn't paid any IHT.
Re: FAO Tories and UKIPers
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 2:13 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:20 pm
Fantastic comment and it seems to me you are a real defender of free speech. Added to that you come across as someone who takes things seriously and sensitively. You've got a good eye for detail and a very enjoyable writing style which it is a joy to read. Your comments are very important to this forum. Keep it up!!
'Yes, he's a jolly good fellow.....and so say all of us....'