Labour Watch

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6225
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 389 times
Been thanked: 1487 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

Thor wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 8:37 pm
Dunners wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:18 am How the hell has Starmer managed to catch Covid twice in three months?

Apparently this is now his sixth self-isolation period. It means that Labour are sending in Rayner to bat in today's PMQs.
Nick Ferrari said it was his third case of covid. He must be the unluckiest man alive, triple jabbed as well.
Guess natural immunity from being infected is bollocks then and people should get vaccinated instead eh?
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 8:02 pm
Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 7:10 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:55 pm

Not enough to put Bodge in jail unfortunately !
Lord Ahmed may not be so lucky.
righty so . Bodge might have tried to change the rules if he had been a TORT. Owen patterson anyone ?
Not quite the same really is it.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:22 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 8:02 pm
Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 7:10 pm

Lord Ahmed may not be so lucky.
righty so . Bodge might have tried to change the rules if he had been a TORT. Owen patterson anyone ?
Not quite the same really is it.
of course its not doh, Labour accept punishments Bodge Sc#m tries to break & change rules. glad you are starting to see the Truth at last.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:55 pm
Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:22 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 8:02 pm

righty so . Bodge might have tried to change the rules if he had been a TORT. Owen patterson anyone ?
Not quite the same really is it.
of course its not doh, Labour accept punishments Bodge Sc#m tries to break & change rules. glad you are starting to see the Truth at last.
Court of law. Thems the rules. No choice but to accept or appeal. Naff all to do with Labour accepting as you know.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:05 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:55 pm
Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:22 pm

Not quite the same really is it.
of course its not doh, Labour accept punishments Bodge Sc#m tries to break & change rules. glad you are starting to see the Truth at last.
Court of law. Thems the rules. No choice but to accept or appeal. Naff all to do with Labour accepting as you know.
youve agreed with me again Doh, its about Bodge not following rules & trying to change them . Is Da'Rius free yet ?
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:27 pm
Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:05 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:55 pm

of course its not doh, Labour accept punishments Bodge Sc#m tries to break & change rules. glad you are starting to see the Truth at last.
Court of law. Thems the rules. No choice but to accept or appeal. Naff all to do with Labour accepting as you know.
youve agreed with me again Doh, its about Bodge not following rules & trying to change them . Is Da'Rius free yet ?
Labour forum. Labour peer convicted. Won’t get any mileage will it, just diversions.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:51 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:27 pm
Dohnut wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:05 pm

Court of law. Thems the rules. No choice but to accept or appeal. Naff all to do with Labour accepting as you know.
youve agreed with me again Doh, its about Bodge not following rules & trying to change them . Is Da'Rius free yet ?
Labour forum. Labour peer convicted. Won’t get any mileage will it, just diversions.
well we rarely see you in T*ry watch so we have to bring light to the cowardice of others where we can . Keep the Red flag flying high so to speak :lol:
E10EU
Fresh Alias
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:12 am
Has thanked: 123 times
Been thanked: 169 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by E10EU »

The petition against TB's extra special Honour bestowed upon him by the Queen has now got over a million signatures.

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... 37ae990f41

But Starmer thinks that Tony B. is a very successful leader and deserves the award (but Johnson does not).

Starmer's leadership is supported by Tony B. and he has hired B's former major advisers to help him get into the top job.
A wise move or is Starmer getting himself tarnished by 'backing the wrong horse'?
Last edited by E10EU on Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Blair needs to judged on his whole time as PM and not on one controversial issue where many think he screwed up. Largely with the benefit of hindsight and even then the situation is not as clear as some suggest.

On that basis Blair in my opinion did a very good job. A job that was, at the time, considered good as the elections showed. Probably in the top 2 in our recent history.

Wish he was leading Labour now. It would be him and not Boris as PM.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:51 am Blair needs to judged on his whole time as PM and not on one controversial issue where many think he screwed up. Largely with the benefit of hindsight and even then the situation is not as clear as some suggest.

On that basis Blair in my opinion did a very good job. A job that was, at the time, considered good as the elections showed. Probably in the top 2 in our recent history.

Wish he was leading Labour now. It would be him and not Boris as PM.
Imagine coming to the defence of that war criminal Blair. Just imagine that. 😡
User avatar
Jack
Fresh Alias
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:44 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Jack »

After his stint as PM, Blair made millions 'advising' some of the worst tyrants in the world, with truly awful human rights records

Blair is a wrongun of the highest order
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:57 am
Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:51 am Blair needs to judged on his whole time as PM and not on one controversial issue where many think he screwed up. Largely with the benefit of hindsight and even then the situation is not as clear as some suggest.

On that basis Blair in my opinion did a very good job. A job that was, at the time, considered good as the elections showed. Probably in the top 2 in our recent history.

