Tory Watch
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 566 times
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Tory Watch
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... al-reports
This will be the one that clinches it.
I’m no royalist but even I found it sad watching the old girl sitting alone as her husband was buried.
This will be the one that clinches it.
I’m no royalist but even I found it sad watching the old girl sitting alone as her husband was buried.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2444
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 1129 times
Re: Tory Watch
The situation is so farcical that any event Johnson wasn't actually present for muddies the waters for him and allows him to say there's a wider cultural problem rather than him being individually culpable for this stuff.
You'd think that surely couldn't work but it's the excuse he'll use to try to cling onto power.
You'd think that surely couldn't work but it's the excuse he'll use to try to cling onto power.
Re: Tory Watch
At least people are clear now on the fine details of the covid rules and when/where they applied.
Last year when the parties were taking place everyone was complaining about how confusing and stupid the rules were.
Last year when the parties were taking place everyone was complaining about how confusing and stupid the rules were.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14355
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2525 times
- Been thanked: 3315 times
Re: Tory Watch
According to Full Fact the garden at Downing Street isnt a public place so the rules didn't apply. I guess the same would apply to our own gardens.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Tory Watch
He wasn’t there because he was on holiday at his second home.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 9:17 am The situation is so farcical that any event Johnson wasn't actually present for muddies the waters for him
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9056
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1076 times
- Been thanked: 2503 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1128 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
Re: Tory Watch
Confusing for the general public - yes, at times. Confusing for the government? Now that would be quite an achievement wouldn't it, for a government to issue restrictions that they didn't understand themselves. Or, just maybe, they really don't give a sh-it.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 662 times
Re: Tory Watch
The real risk here is that the rules may be used to show no laws were broken, as in the case with Cummings. Technically OK. But still wrong. And still an insult to the general public.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:16 am According to Full Fact the garden at Downing Street isnt a public place so the rules didn't apply. I guess the same would apply to our own gardens.
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4184
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 518 times
- Been thanked: 1200 times
Re: Tory Watch
Agreed - and, perhaps more importantly, if they can claim that no rules were broken, even if on a technicality, then they can claim that they've not misled Parliament over the last 4 or 5 weeks. Personally, I'm less bothered by the actual wrongdoing of a year or two ago (bad tho that is), and more bothered by the fact that BJ and the rest of his horrible shower have repeatedly lied to the House and the rest of us in the attempted cover up.Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:45 pmThe real risk here is that the rules may be used to show no laws were broken, as in the case with Cummings. Technically OK. But still wrong. And still an insult to the general public.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:16 am According to Full Fact the garden at Downing Street isnt a public place so the rules didn't apply. I guess the same would apply to our own gardens.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1128 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
Re: Tory Watch
Nah, there's already been about 20 other issues that should have been. He'll cling on - like a slug on a bucket full of sh-ite
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2444
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 1129 times
Re: Tory Watch
Another party happened on December 17th, same day as Simon Chase held one (Chase being the guy that was supposed to investigate the originally reported party on December 18th).
Bearing in mind tier 4 and total London lockdown was announced on the 19th, is the reason we bungled the response around then cause everyone was on their arse hungover?
A lot of these stories now coming from the telegraph is causing me to put my tin foil hat on and think that Johnson's team is leaking these things so the enquiry can assign this all to a cultural problem impossible to pin on a single person. Can already see people getting numbed to the new revelations because there are so many of them.
Bearing in mind tier 4 and total London lockdown was announced on the 19th, is the reason we bungled the response around then cause everyone was on their arse hungover?
A lot of these stories now coming from the telegraph is causing me to put my tin foil hat on and think that Johnson's team is leaking these things so the enquiry can assign this all to a cultural problem impossible to pin on a single person. Can already see people getting numbed to the new revelations because there are so many of them.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Tory Watch
You might be onto something.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 4:09 pm
A lot of these stories now coming from the telegraph is causing me to put my tin foil hat on and think that Johnson's team is leaking these things so the enquiry can assign this all to a cultural problem impossible to pin on a single person. Can already see people getting numbed to the new revelations because there are so many of them.
