Israel

[BoniO]

Oh sh*t - I've gone and woken up the biggest genocide supporter on here. My apologies to all the reasonable folk on here.

[FrankOFile]

Oh sh*t - I've gone and woken up the biggest genocide supporter on here. My apologies to all the reasonable folk on here.

So you simply cannot, or will not, explain your misuse of the word ‘genocide’. It seems that you are singularly incapable of doing so or in fact understanding anything related to the history of the region.

Fair enough. Remain complicit in your support for anti semitism, rampant misogyny and compete hatred toward homosexuals or anyone showing anything contrary to the Islamic faith.

Do you have a daughter? If so, where would you rather she live - in Israel or Gaza?

[Rich Tea Wellin]

The ignorance shown by that Jonathan about what is really happening is mindblowing!!!
Has he not seen the pictures of death, starvation and destruction inflicted on Gaza by his Israeli army, politicians and endorsed by people like himself?

You’re being too kind mate. It’s not ignorance, he’s lying, he knows he’s lying and he doesn’t give a flying f*ck about the genocide.

Same as the Kent’s who continue to defend Israel. Cut from the same soiled and corrupted cloth.

Genocide. Do you know what one is, or do you simply trot out the same tropes every time you stop jacking off and post on here.

Israel has an unbroken 300 year old historical and archeological connection to the holy land. ‘Palestinians’ none. What part of that is hard to understand?

Are you sure about that? You’re saying Palestinians have no connection with Palestine?

Regardless, out of interest, do you think the U.K. still has a claim over the USA considering 300 years ago we owned it?

[Bandy Legs]

The ignorance shown by that Jonathan about what is really happening is mindblowing!!!
Has he not seen the pictures of death, starvation and destruction inflicted on Gaza by his Israeli army, politicians and endorsed by people like himself?

You’re being too kind mate. It’s not ignorance, he’s lying, he knows he’s lying and he doesn’t give a flying f*ck about the genocide.

Same as the Kent’s who continue to defend Israel. Cut from the same soiled and corrupted cloth.

Genocide. Do you know what one is, or do you simply trot out the same tropes every time you stop jacking off and post on here.

Israel has an unbroken 300 year old historical and archeological connection to the holy land. ‘Palestinians’ none. What part of that is hard to understand?

300 years ?
: : :
: : :
: :
: :

The Brits had given up on North America
not long after that ya Melt .

Imagine Moses knowing who Abraham Lincoln was

[norfolkO]

I suspect it's a typo - 3000 years - wouldn't get too excited about it.

[Bandy Legs]

I suspect it's a typo - 3000 years - wouldn't get too excited about it.

Its a Troll of the highest Order.
Asks about do you know what genocide is & then cant even get the claim over land correct

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Imagine using something 3000 years ago to justify the killing of innocent babies.

[BoniO]

Imagine using something 3000 years ago to justify the killing of innocent babies.

And did that “thing” even happen or are we talking about fairy tales?

[FrankOFile]

You’re being too kind mate. It’s not ignorance, he’s lying, he knows he’s lying and he doesn’t give a flying f*ck about the genocide.

Same as the Kent’s who continue to defend Israel. Cut from the same soiled and corrupted cloth.

Genocide. Do you know what one is, or do you simply trot out the same tropes every time you stop jacking off and post on here.

Israel has an unbroken 300 year old historical and archeological connection to the holy land. ‘Palestinians’ none. What part of that is hard to understand?

Are you sure about that? You’re saying Palestinians have no connection with Palestine?

Regardless, out of interest, do you think the U.K. still has a claim over the USA considering 300 years ago we owned it?

Any scholar worth his qualifications knows that Jewish people are the original inhabitants of the land referred to now as Israel and that 1947 was simply about re-establishing that fact from the Palestinian invaders. All archeological evidence, as well as biblical references, show that the Jewish people have been in this land for 3000 years. It is not about having a ‘claim’ as you quaintly put it, but a right to assert that Israel has always been Jewish and always will be. So your UK / USA bizarre reference can also illustrate that because the UK occupied the USA for a period then of course it has no claim over it. The same goes for Palestinians in Israel, even though they didn’t even ‘own’ it.

Happy to set you straight.

[FrankOFile]

Imagine using something 3000 years ago to justify the killing of innocent babies.

You find it hard to take one point and not conflate it with some nonsense of your own.

These lines you draw between two disconnected points - are they made with crayons?

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Imagine using something 3000 years ago to justify the killing of innocent babies.

You find it hard to take one point and not conflate it with some nonsense of your own.

These lines you draw between two disconnected points - are they made with crayons?

Your ancient borders are.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Genocide. Do you know what one is, or do you simply trot out the same tropes every time you stop jacking off and post on here.

Israel has an unbroken 300 year old historical and archeological connection to the holy land. ‘Palestinians’ none. What part of that is hard to understand?

Are you sure about that? You’re saying Palestinians have no connection with Palestine?

Regardless, out of interest, do you think the U.K. still has a claim over the USA considering 300 years ago we owned it?

Any scholar worth his qualifications knows that Jewish people are the original inhabitants of the land referred to now as Israel and that 1947 was simply about re-establishing that fact from the Palestinian invaders. All archeological evidence, as well as biblical references, show that the Jewish people have been in this land for 3000 years. It is not about having a ‘claim’ as you quaintly put it, but a right to assert that Israel has always been Jewish and always will be. So your UK / USA bizarre reference can also illustrate that because the UK occupied the USA for a period then of course it has no claim over it. The same goes for Palestinians in Israel, even though they didn’t even ‘own’ it.

Happy to set you straight.

