Page 159 of 264

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:32 pm
by Dohnut
StillSpike wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:20 pm Then I will happily withdraw the suggestion
I would be surprised if I ever called Corbyn that. My views about the need to talk with people who some may find offensive have always been pragmatic. Sometimes it’s the only way progress can be made.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:40 pm
by Thor
E10EU wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:30 pm Despite all the evidence and Chilcot's powerful conclusion, 'Sir Tony Blair' still maintains he did the right thing.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ar-inquiry

Dangerous arrogance or lack of conscience?
He doesn’t have a conscience of that it’s pretty clear however it’s his narcissistic tendencies which obviously shine through in his personality.

He should be in jail the scumbag.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:55 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:40 pm
E10EU wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:30 pm Despite all the evidence and Chilcot's powerful conclusion, 'Sir Tony Sir Tony Blair' still maintains he did the right thing.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ar-inquiry

Dangerous arrogance or lack of conscience?
He doesn’t have a conscience of that it’s pretty clear however it’s his narcissistic tendencies which obviously shine through in his personality.

He should be in jail the scumbag.
Absolute Nonesense !!!!

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:57 pm
by Thor
Oh no it’s not!

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:45 pm
by tuffers#1
Of course it is !! He has far less death on his hands than Churchill !!!

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:27 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:45 pm Of course it is !! He has far less death on his hands than Churchill !!!
That’s ok then. You are almost convincing me to like him. I suppose 200k civilian deaths is not that bad when you think about it. They had no homes standing anyway so probably better for them

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:32 pm
by tuffers#1
George M wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:27 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:45 pm Of course it is !! He has far less death on his hands than Churchill !!!
That’s ok then. You are almost convincing me to like him. I suppose 200k civilian deaths is not that bad when you think about it. They had no homes standing anyway so probably better for them
Churchill allowed a million to starve to death, no matter hes just a T*ry !

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:44 pm
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:45 pm Of course it is !! He has far less death on his hands than Churchill !!!
Take a break you need a lie down. Doctor.....

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:46 pm
by Thor
It's quite clear that even labour supporters on here are not backing the war criminal. If you've not signed the petition then please do so, we the people need to be heard and its only by standing together will the voices of the many be listened too.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:06 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:44 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:45 pm Of course it is !! He has far less death on his hands than Churchill !!!
Take a break you need a lie down. Doctor.....
thorgies back throwing weak arsed insults about . :lol: :lol:

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:06 pm
by George M
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:32 pm
George M wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:27 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:45 pm Of course it is !! He has far less death on his hands than Churchill !!!
That’s ok then. You are almost convincing me to like him. I suppose 200k civilian deaths is not that bad when you think about it. They had no homes standing anyway so probably better for them
Churchill allowed a million to starve to death, no matter hes just a T*ry !
What position do you have to be in the league table of deaths caused before you can’t qualify for an honour. Is it top 3.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:08 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:46 pm It's quite clear that even labour supporters on here are not backing the war criminal. If you've not signed the petition then please do so, we the people need to be heard and its only by standing together will the voices of the many be listened too.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: . Do you think Lily Bet is going to listen ? deluded petition !

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:12 pm
by tuffers#1
George M wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:06 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:32 pm
George M wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:27 pm

That’s ok then. You are almost convincing me to like him. I suppose 200k civilian deaths is not that bad when you think about it. They had no homes standing anyway so probably better for them
Churchill allowed a million to starve to death, no matter hes just a T*ry !
What position do you have to be in the league table of deaths caused before you can’t qualify for an honour. Is it top 3.
well churchill does have 5 times more blood on his hands & is Still a Sir , so maybe you should tell me ?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:17 pm
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:12 pm
George M wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:06 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:32 pm

Churchill allowed a million to starve to death, no matter hes just a T*ry !
What position do you have to be in the league table of deaths caused before you can’t qualify for an honour. Is it top 3.
well churchill does have 5 times more blood on his hands & is Still a Sir , so maybe you should tell me ?
Why do you live here and sponge off the government? If you hate our past and hate our way of life why don't you vote with you're feet and leave?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:27 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:17 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:12 pm
George M wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:06 pm

What position do you have to be in the league table of deaths caused before you can’t qualify for an honour. Is it top 3.
well churchill does have 5 times more blood on his hands & is Still a Sir , so maybe you should tell me ?
Why do you live here and sponge off the government? If you hate our past and hate our way of life why don't you vote with you're feet and leave?
who is sponging ? i dont think you have a clue how things work really do you ! :lol: :lol: :lol: P.S it seems you are the hater , calling for people to leave. All Ihave to say to that is this .

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:28 pm
by tuffers#1
Make Me .

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:43 pm
by Thor
Stop your hatefest then.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:47 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:43 pm Stop your hatefest then.
Youre the one signing petitions against your Queen Thorgie , not me ! :D :D :lol:

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:50 pm
by Story of O
If you want to get win an election you have to have polices the majority will vote for and although I always vote Labour I have not seen them winning for a long time. Socialist thinking is not what the vast majority in this country want.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:53 pm
by Thor
Story of O wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:50 pm If you want to get win an election you have to have polices the majority will vote for and although I always vote Labour I have not seen them winning for a long time. Socialist thinking is not what the vast majority in this country want.
Correct

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:03 pm
by tuffers#1
Story of O wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:50 pm If you want to get win an election you have to have polices the majority will vote for and although I always vote Labour I have not seen them winning for a long time. Socialist thinking is not what the vast majority in this country want.
no worries , the next election will be a massive t*ry defeat cheers to Bodge :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:11 pm
by Story of O
Logically that would happen, but that might only be when Labour sorts itself out

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:14 pm
by Story of O
And Johnson could well be gone by the next election and we get a more publicly acceptable face in charge, like Sunak

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:20 pm
by Stowaway
Story of O wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:14 pm And Johnson could well be gone by the next election and we get a more publicly acceptable face in charge, like Sunak
Sunak, a man so wealthy he makes Johnson look like a pauper. I suppose that might mean he won’t grab just any old bung coming at him, unlike Johnson.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:25 pm
by Dohnut
tuffers#1 wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:03 pm
Story of O wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:50 pm If you want to get win an election you have to have polices the majority will vote for and although I always vote Labour I have not seen them winning for a long time. Socialist thinking is not what the vast majority in this country want.
no worries , the next election will be a massive t*ry defeat cheers to Bodge :lol: :lol: :lol:
You think that’s what is going to happen? Really. The majority will reduce for sure. Inevitable.

But the test will be how popular and credible Labour policies are and how well Starmer presents them. And how the U.K. economy is doing. Much of the current sleaze stuff will be forgotten, or most likely not important to the majority of voters. Do you really think the majority care about who paid for his flat, Cummings will be history and so on.

Boris will probably piss all over Starmer as he did with Corbyn. He may be an asshole, but he’s good at what he does. The Tories will band together whilst Labour in-fighting will kick off and Momentum rubbish doing more harm.