Col Utd

[The Reverend]

Endlessly posting on the same particular topics and borderline harassing certain people such as spen and CEB despite telling all and sundry I'm ignoring them = perfectly fine, totally normal.

Being pulled up on this = creepy and obsessive.

Gotcha.

CEB and I were having a dispute which we seem to have both, sensibly, given up on. Claiming that I was “harassing” him is bad faith nonsense and you know it.

As for Spen, he constantly trashes threads with his pedantic nonsense which inevitably leads to somebody quoting him which I usually see when reading the thread. I haven’t responded directly to him since I had him on foe. Again, this isn’t “harassing”.

Ironically what is harassing is the fact that you constantly search out my posts and without fail have a dig at me. Very rarely have I ever addressed you directly in the first place.

Out of interest, which part of my post claiming that winning the EFL trophy isn’t a non-league achievement is incorrect? You are so obsessed with me that you’re having digs against basic statements of fact.

[Proposition Joe]

Who said anything about that statement being incorrect? Made no reference to that whatsoever, you're just making stuff up now. Strange.

[The Reverend]

Who said anything about that statement being incorrect? Made no reference to that whatsoever, you're just making stuff up now. Strange.

So just to clarify, you’re upset at a post of mine which you happen to think is factually correct. You’re right, that is strange.

As I said. Your obsession with me is making you talk complete gobbledegook.

[Proposition Joe]

You know people can read how this exchange actually went, right? Like, it's there in black and white (unless you go editing your posts again, ****).

[CEB]

No Rev: I was having a dispute with LSN, into which you inserted yourself despite adding nothing to it, and seemingly having no intent other than escalating the negative outcome for the person you put yourself in opposition to.
You also sabotaged my thread where I attempted to do something arty that a few people had expressed interest in, and I thought “sod this, I can’t be doing with you”
When I foe’d you and you replied saying that you believed that that was sensible, and then wished me a happy new year, you continued to discuss me and cast aspersions on to my character and my motivations, until I saw enough quotes replying to you that I was stupid enough to bite, which was clearly what you wanted.

That’s on me, but out of interest I did a search after he called me “obsessive” and found that you’d mentioned “ceb” 88 times, with about thirty of those times coming after I said I’d foe’d you, to my 12 mentions of “Rev”.
I reckon something similar would happen if you searched Spen’s and Rev’s names, too. I was going to mention it at the time, but I bored even myself and had belatedly realised that, as PJ has noted here, your schtick is to wildly go around harassing people and then get into an endless loop of prior instances that you’d like to think justify your own behaviour.

The problem is that you tie yourself in knots (hence Conkles and I observing that you’re not clever enough for this schtick) and abandon any high ground by, for example, never actually saying “ok I was wrong about the alias, and i seemed to use the assumption that you had an alias as the basis for resuming hostilities so maybe I should back the f*** off”

For the record, we didn’t “both” give up on it - in fact, you replied to five threads at around midnight on New Year’s Day a few hours after I was on the board, and I decided when I saw them the next morning that you are a tedious bell end who wasn’t really doing anything other than fishing for engagement, so I just ignored you.

Until you did your (ironic) “should you do resurrection?” thread, which seemed to serve the same reputation cleansing purpose as when Jack Monroe posts up a thing to make with 17p and some pocket lint after being caught grifting thousands of pounds - where I responded on topic and in the spirit of your thread (unlike you on my arty thread)

I’dve let it go for good if you’d just shut the f*** up, but since you’re moving onto the same same schtick with someone else, while citing the bullshit you pulled with me as if it was all in good fun? No, you can go f*** yourself, you **** (fool)

[CEB]

And, for the record - and I’m not even claiming I should be immune from having this happen as I absolutely bring on conflict myself - I do consider that, after I’d had a dispute with LSN where to anyone with a brain, my ADHD/hyper fixation that I’ve mentioned on here was obviously a factor in me continuing to make a point beyond where most people would bother, your bad faith attempts to goad either me into further escalation or Caca into banning me, your sneery plausible deniability of insinuating personal issues, and your immediate theorising about an alias once I’d f*cked you off with the foe button, did feel a bit like harassing me. The sort of harassing like having a blue bottle in the room that still buzzes about after being swatted, as opposed to fearing for one’s life about a murderer, but yep.