A cultural problem within politics, not just the Government, of course.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 662 times
Re: Tory Watch
Can’t talk about your experience As a former Director in the U.K. arm of a Global Corporate Organisation, We held management meetings off-site for many reasons, alcohol in moderation and snacks not unusual. I frequently engaged in a serious business discussion over a glass of red. Also went to many seminars, exhibitions, presentations, customer visits and so on with the odd glass of wine available, sometimes offered at point of entry. No big deal. Not to get pissed but available as a social gesture to those who wanted it. None of these gatherings remotely came into the party class. That’s for sure.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:37 pmIt IS unusual to have alcohol in a work setting. In my day and probably yours too, as the Head of a Big Corporate it was work first and then the social. In those days we worked hard and played hard.Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:13 pmBring you own avoids cross contamination from bottles. Not unusual for wine at business working events. Pretty common in fact. Not unusual for organisations to have offsite meetings, in their case they have a secure garden. Our company used a local hotel.StillSpike wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:25 pm
I'm guessing it was BYOB so as to try to keep it "unofficial" - not dipping in to the wine cellars (which presumably would leave a paper trail) - If food was the only thing provided, then maybe they thought they'd be able to pass the consumption off as business-related. Rather defeats the object by sending out the invites on email, mind
Might be nonsense, of course.
Possible to have a working event that includes wine and nibbles, in a social setting. Not unusual. The issues is not that, it’s if it broke Covid regulations.
Nor in fact is having a drink with a colleague moving on to pastures new. Alcohol being available does not mean it’s a party. That term is being used for pure political reasons.
The real issue here is separating what really happened with the political rhetoric. There are some serious issues to look into like have the regulations been broken, I’m not aware of alcohol being consumed being wrong under Covid regulations. I hope the review focuses on regulations. We all know that morally it was wrong. Shocking timing too. Apologies well justified. What I want to know is if laws have been broken and has Boris mislead the house.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1128 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14355
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2525 times
- Been thanked: 3315 times
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12375
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 995 times
- Been thanked: 2823 times
Re: Tory Watch
Blah, blah fuking blah. You even question the well documented fact that Boris is a big fat albino khunt of a LIAR.Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 6:28 pmCan’t talk about your experience As a former Director in the U.K. arm of a Global Corporate Organisation, We held management meetings off-site for many reasons, alcohol in moderation and snacks not unusual. I frequently engaged in a serious business discussion over a glass of red. Also went to many seminars, exhibitions, presentations, customer visits and so on with the odd glass of wine available, sometimes offered at point of entry. No big deal. Not to get pissed but available as a social gesture to those who wanted it. None of these gatherings remotely came into the party class. That’s for sure.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:37 pmIt IS unusual to have alcohol in a work setting. In my day and probably yours too, as the Head of a Big Corporate it was work first and then the social. In those days we worked hard and played hard.Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:13 pm
Bring you own avoids cross contamination from bottles. Not unusual for wine at business working events. Pretty common in fact. Not unusual for organisations to have offsite meetings, in their case they have a secure garden. Our company used a local hotel.
Possible to have a working event that includes wine and nibbles, in a social setting. Not unusual. The issues is not that, it’s if it broke Covid regulations.
Nor in fact is having a drink with a colleague moving on to pastures new. Alcohol being available does not mean it’s a party. That term is being used for pure political reasons.
The real issue here is separating what really happened with the political rhetoric. There are some serious issues to look into like have the regulations been broken, I’m not aware of alcohol being consumed being wrong under Covid regulations. I hope the review focuses on regulations. We all know that morally it was wrong. Shocking timing too. Apologies well justified. What I want to know is if laws have been broken and has Boris mislead the house.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1128 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9056
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1076 times
- Been thanked: 2503 times
Re: Tory Watch
Just you wait 'till I get him lecturing you about China too. Then you'll be f*cking sorry.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:10 pmBlah, blah fuking blah. You even question the well documented fact that Boris is a big fat albino khunt of a LIAR.Dohnut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 6:28 pm
Can’t talk about your experience As a former Director in the U.K. arm of a Global Corporate Organisation, We held management meetings off-site for many reasons, alcohol in moderation and snacks not unusual. I frequently engaged in a serious business discussion over a glass of red. Also went to many seminars, exhibitions, presentations, customer visits and so on with the odd glass of wine available, sometimes offered at point of entry. No big deal. Not to get pissed but available as a social gesture to those who wanted it. None of these gatherings remotely came into the party class. That’s for sure.
Nor in fact is having a drink with a colleague moving on to pastures new. Alcohol being available does not mean it’s a party. That term is being used for pure political reasons.
The real issue here is separating what really happened with the political rhetoric. There are some serious issues to look into like have the regulations been broken, I’m not aware of alcohol being consumed being wrong under Covid regulations. I hope the review focuses on regulations. We all know that morally it was wrong. Shocking timing too. Apologies well justified. What I want to know is if laws have been broken and has Boris mislead the house.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times