Re: Oasis reunion
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:20 am
Yeah I do wonder if this actually happens data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3988b/3988b84dedadeb791dbe667c35e342a0ab0e7bb7" alt="😂"
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Such an original take
Yeah, among the young this is basically an equivalent to a Beatles tour being announced in 95.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:26 am I think there will be a surprising number of under 30s
Ffs I like both and I’ve now parted with £40!CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:30 am btw, if you like collecting vinyl for yourself, or fancy doubling your money in a year, get on this. The lenticular cover is nice
https://blood-records.co.uk/products/dm
Only £3 more than the Royal Blood 10th anniversary reissue.CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:30 am btw, if you like collecting vinyl for yourself, or fancy doubling your money in a year, get on this. The lenticular cover is nice
https://blood-records.co.uk/products/dm
TikTok likes easy moneyCurrywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:26 am I think there will be a surprising number of under 30s
Blur's last album was up there with their best imo. But a lot of their 90s stuff has aged like milk and Albarn's voice live is awful, as great as their occasional reunions have been.Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:49 am From that era, two bands that have reunited and since put out better material than in their 90s heyday are Suede and Ride. Both have a far better body of work that Oasis and are still releasing decent new albums today. They are both also awesome live - especially Suede who have totally transformed since their foppish 92-era.
Obviously, I still wish I had been young enough to see them both live in the 90s.
Why won’t Mi5 release the Oasis files?Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:50 amhttps://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/ ... dApp_Other
Some Right Wing fool will try & gain Mileage from thisMistadobalina wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:50 amhttps://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/ ... dApp_Other
Blur’s less good stuff was crap on release day, let alone decades on.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:53 amBlur's last album was up there with their best imo. But a lot of their 90s stuff has aged like milk and Albarn's voice live is awful, as great as their occasional reunions have been.Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:49 am From that era, two bands that have reunited and since put out better material than in their 90s heyday are Suede and Ride. Both have a far better body of work that Oasis and are still releasing decent new albums today. They are both also awesome live - especially Suede who have totally transformed since their foppish 92-era.
Obviously, I still wish I had been young enough to see them both live in the 90s.
Radiohead with Creep and James with Sit Down?CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 10:34 amBlur’s less good stuff was crap on release day, let alone decades on.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:53 amBlur's last album was up there with their best imo. But a lot of their 90s stuff has aged like milk and Albarn's voice live is awful, as great as their occasional reunions have been.Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:49 am From that era, two bands that have reunited and since put out better material than in their 90s heyday are Suede and Ride. Both have a far better body of work that Oasis and are still releasing decent new albums today. They are both also awesome live - especially Suede who have totally transformed since their foppish 92-era.
Obviously, I still wish I had been young enough to see them both live in the 90s.
I don’t know if there’s another band with the same gulf between their most popular crap, and the much more interesting stuff on albums and less big singles.
Parklife, Country House, Stereotypes and Charmless Man all awful, but at the same era, there was stuff like Badhead, This is a Low, End Of A Century, Best Days, Fade Away, He Thought Of Cars, Tracy Jacks that all still stand up today
Creep and Sit Down aren’t crap, just not representative. Blur seemed to cynically dumb down for the biggest hits.Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 10:41 amRadiohead with Creep and James with Sit Down?CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 10:34 amBlur’s less good stuff was crap on release day, let alone decades on.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:53 am
Blur's last album was up there with their best imo. But a lot of their 90s stuff has aged like milk and Albarn's voice live is awful, as great as their occasional reunions have been.
I don’t know if there’s another band with the same gulf between their most popular crap, and the much more interesting stuff on albums and less big singles.
Parklife, Country House, Stereotypes and Charmless Man all awful, but at the same era, there was stuff like Badhead, This is a Low, End Of A Century, Best Days, Fade Away, He Thought Of Cars, Tracy Jacks that all still stand up today
As a bit of a neutral who can appreciate some of Blur's stuff, but also as a total music snob, I personally don't get the derision that Parklife and Girls & Boys often receive. Both are well crafted pop singles that achieved crossover commercial success. I agree that Country House and Charmless Man are awful though.