Page 146 of 290

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2021 9:51 am
by tuffers#1
Brutal


Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:10 pm
by Max B Gold

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:12 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Smart move by BJ, half mill and barely anyone will notice

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:12 pm Smart move by BJ, half mill and barely anyone will notice
At least four others on this Board and the guy who tweeted it will have noticed. So about six in total not including the millions of Mirror readers.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:12 pm Smart move by BJ, half mill and barely anyone will notice
At least four others on this Board and the guy who tweeted it will have noticed. So about six in total not including the millions of Mirror readers.
Did NOT consider that

Along the lines of other Tory sleaze scandals do you reckon it'll be a: CON +1 or a CON +2?

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:25 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:10 pm
Literally no fucks given. :lol:

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:33 pm
by BoniO
Just how bad must you be to fail the Lords Appointments Commission?

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:52 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:12 pm Smart move by BJ, half mill and barely anyone will notice
At least four others on this Board and the guy who tweeted it will have noticed. So about six in total not including the millions of Mirror readers.
Did NOT consider that

Along the lines of other Tory sleaze scandals do you reckon it'll be a: CON +1 or a CON +2?
In a Banana Republic it's only an issue when the bananas run out.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:54 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:52 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm

At least four others on this Board and the guy who tweeted it will have noticed. So about six in total not including the millions of Mirror readers.
Did NOT consider that

Along the lines of other Tory sleaze scandals do you reckon it'll be a: CON +1 or a CON +2?
In a Banana Republic it's only an issue when the bananas run out.
That sounded more inspired and wise in your head than in reality

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:57 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:54 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:52 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm

Did NOT consider that

Along the lines of other Tory sleaze scandals do you reckon it'll be a: CON +1 or a CON +2?
In a Banana Republic it's only an issue when the bananas run out.
That sounded more inspired and wise in your head than in reality
I liked it and that's all that matters.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:04 am
by Dunners
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:12 pm Smart move by BJ, half mill and barely anyone will notice
At least four others on this Board and the guy who tweeted it will have noticed. So about six in total not including the millions of Mirror readers.
Did NOT consider that

Along the lines of other Tory sleaze scandals do you reckon it'll be a: CON +1 or a CON +2?
Turns out it was a CON +3. Bet you feel pretty foolish now.


Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:12 am
by ComeOnYouOs
Interesting that the Greens are only 1% short of double figures now.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:16 am
by Long slender neck
Who do yougov even poll?

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 12:08 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Dunners wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:04 am
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm

At least four others on this Board and the guy who tweeted it will have noticed. So about six in total not including the millions of Mirror readers.
Did NOT consider that

Along the lines of other Tory sleaze scandals do you reckon it'll be a: CON +1 or a CON +2?
Turns out it was a CON +3. Bet you feel pretty foolish now.

Reckon some of the Cummings momentum gave Donorgate the added push to get the +3.

Keep up the work lads, with enough angry link postings we can get to 50% by the end of the summer

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 4:15 pm
by tuffers#1
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/pete ... -5gfpnf90r

Peter Cruddas gave Tories £500,000
days after taking seat in Lords .

Cash For Peerage ?

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:53 pm
by E10EU
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -liz-truss

This has been hailed as a big success by Liz Truss .... her big deal reached with Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. What is their combined population?

The headline is also misleading. The reality is more like this quote from the article:

The deal otherwise echoes that between the UK and the EU, struck last Christmas Eve, with some improvements in the margins

It's more like chickens scratching a barren soil for a little grain, if lucky.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2021 12:17 am
by E10EU
Meanwhile Boris Johnson doesn't give a XXXX about the consequences of his bigly hailed "successful Brexit deal" on the basis of which he became the PM.

He made his chief negotiator David Frost a Lord in June 2020 .....

And now Lord Frost is bleating that the NI protocol he negotiated is unsustainable!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-57324713

Yet it was he who negotiated it and the outcome of his negotiations were hailed by Johnson as a SUCCESS!
So much so that he based his 2019 General Election campaign on it!

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2021 12:24 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:16 am Who do yougov even poll?
Your mum.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2021 1:09 am
by E10EU
And while all the proverbial s**t is beginning to hit the fan, the Brexiteers' guru is finding other ways for getting his devotees to finance his life style.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... o-messages

Obviously his play for power and glory through association with Donald Trump is no longer the ticket he had hoped for.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2021 1:40 am
by E10EU
On 26th of May Dominique Cummins gives 7 hours of evidence to the HOC select committee which exposes Johnson's inadequacies .....
On 29th of May Johnson finds some way to compromise Catholic wedding rules to pull a stunt and get married despite twice divorced.

Oh what lovely photos of them frolicking in the garden of No.10 with daisy chains in the hair. :-)

It certainly pushed Cummins' evidence off the head lines !!!

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2021 6:52 am
by Dunners
The couple did look lovely on their wedding day though.

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:43 am
by Dunners
One day we'll look back on this in wonder.


Conservative 44% (+4)
Labour 35% (-2)
Green 7%
LibDems 6%

Ipsos MORI May 28-June 3

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:50 am
by Kimpon
Dunners wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:43 am One day we'll look back on this in wonder.


Conservative 44% (+4)
Labour 35% (-2)
Green 7%
LibDems 6%

Ipsos MORI May 28-June 3
Long time away

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 2:05 pm
by Dunners
And there you have it. Putting everything else to one side, I just can't see what Starmer can do to recover this ground. His best option would probably be to sit tight in the hope that Johnson does something that completely destroys his own reputation with electorate.

Image

Re: Tory Watch

Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:05 pm
by tuffers#1
Dunners wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 2:05 pm And there you have it. Putting everything else to one side, I just can't see what Starmer can do to recover this ground. His best option would probably be to sit tight in the hope that Johnson does something that completely destroys his own reputation with electorate.

Image

So Johnston is out of touch with ordinary people & Less Honest
According to this . It sounds like he is already destroying his own reputation .