Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:14 am
It's possible to be both
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
He wasn’t there because he was on holiday at his second home.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 9:17 am The situation is so farcical that any event Johnson wasn't actually present for muddies the waters for him
Confusing for the general public - yes, at times. Confusing for the government? Now that would be quite an achievement wouldn't it, for a government to issue restrictions that they didn't understand themselves. Or, just maybe, they really don't give a sh-it.
The real risk here is that the rules may be used to show no laws were broken, as in the case with Cummings. Technically OK. But still wrong. And still an insult to the general public.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:16 am According to Full Fact the garden at Downing Street isnt a public place so the rules didn't apply. I guess the same would apply to our own gardens.
Agreed - and, perhaps more importantly, if they can claim that no rules were broken, even if on a technicality, then they can claim that they've not misled Parliament over the last 4 or 5 weeks. Personally, I'm less bothered by the actual wrongdoing of a year or two ago (bad tho that is), and more bothered by the fact that BJ and the rest of his horrible shower have repeatedly lied to the House and the rest of us in the attempted cover up.Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:45 pmThe real risk here is that the rules may be used to show no laws were broken, as in the case with Cummings. Technically OK. But still wrong. And still an insult to the general public.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:16 am According to Full Fact the garden at Downing Street isnt a public place so the rules didn't apply. I guess the same would apply to our own gardens.
You might be onto something.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 4:09 pm
A lot of these stories now coming from the telegraph is causing me to put my tin foil hat on and think that Johnson's team is leaking these things so the enquiry can assign this all to a cultural problem impossible to pin on a single person. Can already see people getting numbed to the new revelations because there are so many of them.
Can’t talk about your experience As a former Director in the U.K. arm of a Global Corporate Organisation, We held management meetings off-site for many reasons, alcohol in moderation and snacks not unusual. I frequently engaged in a serious business discussion over a glass of red. Also went to many seminars, exhibitions, presentations, customer visits and so on with the odd glass of wine available, sometimes offered at point of entry. No big deal. Not to get pissed but available as a social gesture to those who wanted it. None of these gatherings remotely came into the party class. That’s for sure.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:37 pmIt IS unusual to have alcohol in a work setting. In my day and probably yours too, as the Head of a Big Corporate it was work first and then the social. In those days we worked hard and played hard.Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:13 pmBring you own avoids cross contamination from bottles. Not unusual for wine at business working events. Pretty common in fact. Not unusual for organisations to have offsite meetings, in their case they have a secure garden. Our company used a local hotel.StillSpike wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:25 pm
I'm guessing it was BYOB so as to try to keep it "unofficial" - not dipping in to the wine cellars (which presumably would leave a paper trail) - If food was the only thing provided, then maybe they thought they'd be able to pass the consumption off as business-related. Rather defeats the object by sending out the invites on email, mind
Might be nonsense, of course.
Possible to have a working event that includes wine and nibbles, in a social setting. Not unusual. The issues is not that, it’s if it broke Covid regulations.
Blah, blah fuking blah. You even question the well documented fact that Boris is a big fat albino khunt of a LIAR.Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 6:28 pmCan’t talk about your experience As a former Director in the U.K. arm of a Global Corporate Organisation, We held management meetings off-site for many reasons, alcohol in moderation and snacks not unusual. I frequently engaged in a serious business discussion over a glass of red. Also went to many seminars, exhibitions, presentations, customer visits and so on with the odd glass of wine available, sometimes offered at point of entry. No big deal. Not to get pissed but available as a social gesture to those who wanted it. None of these gatherings remotely came into the party class. That’s for sure.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:37 pmIt IS unusual to have alcohol in a work setting. In my day and probably yours too, as the Head of a Big Corporate it was work first and then the social. In those days we worked hard and played hard.Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:13 pm
Bring you own avoids cross contamination from bottles. Not unusual for wine at business working events. Pretty common in fact. Not unusual for organisations to have offsite meetings, in their case they have a secure garden. Our company used a local hotel.
Possible to have a working event that includes wine and nibbles, in a social setting. Not unusual. The issues is not that, it’s if it broke Covid regulations.
Nor in fact is having a drink with a colleague moving on to pastures new. Alcohol being available does not mean it’s a party. That term is being used for pure political reasons.
The real issue here is separating what really happened with the political rhetoric. There are some serious issues to look into like have the regulations been broken, I’m not aware of alcohol being consumed being wrong under Covid regulations. I hope the review focuses on regulations. We all know that morally it was wrong. Shocking timing too. Apologies well justified. What I want to know is if laws have been broken and has Boris mislead the house.
Just you wait 'till I get him lecturing you about China too. Then you'll be f*cking sorry.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:10 pmBlah, blah fuking blah. You even question the well documented fact that Boris is a big fat albino khunt of a LIAR.Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 6:28 pm
Can’t talk about your experience As a former Director in the U.K. arm of a Global Corporate Organisation, We held management meetings off-site for many reasons, alcohol in moderation and snacks not unusual. I frequently engaged in a serious business discussion over a glass of red. Also went to many seminars, exhibitions, presentations, customer visits and so on with the odd glass of wine available, sometimes offered at point of entry. No big deal. Not to get pissed but available as a social gesture to those who wanted it. None of these gatherings remotely came into the party class. That’s for sure.
Nor in fact is having a drink with a colleague moving on to pastures new. Alcohol being available does not mean it’s a party. That term is being used for pure political reasons.
The real issue here is separating what really happened with the political rhetoric. There are some serious issues to look into like have the regulations been broken, I’m not aware of alcohol being consumed being wrong under Covid regulations. I hope the review focuses on regulations. We all know that morally it was wrong. Shocking timing too. Apologies well justified. What I want to know is if laws have been broken and has Boris mislead the house.