Page 17 of 20
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:26 am
by Dunners
This is what performing fellatio via a social media platform looks like.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:29 am
by Dunners
I haven't seen a man beat a woman this bad since the Olympics.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:38 am
by Dunners
The UK Labour party aren't the only ones to have committed a diplomatic faux pas.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:45 am
by Yanzi Gravy
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:26 am
This is what performing fellatio via a social media platform looks like.
That Zelenskyy a bigger liability than Trump for sure. He is an inexperienced maniac.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 am
by Dunners
We can expect loads more of this codswallop. Meaningless soundbites and phrases uttered without any substance from a political class who still sleep under a pre-2008 comfort blanket.
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am
by Wally Banter
The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:11 am
by oxo
Wally Banter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am
The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
Probably the most clear-headed post I’ve ever seen on here
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:11 am
by BIGRON
I had a decent bet on Trump to win , I wonder when my bookie will pay out ? Is it 270 seats
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:15 am
by Mistadobalina
UK really pissing in the wind now, USA free trade deal was the big 'prize' of Brexit. Instead we're going to get hammered by trade tariffs without an economic bloc to attach ourselves to as the world gets a lot more protectionist.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:16 am
by Hoover Attack
Wally Banter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am
The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
Agreed this is the state of things but it’s not by chance.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:19 am
by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Yep. “We’ve had enough of experts” springs to mind.
Trump has always just been someone who happened to be very well placed to benefit from what Wally says
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 am
We can expect loads more of this codswallop. Meaningless soundbites and phrases uttered without any substance from a political class who still sleep under a pre-2008 comfort blanket.
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:21 am
by Wally Banter
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:16 am
Wally Banter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am
The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
Agreed this is the state of things but it’s not by chance.
Of course; what powerful person would want a politically educated public?
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:25 am
by Dunners
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 am
We can expect loads more of this codswallop. Meaningless soundbites and phrases uttered without any substance from a political class who still sleep under a pre-2008 comfort blanket.
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
So, who is against a climate? That suggests there are people who think a climate is a bad idea.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:25 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:26 am
This is what performing fellatio via a social media platform looks like.
Tbf ego massage is a clever idea when dealing with trump
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:27 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:25 am
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 am
We can expect loads more of this codswallop. Meaningless soundbites and phrases uttered without any substance from a political class who still sleep under a pre-2008 comfort blanket.
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
So, who is against a climate? That suggests there are people who think a climate is a bad idea.
It’s bollocks - trump is clearly very pro-women
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:28 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:15 am
UK really pissing in the wind now, USA free trade deal was the big 'prize' of Brexit. Instead we're going to get hammered by trade tariffs without an economic bloc to attach ourselves to as the world gets a lot more protectionist.
That's because we have the wrong party in power .
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:29 am
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:25 am
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 am
We can expect loads more of this codswallop. Meaningless soundbites and phrases uttered without any substance from a political class who still sleep under a pre-2008 comfort blanket.
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
So, who is against a climate? That suggests there are people who think a climate is a bad idea.
Not sure where you’re going with this?
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:32 am
by Dunners
Neither do I, to be honest.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:34 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Actually , I'm amazed Harris managed to get as many votes as she did . Ah, latest score has just come up on TV 276 for Trump 219 for Harris .
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:39 am
by Dunners
Has she actually managed to perform worse than Biden did in the last election in every county?
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:42 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:39 am
Has she actually managed to perform worse than Biden did in the last election in every county?
I don't know but I don't think Biden could have done any worse . Bloke on TV has just said Trump blew it out the park
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:43 am
by faldO
Well done to Trump and the Republicans, who won well. A victory for fascists, Nazis and garbage everywhere.
Hard not to feel sympathy for the Democrat leadership and liberal elite who chose probably the only person who could have lost to Trump. They put identity politics above competence and have paid the price.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:49 am
by RedDwarf 1881
faldO wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:43 am
Well done to Trump and the Republicans, who won well. A victory for fascists, Nazis and garbage everywhere.
Hard not to feel sympathy for the Democrat leadership and liberal elite who chose probably the only person who could have lost to Trump. They put identity politics above competence and have paid the price.
The problem is there's no point branding your political opponents things like that while having no answers for fixing the problems that you , yourself created . Trump is back in power because of the failure of left wing policies . Edit . I agree with your second point . I don't think the Democrats could have chosen a worse candidate who in turn chose the worse running mate . I still believe anybody half decent who actually knew what they were talking about would have given Trump a much tougher race
Re: Harris v. Trump
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:53 am
by Currywurst and Chips
He’s going to win every swing state