Page 184 of 259
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:26 am
by Proposition Joe
Grown up politics though, Dunnem. Got to remember this guy can chair a meeting.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:37 am
by Max Fowler
'There's nothing improper' is going to be a thing now, isn't it?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:47 am
by Dunners
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:50 am
by Dunners
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:26 am
Got to remember this guy can chair a meeting.
The thing is, up until fairly recently, that would have been an improvement.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:53 am
by Admin
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 06, 2023 10:56 am
The official line is definitely shifting, and this really should have been anticipated. Any avoidance to answer what should be a straightforward question is just going to reinforce the suggestion that the proper procedures have not been followed.
Shush! Don't question SKS. The grown-ups are now in charge.
Nice to see young Wesley confirming that Labour are now the official Tory 2nd XI.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 12:39 pm
by Proposition Joe
He's just the worst. An absolutely sewer of a man.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 1:04 pm
by CEB
That’s “say the quiet bit out loud”…. gone CRAZY!!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 1:30 pm
by Dunners
I wont hear a bad word said about Wes "man of the people" Streeting.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 11:51 am
by Max Fowler
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:02 pm
by Proposition Joe
It's quite the achievement for an opposition party to look quite so unappealing as an alternative to one of the worst, most increasingly right wing governments for generations. A one term cabinet (they're only having their quick turn, remember?) containing the likes of Reeves, Streeting and Lammy isn't worth anyone's vote.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:13 pm
by Max Fowler
It's just top level strategising and as soon as they're in power they're going to nationalise the fu*k out of everything, don't forget.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:23 pm
by Proposition Joe
Silly me.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 2:14 pm
by Max Fowler
Labour won't just STOP THE BOATS.
They are gonna STOP ALL BOATS.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/y ... fc6f&ei=13
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 2:25 pm
by Proposition Joe
LOL
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 3:34 pm
by E10EU
Anything racist and vile the Tories do, Labour will do better.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:31 pm
by Dunners
TRUMP Plumbing wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:13 pm
It's just top level strategising...
You may be right.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:44 pm
by spen666
Where is Lord Sutch when his country needs him
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:46 pm
by Max Fowler
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:31 pm
TRUMP Plumbing wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:13 pm
It's just top level strategising...
You may be right.
The battle with Sir Gary of Leicestershire has worked well.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 6:44 pm
by Friend or fart
Anyone watch Angela Rayner tackling the Arch-Bully at PMQ's today? I was particularly struck by the Government benches' silence when she laid into him. They didn't jeer or heckle and seem to enjoy watching him squirm. To me he looked like a dead man walking ( surely that should be sitting )
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:16 am
by Max B Gold
TRUMP Plumbing wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:46 pm
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:31 pm
TRUMP Plumbing wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:13 pm
It's just top level strategising...
You may be right.
The battle with Sir Gary of Leicestershire has worked well.
Anybody else thinking about getting themselves down to The North of Islington to campaign for Jeremy when the next GE is called?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:19 am
by Dunners
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:16 am
TRUMP Plumbing wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:46 pm
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:31 pm
You may be right.
The battle with Sir Gary of Leicestershire has worked well.
Anybody else thinking about getting themselves down to The North of Islington to campaign for Jeremy when the next GE is called?
Let's do it. You bring the booze, and I'll bring the hair dye.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:28 am
by faldO
Sir Kier has said today Labour will freeze council tax this year (even though they're not in government) with a PROPER windfall tax on energy companies.
However, Rachel Reeves has said Labour will not commit to freezing council tax for a year if/when they win the next general election because she "won't announce any spending increases or tax cuts that aren't fully costed and fully funded".
My council tax (Labour council) has gone up by nearly 10% this year.
It's all very confusing...
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:28 am
by BoniO
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:02 pm
It's quite the achievement for an opposition party to look quite so unappealing as an alternative to one of the worst, most increasingly right wing governments for generations. A one term cabinet (they're only having their quick turn, remember?) containing the likes of Reeves, Streeting and Lammy isn't worth anyone's vote.
Not at all. Whilst the current Labour leadership team is far from perfect what is the alternative? Another term for the Tories.
I’d vote for just about any party, and any imperfect individual to remove the Tories. I really can’t be arsed with arguing about how far to the right Labour, in parts, has become. They are not the current Tory party, that’s the bottom line.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:38 am
by Max B Gold
BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:28 am
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:02 pm
It's quite the achievement for an opposition party to look quite so unappealing as an alternative to one of the worst, most increasingly right wing governments for generations. A one term cabinet (they're only having their quick turn, remember?) containing the likes of Reeves, Streeting and Lammy isn't worth anyone's vote.
Not at all. Whilst the current Labour leadership team is far from perfect what is the alternative? Another term for the Tories.
I’d vote for just about any party, and any imperfect individual to remove the Tories. I really can’t be arsed with arguing about how far to the right Labour, in parts, has become. They are not the current Tory party, that’s the bottom line.
True they are not the current Tory Party probably more like the Davie Cameron version.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:40 am
by Max Fowler
BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:28 am
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:02 pm
It's quite the achievement for an opposition party to look quite so unappealing as an alternative to one of the worst, most increasingly right wing governments for generations. A one term cabinet (they're only having their quick turn, remember?) containing the likes of Reeves, Streeting and Lammy isn't worth anyone's vote.
Not at all. Whilst the current Labour leadership team is far from perfect what is the alternative? Another term for the Tories.
I’d vote for just about any party, and any imperfect individual to remove the Tories. I really can’t be arsed with arguing about how far to the right Labour, in parts, has become. They are not the current Tory party, that’s the bottom line.
And so the circle of $hite continues.