Labour Watch

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6214
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 389 times
Been thanked: 1482 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:22 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:01 pm Pretty sure the reason they’re bankrupt is because of Corbyns court cases.
What court cases?
Labour are broke because 200,000 members left, and they not paying a subscription any more, plus 2 unions not giving Labour any funds now, because they have left their working class roots.
A general election now, would finish Labour off financially
They would lose it too, despite Johnson and his unpopularity.
Starmer is a liability
Who would you vote for in a general election?
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2883
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Currywurst and Chips wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:41 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:22 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:01 pm Pretty sure the reason they’re bankrupt is because of Corbyns court cases.
What court cases?
Labour are broke because 200,000 members left, and they not paying a subscription any more, plus 2 unions not giving Labour any funds now, because they have left their working class roots.
A general election now, would finish Labour off financially
They would lose it too, despite Johnson and his unpopularity.
Starmer is a liability
Who would you vote for in a general election?
Broke is an interesting and important point. Whilst parties are beholden to business or unions then external pressures will continue to be applied. Starmer is under pressure right now from Unite, I think. Could be someone else. And of course the Tories always listen to big funders.

I wonder if it’s time for the state to fund parties, level playing field stuff. Parties that historically command a decent percentage of the vote (not seats). Then parties are free to produce policy in line with what the party feel they should be.

On the question of Starmer being a liability. I would argue right now Boris is the bigger liability and Starmer, with the right
policies would have a half decent chance. He is let down by a lack of gravitas. Needs to up his image. Boring. But that don’t mean not able.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

The tories aren’t beholden to Business. They’re beholden to a handful of billionaire/millionaire business owners. Whose interests you somehow believe align with yours. Bizarre.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2883
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:18 pm The tories aren’t beholden to Business. They’re beholden to a handful of billionaire/millionaire business owners. Whose interests you somehow believe align with yours. Bizarre.
I did of course say *big funders” in my post, you must have missed that, which is exactly the point you have made. And you have absolutely no way of knowing if their interests align with mine. That is just malicious garbage.
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10532
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4567 times
Been thanked: 3230 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

Dohnut wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:27 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:18 pm The tories aren’t beholden to Business. They’re beholden to a handful of billionaire/millionaire business owners. Whose interests you somehow believe align with yours. Bizarre.
I did of course say *big funders” in my post, you must have missed that, which is exactly the point you have made. And you have absolutely no way of knowing if their interests align with mine. That is just malicious garbage.
Id be willing to bet that their interests don’t align with yours, as much as you fool yourself that they do
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Dohnut wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:27 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:18 pm The tories aren’t beholden to Business. They’re beholden to a handful of billionaire/millionaire business owners. Whose interests you somehow believe align with yours. Bizarre.
I did of course say *big funders” in my post, you must have missed that, which is exactly the point you have made. And you have absolutely no way of knowing if their interests align with mine. That is just malicious garbage.
“Whilst parties are beholden to business or unions then external pressures”

Your words dohy.

And no, their interests do not align with yours. Sorry.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2883
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:56 pm
Dohnut wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:27 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:18 pm The tories aren’t beholden to Business. They’re beholden to a handful of billionaire/millionaire business owners. Whose interests you somehow believe align with yours. Bizarre.
I did of course say *big funders” in my post, you must have missed that, which is exactly the point you have made. And you have absolutely no way of knowing if their interests align with mine. That is just malicious garbage.
“Whilst parties are beholden to business or unions then external pressures”

Your words dohy.

And no, their interests do not align with yours. Sorry.
I did say they listen to big funders. But let’s not split hairs. That sort of thing gets tedious. And you have no idea how their ideas align to mine. You don’t know me nor my ideas and neither do you know theirs. You just think you do which is a whole different thing.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

I didn’t say ideas, I said interests.

It’s very possible your ‘ideas’ do align with theirs.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

You are so wrong
Dohnut wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:10 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:41 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:22 pm

What court cases?
Labour are broke because 200,000 members left, and they not paying a subscription any more, plus 2 unions not giving Labour any funds now, because they have left their working class roots.
A general election now, would finish Labour off financially
They would lose it too, despite Johnson and his unpopularity.
Starmer is a liability
Who would you vote for in a general election?
Broke is an interesting and important point. Whilst parties are beholden to business or unions then external pressures will continue to be applied. Starmer is under pressure right now from Unite, I think. Could be someone else. And of course the Tories always listen to big funders.

I wonder if it’s time for the state to fund parties, level playing field stuff. Parties that historically command a decent percentage of the vote (not seats). Then parties are free to produce policy in line with what the party feel they should be.

On the question of Starmer being a liability. I would argue right now Boris is the bigger liability and Starmer, with the right
policies would have a half decent chance. He is let down by a lack of gravitas. Needs to up his image. Boring. But that don’t mean not able.
Billionaire Tory donor calls for Boris Johnson to resign

John Armitage, who has given £3.1m to the Conservatives, says PM has gone ’past the point of no return’


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -to-resign
User avatar
faldO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:21 pm
Been thanked: 245 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by faldO »

The Labour Party has advertised for a "Director of Attack and Rebuttal"

https://labour.org.uk/current-vacancies ... -rebuttal/

Perhaps the O's should have one too!
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12303
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 981 times
Been thanked: 2798 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

tuffers#1 wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:23 pm You are so wrong
Dohnut wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:10 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:41 pm

Who would you vote for in a general election?
Broke is an interesting and important point. Whilst parties are beholden to business or unions then external pressures will continue to be applied. Starmer is under pressure right now from Unite, I think. Could be someone else. And of course the Tories always listen to big funders.

