Page 161 of 342

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:17 am
by Dunners
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:34 pm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54371559

Vaccine seems like a fantasy, after reading that.
Not surprised. Aside from the concern about any vaccine that has been rushed to market, it would still take a time to manufacture, distribute and then administer.

Still, our government has said that the strategy is to suppress Coronovirus until a vaccine is available.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:45 am
by Story of O
The longer it takes the more we will have to learn to live with it. These restrictions can't be sustained without serious consequences

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:52 am
by kokomO
Story of O wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:45 am The longer it takes the more we will have to learn to live with it. These restrictions can't be sustained without serious consequences
If only 10 years of conservatism hadn’t trashed the NHS eh.... :roll:

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:07 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
kokomO wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:52 am
Story of O wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:45 am The longer it takes the more we will have to learn to live with it. These restrictions can't be sustained without serious consequences
If only 10 years of conservatism hadn’t trashed the NHS eh.... :roll:
Don’t blame the tories, they had to deal with the mess they’d inherited and get that National Debt down.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:22 am
by kokomO
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:07 am
kokomO wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:52 am
Story of O wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:45 am The longer it takes the more we will have to learn to live with it. These restrictions can't be sustained without serious consequences
If only 10 years of conservatism hadn’t trashed the NHS eh.... :roll:
Don’t blame the tories, they had to deal with the mess they’d inherited and get that National Debt down.

Of course they did. :roll:

Funny the magic money has suddenly appeared now though isn’t it?

But hey, you keep believing the spin....

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:32 am
by Dunners
Ignore Ronnie Hotdogs, kokomO. He's just another Tory apologist.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:42 am
by A Pedant
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:07 am Don’t blame the tories, they had to deal with the mess they’d inherited and get that National Debt down.
National debt as a proportion of GDP was 69.6% when the Tories came into coalition government in 2010, and had risen to 86.4% by 2015 when they became a majority government. They'd managed to get it down to 85.2% by March 2019, but still massively higher than at any time in the previous Labour government (source).

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:51 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Shows just how bad the mess was then, if the debt kept on rising despite all that austerity.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:40 am
by kokomO
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:51 am Shows just how bad the mess was then, if the debt kept on rising despite all that austerity.
Austerity was a choice, it wasn't a no-option scenario by any means.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:57 pm
by Long slender neck
12872 new cases

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 10:04 pm
by Story of O
But only 49 deaths

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:28 am
by Thor
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:57 pm 12872 new cases
That’s obviously high however, we are testing more than ever before so you would expect that number to increase especially as the R number remains above 1. Thankfully the death numbers are not increasing in the same rate or matching the earlier increase in the infections curve.

If only people did what you’re supposed to do we would have a greater chance of surprising this virus more effectively. It’s a shame so many people don’t listen to the advice given.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:17 am
by BoniO
Thor wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:28 am
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:57 pm 12872 new cases
That’s obviously high however, we are testing more than ever before so you would expect that number to increase especially as the R number remains above 1. Thankfully the death numbers are not increasing in the same rate or matching the earlier increase in the infections curve.

If only people did what you’re supposed to do we would have a greater chance of surprising this virus more effectively. It’s a shame so many people don’t listen to the advice given.
The small increase in recent testing is not the cause of the increase in new cases of Covid. That needs to be completely debunked. Looking at Sept:-

On 31st August - 181038 tests were processed, and there were 1258 new cases

On 30th September - 232212 tests were processed, and there were 4456 new

The % increase in tests over this period was 28%, the increase in infection (new cases) was 254%

The numbers speak for themselves.

Source: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 12:30 pm
by Long slender neck
They're saying some sort of f*** up responsible for high number yesterday?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 12:33 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Under reporting on previous days so all those bell pieces with their "Look how wrong Witty's 50k prediction was" (Not a prediction by the way) will have to amend them

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 8:10 am
by Disoriented
BoniO wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:17 am
Thor wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:28 am
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:57 pm 12872 new cases
That’s obviously high however, we are testing more than ever before so you would expect that number to increase especially as the R number remains above 1. Thankfully the death numbers are not increasing in the same rate or matching the earlier increase in the infections curve.