Wish he was leading Labour now. It would be him and not Boris as PM.
Imagine coming to the defence of that war criminal Blair. Just imagine that. 😡
Of course you are entitled to your opinion. Try to imagine other people having different opinions.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Jack wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:19 am After his stint as PM, Blair made millions 'advising' some of the worst tyrants in the world, with truly awful human rights records

Blair is a wrongun of the highest order
And there me thinking his Government was responsible for getting the human rights act enshrined in law in the U.K. part of a manifesto pledge in 87.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Thor »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:39 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:57 am
Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 8:51 am Blair needs to judged on his whole time as PM and not on one controversial issue where many think he screwed up. Largely with the benefit of hindsight and even then the situation is not as clear as some suggest.

On that basis Blair in my opinion did a very good job. A job that was, at the time, considered good as the elections showed. Probably in the top 2 in our recent history.

Wish he was leading Labour now. It would be him and not Boris as PM.
Imagine coming to the defence of that war criminal Blair. Just imagine that. 😡
Of course you are entitled to your opinion. Try to imagine other people having different opinions.
Dohnut you are so out of touch with life it’s proper scary.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:43 am
And there me thinking his Government was responsible for getting the human rights act enshrined in law in the U.K. part of a manifesto pledge in 87.
Blair wasn’t PM in 87, it was some other right wing c*nt.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:43 am
Jack wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:19 am After his stint as PM, Blair made millions 'advising' some of the worst tyrants in the world, with truly awful human rights records

Blair is a wrongun of the highest order
And there me thinking his Government was responsible for getting the human rights act enshrined in law in the U.K. part of a manifesto pledge in 87.
Havent the T#ry sc*m just got rid of that ?
User avatar
Jack
Fresh Alias
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:44 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Jack »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:43 am
Jack wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:19 am After his stint as PM, Blair made millions 'advising' some of the worst tyrants in the world, with truly awful human rights records

Blair is a wrongun of the highest order
And there me thinking his Government was responsible for getting the human rights act enshrined in law in the U.K. part of a manifesto pledge in 87.
When the mega bucks was available to him, he took whatever was offered.
Its a fact Blair was advisor to Uzbekistan, and Saudi, and others , with truly abysmal human rights records
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Jack wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:59 pm
Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:43 am
Jack wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:19 am After his stint as PM, Blair made millions 'advising' some of the worst tyrants in the world, with truly awful human rights records

Blair is a wrongun of the highest order
And there me thinking his Government was responsible for getting the human rights act enshrined in law in the U.K. part of a manifesto pledge in 87.
When the mega bucks was available to him, he took whatever was offered.
Its a fact Blair was advisor to Uzbekistan, and Saudi, and others , with truly abysmal human rights records
T*ry Sc*m dont deal with them ?
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14320
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2509 times
Been thanked: 3301 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Long slender neck »

Perhaps they needed some advice then?
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

In politics sometimes you have to deal with people whose values differ from yours in order to make progress. Politicians of all colours do this. Don’t mean you agree with them. Can mean you are trying to understand them and maybe change their views.

Routine.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2900
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 661 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Dohnut »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:47 pm
Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:43 am
And there me thinking his Government was responsible for getting the human rights act enshrined in law in the U.K. part of a manifesto pledge in 87.
Sir Tony Blair wasn’t PM in 87, it was some other right wing c*nt.
Apologies, the memory isn’t quite what is was. Googled it and it was 97 of course. It was TB and it was him who introduced it having put it into the Labour manifesto.

So the point stands. And thanks for allowing me the opportunity to say it again.
User avatar
StillSpike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 517 times
Been thanked: 1200 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by StillSpike »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:36 pm In politics sometimes you have to deal with people whose values differ from yours in order to make progress. Politicians of all colours do this. Don’t mean you agree with them. Can mean you are trying to understand them and maybe change their views.

Routine.
Pretty sure you called Corbyn a terrorist sympathiser at some point
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

StillSpike wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:01 pm
Dohnut wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:36 pm In politics sometimes you have to deal with people whose values differ from yours in order to make progress. Politicians of all colours do this. Don’t mean you agree with them. Can mean you are trying to understand them and maybe change their views.

Routine.
Pretty sure you called Corbyn a terrorist sympathiser at some point
If he did, I couldn’t find it. Just done a quick search and although there were 150 mentions of the term ‘Corbyn’ in his 2,000 posts, a ridiculous %age, none of them refer to terrorist sympathies.
User avatar
StillSpike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 517 times
Been thanked: 1200 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by StillSpike »

Then I will happily withdraw the suggestion
E10EU
Fresh Alias
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:12 am
Has thanked: 123 times
Been thanked: 169 times

Re: Labour Watch

Post by E10EU »

Despite all the evidence and Chilcot's powerful conclusion, 'Blair' still maintains he did the right thing.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ar-inquiry

Dangerous arrogance or lack of conscience?
Post Reply