I wonder if it’s time for the state to fund parties, level playing field stuff. Parties that historically command a decent percentage of the vote (not seats). Then parties are free to produce policy in line with what the party feel they should be.

On the question of Starmer being a liability. I would argue right now Boris is the bigger liability and Starmer, with the right
policies would have a half decent chance. He is let down by a lack of gravitas. Needs to up his image. Boring. But that don’t mean not able.
Billionaire Tory donor calls for Boris Johnson to resign

John Armitage, who has given £3.1m to the Conservatives, says PM has gone ’past the point of no return’


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -to-resign
Shouldn't it be "Billionaire Tory paymaster demands his bought and paid for lackey resigns."
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Max B Gold wrote: Mon Feb 14, 2022 4:48 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:23 pm You are so wrong
Dohnut wrote: Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:10 pm

Broke is an interesting and important point. Whilst parties are beholden to business or unions then external pressures will continue to be applied. Starmer is under pressure right now from Unite, I think. Could be someone else. And of course the Tories always listen to big funders.

I wonder if it’s time for the state to fund parties, level playing field stuff. Parties that historically command a decent percentage of the vote (not seats). Then parties are free to produce policy in line with what the party feel they should be.

On the question of Starmer being a liability. I would argue right now Boris is the bigger liability and Starmer, with the right
policies would have a half decent chance. He is let down by a lack of gravitas. Needs to up his image. Boring. But that don’t mean not able.
Billionaire Tory donor calls for Boris Johnson to resign

John Armitage, who has given £3.1m to the Conservatives, says PM has gone ’past the point of no return’


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -to-resign
Shouldn't it be "Billionaire Tory paymaster demands his bought and paid for lackey resigns."
I'm not sure
It might mean bite the cyanide pill !
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1066 times
Been thanked: 2491 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dunners »

I, er, agree with David Lammy.

User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12303
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 981 times
Been thanked: 2798 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

Dunners wrote: Thu Feb 17, 2022 9:22 pm I, er, agree with David Lammy.

Hmm - didn't Noo Labour open up the laundromat with the golden visa scheme?
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1066 times
Been thanked: 2491 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dunners »

Yep. And now NuNew Labour is going to shut it.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1066 times
Been thanked: 2491 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dunners »

Sir Kier calling it right:

User avatar
faldO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:21 pm
Been thanked: 245 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by faldO »

John Bercow found to be ‘serial bully’ and liar by independent inquiry
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ng-inquiry

The former House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been found to be a “serial bully” and liar by an independent inquiry, which has banned him from holding a parliamentary pass and said he could have been expelled from the Commons if still an MP.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Max Fowler »

faldO wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 11:49 am John Bercow found to be ‘serial bully’ and liar by independent inquiry
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ng-inquiry

The former House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been found to be a “serial bully” and liar by an independent inquiry, which has banned him from holding a parliamentary pass and said he could have been expelled from the Commons if still an MP.
:lol:

Labour Watch?
User avatar
faldO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:21 pm
Been thanked: 245 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by faldO »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 11:58 am
faldO wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 11:49 am John Bercow found to be ‘serial bully’ and liar by independent inquiry
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ng-inquiry

The former House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been found to be a “serial bully” and liar by an independent inquiry, which has banned him from holding a parliamentary pass and said he could have been expelled from the Commons if still an MP.
:lol:

Labour Watch?
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

faldO wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 2:05 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 11:58 am
faldO wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 11:49 am John Bercow found to be ‘serial bully’ and liar by independent inquiry
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ng-inquiry

The former House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been found to be a “serial bully” and liar by an independent inquiry, which has banned him from holding a parliamentary pass and said he could have been expelled from the Commons if still an MP.
:lol:

Labour Watch?
But he was a Tory when alledged shouting & phone throwing occured .

Why didnt they attack him when he was still a Tory ?
User avatar
faldO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:21 pm
Been thanked: 245 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by faldO »

tuffers#1 wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:53 pm
But he was a Tory when alledged shouting & phone throwing occured .

Why didnt they attack him when he was still a Tory ?
He had his supporters and detractors on both side of the house, and he himself has always strenuously denied any wrongdoing, and still refuses to accept the judgment or any wrongdoing on his part. A formal investigation whilst he was still a Tory was blocked by MPs on the commons standards committee :
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ing-claims

Anyway, he has now been suspended from the Labour Party following the ruling, we must avoid upsetting Gary the Plumber any further by discussing it here, and any further discussion should take place on the Tory Watch thread.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Should never have been discussed in here at all .

Shocking Trolling !!

I should know i do enough of it !
User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3201
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:41 am
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 1121 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Admin »

Heh.

User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Admin wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:56 am Heh.

In an article “Rachel Riley deserves every bit of compensation for the hard-Left abuse she’s endured” (23 December 2021) written by Ian Austin, we suggested that Laura Murray, a former staff member at the Labour Party, was an “anti-Jewish racist” and part of the “vile anti-Semitism of Corbyn’s Labour” who had been stood up to by Rachel Riley during a recent court case. These allegations were and are untrue. We accept that there was and is no basis to suggest that Ms Murray is anti-Semitic. On the contrary; the court heard in unchallenged evidence that Ms Murray devoted significant time and energy to confronting and challenging antisemitism within the Labour Party whilst she was employed there. The Telegraph and Ian Austin apologise to Ms Murray. We have agreed to pay her substantial damages.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Starmer turns Johnson
Into a Blubbering Fool

Post Reply