If only people did what you’re supposed to do we would have a greater chance of surprising this virus more effectively. It’s a shame so many people don’t listen to the advice given.
The small increase in recent testing is not the cause of the increase in new cases of Covid. That needs to be completely debunked. Looking at Sept:-

On 31st August - 181038 tests were processed, and there were 1258 new cases

On 30th September - 232212 tests were processed, and there were 4456 new

The % increase in tests over this period was 28%, the increase in infection (new cases) was 254%

The numbers speak for themselves.

Source: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/
Did you just get a calculator as a present or something?😅

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:26 am
by BoniO
Haha - does look like that. To be fair I’d worked it roughly in my head and then threw it into excel. Old habits die hard.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:39 am
by Long slender neck
They're saying some sort of f*** up responsible for high number yesterday?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:45 am
by BoniO
Strange feeling of deja vu....

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:54 pm
by Mick McQuaid
BoniO wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:26 am Haha - does look like that. To be fair I’d worked it roughly in my head and then threw it into excel. Old habits die hard.
Well, if it's good enough for Dido....

Our world class track and trace system is a f*cking excel spreadsheet. Clearly she really learnt the lesson from Talk Talk on data security.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:17 pm
by Dohnut
Letter from the docs to book an appointment for a vaccine. Phone or online. After 20+ busy calls, decided to use online. Set up account etc etc. Went to book. Not available online.

15++++ calls finally got through, usual 20 minute wait, made booking for 6 weeks time, earliest. Mentioned online issue, they knew (so why put it in the sodding letter). Blamed Covid. Err. Not for a letter generated in their surgery it’s not.

None of this is massively important, routine jab offered to old farts. But it’s easy to see the spin off impact on the health of the nation and especially the oldies who perhaps can’t handle the phone/online crap.

Numbers issued each day, cases and deaths is the tip of a largely invisible iceberg.

Still, I’ve no doubt those who choose to flout the regulations don’t really give a toss do they

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:31 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Dohnut wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:17 pm Letter from the docs to book an appointment for a vaccine. Phone or online. After 20+ busy calls, decided to use online. Set up account etc etc. Went to book. Not available online.

15++++ calls finally got through, usual 20 minute wait, made booking for 6 weeks time, earliest. Mentioned online issue, they knew (so why put it in the sodding letter). Blamed Covid. Err. Not for a letter generated in their surgery it’s not.

Hope ur ok.

It's almost as if the system is at breaking point after 10 years of needless tory austerity.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:41 pm
by Mistadobalina
Mick McQuaid wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:54 pm
BoniO wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:26 am Haha - does look like that. To be fair I’d worked it roughly in my head and then threw it into excel. Old habits die hard.
Well, if it's good enough for Dido....

Our world class track and trace system is a f*cking excel spreadsheet. Clearly she really learnt the lesson from Talk Talk on data security.
Depresses the f*ck out of me on how little consequence there will be politically for the Tories decision to appoint mates, acolytes and former colleagues to positions of massive importance in dealing with this pandemic, and who seem to be all massively out of their depth. The curve in the UK now looks worse than the French one, where they are in full panic mode about the resurgence in cases.

They've completely f*cked this a second time. Defies belief.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:52 pm
by Mistadobalina
I thought the spreadsheet comment was a joke but :

'The problem was caused by an Excel spreadsheet reaching its maximum file size, which stopped new names being added in an automated process'.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:53 pm
by BoniO
Mistadobalina wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:41 pm
Mick McQuaid wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:54 pm
BoniO wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:26 am Haha - does look like that. To be fair I’d worked it roughly in my head and then threw it into excel. Old habits die hard.
Well, if it's good enough for Dido....

Our world class track and trace system is a f*cking excel spreadsheet. Clearly she really learnt the lesson from Talk Talk on data security.
Depresses the f*ck out of me on how little consequence there will be politically for the Tories decision to appoint mates, acolytes and former colleagues to positions of massive importance in dealing with this pandemic, and who seem to be all massively out of their depth. The curve in the UK now looks worse than the French one, where they are in full panic mode about the resurgence in cases.

They've completely f*cked this a second time. Defies belief.
Yes, but at least they have been consistent throughout this crisis.