And by all means, continue doing to to me, and knowing myself you’ll probably get the occasional bite. But when I see you doing it to someone else and then expecting me to be like “yeah lol me and Rev was having great bantz”. No. You’re a bit pathetic actually mate

[The Reverend]

No Rev: I was having a dispute with LSN, into which you inserted yourself despite adding nothing to it, and seemingly having no intent other than escalating the negative outcome for the person you put yourself in opposition to.
You also sabotaged my thread where I attempted to do something arty that a few people had expressed interest in, and I thought “sod this, I can’t be doing with you”
When I foe’d you and you replied saying that you believed that that was sensible, and then wished me a happy new year, you continued to discuss me and cast aspersions on to my character and my motivations, until I saw enough quotes replying to you that I was stupid enough to bite, which was clearly what you wanted.

That’s on me, but out of interest I did a search after he called me “obsessive” and found that you’d mentioned “ceb” 88 times, with about thirty of those times coming after I said I’d foe’d you, to my 12 mentions of “Rev”.
I reckon something similar would happen if you searched Spen’s and Rev’s names, too. I was going to mention it at the time, but I bored even myself and had belatedly realised that, as PJ has noted here, your schtick is to wildly go around harassing people and then get into an endless loop of prior instances that you’d like to think justify your own behaviour.

The problem is that you tie yourself in knots (hence Conkles and I observing that you’re not clever enough for this schtick) and abandon any high ground by, for example, never actually saying “ok I was wrong about the alias, and i seemed to use the assumption that you had an alias as the basis for resuming hostilities so maybe I should back the f*** off”

For the record, we didn’t “both” give up on it - in fact, you replied to five threads at around midnight on New Year’s Day a few hours after I was on the board, and I decided when I saw them the next morning that you are a tedious bell end who wasn’t really doing anything other than fishing for engagement, so I just ignored you.

Until you did your (ironic) “should you do resurrection?” thread, which seemed to serve the same reputation cleansing purpose as when Jack Monroe posts up a thing to make with 17p and some pocket lint after being caught grifting thousands of pounds - where I responded on topic and in the spirit of your thread (unlike you on my arty thread)

I’dve let it go for good if you’d just shut the f*** up, but since you’re moving onto the same same schtick with someone else, while citing the bullshit you pulled with me as if it was all in good fun? No, you can go f*** yourself, you **** (fool)

That’s an incredibly long post for a feud that you were apparently bored with. Let me guess, it contains:

1. “I was right”

2. “You got involved in an argument I was having with a moderator” - without mentioning the fact that you set up a thread on a public forum to bring maximum attention to your hissy fit

3. Some sort of accusation about hypocrisy

4. Making some sort of demand about how I behave/what I do next, in line with your usual attempts and controlling behaviour. Do I have to post an apology to you or reword something in a specific way that you dictate?

5. “You’re not very clever” or some equally arrogant statement indicating how you are intellectually superior

How many did I get right?

[The Reverend]

And, for the record - and I’m not even claiming I should be immune from having this happen as I absolutely bring on conflict myself - I do consider that, after I’d had a dispute with LSN where to anyone with a brain, my ADHD/hyper fixation that I’ve mentioned on here was obviously a factor in me continuing to make a point beyond where most people would bother, your bad faith attempts to goad either me into further escalation or Caca into banning me, your sneery plausible deniability of insinuating personal issues, and your immediate theorising about an alias once I’d f*cked you off with the foe button, did feel a bit like harassing me. The sort of harassing like having a blue bottle in the room that still buzzes about after being swatted, as opposed to fearing for one’s life about a murderer, but yep.

