Page 3 of 4

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:53 pm
by Buckingham
Do people seriously believe that club owners/managers not only read this message board but take anything said even slightly seriously?

Stunning levels of delusion.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:56 pm
by Disoriented
Buckingham wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:53 pm Do people seriously believe that club owners/managers not only read this message board but take anything said even slightly seriously?

Stunning levels of delusion.
Delusion has caused the O.P. to be asked.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 1:09 pm
by CreamofSumYungGai
Buckingham wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:53 pm Do people seriously believe that club owners/managers not only read this message board but take anything said even slightly seriously?

Stunning levels of delusion.
They do.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:10 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
They 100% do.

Thing is about all these things that the big shots say, aren’t ludicrous, out there comments. It’s just people who have a blinkered view or simple pack of knowledge think we are asking for the ridiculous and being negative.

Everyone with half a brain knows what we need. That includes the owners.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:11 pm
by Lucky7
Big ShotsπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

More Comedy Gold on a Sunday!!

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:46 pm
by Millennial Snowflake
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:10 pm They 100% do.

Thing is about all these things that the big shots say, aren’t ludicrous, out there comments. It’s just people who have a blinkered view or simple pack of knowledge think we are asking for the ridiculous and being negative.

Everyone with half a brain knows what we need. That includes the owners.
Agree with all that but I think the point is the owners/Ling didn't need to read this board to come to the conclusion that we need another midfielder

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 4:07 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Millennial Snowflake wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:46 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:10 pm They 100% do.

Thing is about all these things that the big shots say, aren’t ludicrous, out there comments. It’s just people who have a blinkered view or simple pack of knowledge think we are asking for the ridiculous and being negative.

Everyone with half a brain knows what we need. That includes the owners.
Agree with all that but I think the point is the owners/Ling didn't need to read this board to come to the conclusion that we need another midfielder
Ain’t that the truth.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 4:34 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Weird coincidence though...;)

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:42 pm
by Lucky7
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 4:34 pm Weird coincidence though...;)
Something that people have been banging on about for weeks is suddenly a coincidence πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:26 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Exactly. A few people on here who know football say it, the the club listen. Simples.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:33 pm
by BiggsyMalone
Talk on Twitter of a board out protest before the Norwich game if 3 forwards aren’t signed

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:38 pm
by Lucky7
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:26 pm Exactly. A few people on here who know football say it, the the club listen. Simples.
πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

What was that Public Enemy song again ? Hmmm

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:59 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
rebel without a pause?

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:04 pm
by Lucky7
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:59 pm rebel without a pause?
Nah

Hype something?

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:05 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Fight the Power

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:00 pm
by bobo66
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:50 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:37 pm It seems odd that we have not yet signed a midfielder. If we don't, we could be in big trouble.
We have signed Wright, but clearly need an enforcer in midfield. Blind Freddie could see that last year - why is it so hard for the club to not understand it?
Is Blind Freddie playing this year? Where did we get him from and does he play by radar, like a bat?

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 12:53 am
by O my gawd
bobo66 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:00 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:50 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:37 pm It seems odd that we have not yet signed a midfielder. If we don't, we could be in big trouble.
We have signed Wright, but clearly need an enforcer in midfield. Blind Freddie could see that last year - why is it so hard for the club to not understand it?
Is Blind Freddie playing this year? Where did we get him from and does he play by radar, like a bat?
He's still got 2 years on his contract at White Stick Wanderers & we haven't activated his Β£250,000 release clause............. Yet

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:25 pm
by Mikero
The way that Martin Ling sees the transfer market is that the best bargains tend to be closer to deadline days.
There a couple of reasons this works as when a club higher up the system buys in a striker, for instance, it geneally means that their third striker is relegated to fourth or even fifth choice and wants out. The other reason is that the club having spent out is happy to recoup some money for a player that does not want to stay.

I discussed this with Martin when he was manager and subsequently had a similar conversation with Kent Teague who can see the sense in it. Obviously you cannot build a whole squad this way but to keep enough funds back for a chance of a couple of better players seems sensible.

Mikero

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:50 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Are you good friends with Martin and Kent then? I mean, was it over lunch that you had these discussions?

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:15 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Mikero wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:25 pm The way that Martin Ling sees the transfer market is that the best bargains tend to be closer to deadline days.
There a couple of reasons this works as when a club higher up the system buys in a striker, for instance, it geneally means that their third striker is relegated to fourth or even fifth choice and wants out. The other reason is that the club having spent out is happy to recoup some money for a player that does not want to stay.