Even if all your claims are right, it has no real world value today. Imagine applying a 3000 (or 300) year old “right” to any sensible political or logical argument today. Anything to not think about what the Israeli government is doing eh? Keep your head in that ancient sand of yours mate, it’s better off there

[spen666]

Are you sure about that? You’re saying Palestinians have no connection with Palestine?

Regardless, out of interest, do you think the U.K. still has a claim over the USA considering 300 years ago we owned it?

Any scholar worth his qualifications knows that Jewish people are the original inhabitants of the land referred to now as Israel and that 1947 was simply about re-establishing that fact from the Palestinian invaders. All archeological evidence, as well as biblical references, show that the Jewish people have been in this land for 3000 years. It is not about having a ‘claim’ as you quaintly put it, but a right to assert that Israel has always been Jewish and always will be. So your UK / USA bizarre reference can also illustrate that because the UK occupied the USA for a period then of course it has no claim over it. The same goes for Palestinians in Israel, even though they didn’t even ‘own’ it.

Happy to set you straight.

Even if all your claims are right, it has no real world value today. Imagine applying a 3000 (or 300) year old “right” to any sensible political or logical argument today. Anything to not think about what the Israeli government is doing eh? Keep your head in that ancient sand of yours mate, it’s better off there

You mean like the rights from the 10 commandments against killing or theft. How non sensible they are today

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Any scholar worth his qualifications knows that Jewish people are the original inhabitants of the land referred to now as Israel and that 1947 was simply about re-establishing that fact from the Palestinian invaders. All archeological evidence, as well as biblical references, show that the Jewish people have been in this land for 3000 years. It is not about having a ‘claim’ as you quaintly put it, but a right to assert that Israel has always been Jewish and always will be. So your UK / USA bizarre reference can also illustrate that because the UK occupied the USA for a period then of course it has no claim over it. The same goes for Palestinians in Israel, even though they didn’t even ‘own’ it.

Happy to set you straight.

Even if all your claims are right, it has no real world value today. Imagine applying a 3000 (or 300) year old “right” to any sensible political or logical argument today. Anything to not think about what the Israeli government is doing eh? Keep your head in that ancient sand of yours mate, it’s better off there

You mean like the rights from the 10 commandments against killing or theft. How non sensible they are today

Can you explain how killing or theft is a right? Or have you crowbarred in a strange argument to back up your mate that doesn’t make sense?

I’ll ignore the fact you’re also referencing something that almost certainly is based on religious mumbo jumbo, as I know you like to bae things strictly on the facts.

[Hoover Attack]

Mate, there are biblical references, you can't ignore that.

[spen666]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gy927jx88o

[VeganO]

Genocide. Do you know what one is, or do you simply trot out the same tropes every time you stop jacking off and post on here.

Israel has an unbroken 300 year old historical and archeological connection to the holy land. ‘Palestinians’ none. What part of that is hard to understand?

Are you sure about that? You’re saying Palestinians have no connection with Palestine?

Regardless, out of interest, do you think the U.K. still has a claim over the USA considering 300 years ago we owned it?

Any scholar worth his qualifications knows that Jewish people are the original inhabitants of the land referred to now as Israel and that 1947 was simply about re-establishing that fact from the Palestinian invaders. All archeological evidence, as well as biblical references, show that the Jewish people have been in this land for 3000 years. It is not about having a ‘claim’ as you quaintly put it, but a right to assert that Israel has always been Jewish and always will be. So your UK / USA bizarre reference can also illustrate that because the UK occupied the USA for a period then of course it has no claim over it. The same goes for Palestinians in Israel, even though they didn’t even ‘own’ it.

Happy to set you straight.

Anything it seems to justify what Israel is doing. The use of the word invaders is a telling one, therefore in your mind it justifies everything that was done in the Nakba to Palestinians & everything that's been done since.
Your morality is twisted as your view is clearly that the killing of Jews is appalling but not Palestinians.
There's a simple maxim- if you do not condemn the killing of both Jewish & Palestinian people, especially children, then you have no humanity. And you have no humanity.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
I find the views of those who justify Israel's genocidal actions to be revolting.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

It’s been a week or so, it’s about time Frank comes on here, becomes
Overly aggressive, get in the wrong side of history then leave again

[BoniO]

Is Andy Burnham an Israeli plant as our next PM?

[Qin]

Is Andy Burnham an Israeli plant as our next PM?

Seems to me, if you're not a member of Labour Friends of Israel, you can't get into any position of power.
Ten years ago, Burnham said the first country he would visit if elected leader would be Israel

So I guess the answer to your question is. Yes

[BoniO]

Josh Simons - the sitting Makerfield MP who stood down to allow Burnham to stand has longstanding relationships with Friends of Israel groups, and has stated that he could apply for Israeli citizenship.

Burnham is a bit wobbly on the topic of Israel/Palestine, but being given a chance to become PM by an Israel supporter might make one think that he might have become more aligned with one side. We shall see.

[VeganO]

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Bc4Bacv3g/

Meanwhile the Indy reports that a UN inquiry has concluded that Israeli has deliberately targeted Palestinian children.
Yet more evidence, if it were needed, of Israel's genocide.
Sadly the genocide apologists & deniers will no doubt continue to distort & lie.

[VeganO]

Here's a list of the organisations etc that the Israeli Government tell us are lying.
It would therefore appear that they are claiming that there is a world-wide conspiracy against them.
I wonder why they have not allowed journalists to go into Gaza.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1Cqot9GvXT/

[Bandy Legs]

China calls out Israel.
About tkme they got involved

[VeganO]

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GaYQsrZ7t/

Israel deliberately targets Palestinian children, makes perfect sense as part of their genocide project