And by all means, continue doing to to me, and knowing myself you’ll probably get the occasional bite. But when I see you doing it to someone else and then expecting me to be like “yeah lol me and Rev was having great bantz”. No. You’re a bit pathetic actually mate

Guy who had full on meltdown and posted an arrogant ultimatum which he demanded the admin of the board address immediately over a post that upset you is calling somebody else “pathetic”.

This is precisely why your accusations of hypocrisy don’t land. It’s also why your “I’m so intellectually superior” schtick is amusing as well. Absolutely zero self awareness and a humongous ego.

[CEB]

At least you have the self awareness to have a vague idea of what you’re likely to be accused of. That’s a level of self awareness you’ve previously seemed incapable of reaching.

The problem you’ve got here, my friend, is that everybody can see that you’ve moved right on to Spen without missing a beat as soon as I stopped biting, and considering your complete inability to even concede “I was wrong about your alias” (and your pretence to not even see the posts calling you on it), the idea that YOU get to call out someone for believing they’re right is genuinely staggering.

Now f*** off, you **** (fool)

[The Reverend]

At least you have the self awareness to have a vague idea of what you’re likely to be accused of. That’s a level of self awareness you’ve previously seemed incapable of reaching.

The problem you’ve got here, my friend, is that everybody can see that you’ve moved right on to Spen without missing a beat as soon as I stopped biting, and considering your complete inability to even concede “I was wrong about your alias” (and your pretence to not even see the posts calling you on it), the idea that YOU get to call out someone for believing they’re right is genuinely staggering.

Now f*** off, you **** (fool)

I’m still not entirely convinced that you don’t have an alias, so whilst you’re talking about it like it’s fact this hasn’t been proven either way.

I see that having decided that you can break the rules and call people a C when it suits you, you’ve now decided that you are special and have the power to tell people to F off when it suits you as well. Also against the rules, but I suppose you’re so clever that they don’t apply to you.

[CEB]

I don’t care whether you’re convinced; in fact I think it’s hilarious and telling that you’re happy to openly take up that position rather than concede you were wrong.

Feel free to start another thread moaning about my rule break, but here’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to post this comment, then immediately foe you, and then not mention or reply to you again, unless it comes to my attention that you are making significant efforts to grab my attention, disregarding this.
Up to you what you do with that info - and I’ll even give you a free reply so you can have the last word. But for me - I’ve told you you’re a **** (fool) once I saw you do what you did on my posts to Spen’s, and now I’m done. We can totally stay away from each other and - as you seemed to want - you can also save yourself from ever experiencing my posts again.

Up to you, but just know that any time you mention Spen or me again, everyone will know that it’s because you actually can’t stand being ignored by the people you’ve stoked conflict with.

Now f*** off, you **** (fool)

[The Reverend]

I don’t care whether you’re convinced; in fact I think it’s hilarious and telling that you’re happy to openly take up that position rather than concede you were wrong.

Feel free to start another thread moaning about my rule break, but here’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to post this comment, then immediately foe you, and then not mention or reply to you again, unless it comes to my attention that you are making significant efforts to grab my attention, disregarding this.
Up to you what you do with that info - and I’ll even give you a free reply so you can have the last word. But for me - I’ve told you you’re a **** (fool) once I saw you do what you did on my posts to Spen’s, and now I’m done. We can totally stay away from each other and - as you seemed to want - you can also save yourself from ever experiencing my posts again.

Up to you, but just know that any time you mention Spen or me again, everyone will know that it’s because you actually can’t stand being ignored by the people you’ve stoked conflict with.

Now f*** off, you **** (fool)

Didn’t you do this whole “look how grown up and superior I am because I’m going to let you have the last word” act less than a week ago already?

I’m curious to see if you genuinely are allowed to break the board rules whenever you have a little strop. If so, I’d be keen to know why it’s only you who has this privilege.

[Long slender neck]

You can both have the day off.