I discussed this with Martin when he was manager and subsequently had a similar conversation with Kent Teague who can see the sense in it. Obviously you cannot build a whole squad this way but to keep enough funds back for a chance of a couple of better players seems sensible.

Mikero
I think we all understand that logic. The better players get snapped up and the trickle down effect means we have a choice from those left over.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:19 pm
by eagwgw
Quite interesting but I checked Soccerbase for our transfers during Ling's tenure and it doesn't seem to be the case.

Permanent deals occurring within one week of the season starting or the January transfer window seem very thin on the ground.

Tom Youngs, Paul Connor, Clayton Fortune, Luke Guttridge are those who came in late. Youngs, Connor, Guttridge were January signings.

Clayton Fortune was the only late summer signing (signed 2 August). He is the only one that really fits the criteria of being displaced at a bigger club. Adam Chambers signed even later but seems a different case, he was at the club for pre-season and the contract was after he proved his fitness after a bad injury.

In fact it seems like Lingy liked his business to be done early. For the promotion side in 2005/2006, Garner and Tudor came in on 20 May/27 May.
For the 2007/2008 season where a hugely changed side topped the table, Purches, Melligan, Mkandawire, Terry, Nelson, Thornton all signed by the start of July.

I don't believe there is any advantage to waiting to the end, otherwise everyone would be at it. I also disagree with Ross about being at the back of the queue, I would still say we would be among the higher payers and location is a big draw given there are no other London clubs in League Two.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:29 pm
by Disoriented
eagwgw wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:19 pm Quite interesting but I checked Soccerbase for our transfers during Ling's tenure and it doesn't seem to be the case.

Permanent deals occurring within one week of the season starting or the January transfer window seem very thin on the ground.

Tom Youngs, Paul Connor, Clayton Fortune, Luke Guttridge are those who came in late. Youngs, Connor, Guttridge were January signings.

Clayton Fortune was the only late summer signing (signed 2 August). He is the only one that really fits the criteria of being displaced at a bigger club. Adam Chambers signed even later but seems a different case, he was at the club for pre-season and the contract was after he proved his fitness after a bad injury.

In fact it seems like Lingy liked his business to be done early. For the promotion side in 2005/2006, Garner and Tudor came in on 20 May/27 May.
For the 2007/2008 season where a hugely changed side topped the table, Purches, Melligan, Mkandawire, Terry, Nelson, Thornton all signed by the start of July.

I don't believe there is any advantage to waiting to the end, otherwise everyone would be at it. I also disagree with Ross about being at the back of the queue, I would still say we would be among the higher payers and location is a big draw given there are no other London clubs in League Two.
Well said.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:31 pm
by Buddy Manucci
It makes sense if we are still looking at the likes of Louis Dennis and expect they may become available later in the window.

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:17 pm
by Mikero
Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:50 pm Are you good friends with Martin and Kent then? I mean, was it over lunch that you had these discussions?
I spoke to Martin Ling several times on this suject when he was the club manager and briefly at Chelmsford Cathedral on the present situation. As for Kent Teague, he talks to many people at games, he even tweets his intinery so that if you want to talk to him you know where he will be. He is rare in English football that as a directer he wants to know what fans think. Give it a go sometime.

Mikero

Re: Why are Ling & the owners not adding to the squad?

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:52 pm
by O my gawd
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:29 pm
eagwgw wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:19 pm Quite interesting but I checked Soccerbase for our transfers during Ling's tenure and it doesn't seem to be the case.

Permanent deals occurring within one week of the season starting or the January transfer window seem very thin on the ground.

Tom Youngs, Paul Connor, Clayton Fortune, Luke Guttridge are those who came in late. Youngs, Connor, Guttridge were January signings.

Clayton Fortune was the only late summer signing (signed 2 August). He is the only one that really fits the criteria of being displaced at a bigger club. Adam Chambers signed even later but seems a different case, he was at the club for pre-season and the contract was after he proved his fitness after a bad injury.

In fact it seems like Lingy liked his business to be done early. For the promotion side in 2005/2006, Garner and Tudor came in on 20 May/27 May.
For the 2007/2008 season where a hugely changed side topped the table, Purches, Melligan, Mkandawire, Terry, Nelson, Thornton all signed by the start of July.

I don't believe there is any advantage to waiting to the end, otherwise everyone would be at it. I also disagree with Ross about being at the back of the queue, I would still say we would be among the higher payers and location is a big draw given there are no other London clubs in League Two.
Well said.
Can't you get anything right from?
Sorry to be pedantic, but it's well wrote πŸ˜‰