The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
My agenda is the same as every civilised person in the world. An end to the Genocide , a return to peace , and punishment in an international court for those who deserve it. What’s yours ?Frogger wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:04 pmErr no, I’m saying that the terrorist group you sympathise with is telling you lies, but don’t let that get in the way of your agenda.
Bye. Missing you already.
Which definition of genocide are you using? The one used by the ICJ - in which case Israel has no current case of genocide to answer - or the new one being proposed by the likes of South Africa and Ireland because the generally accepted one isn't broad enough to cover those they don't like?
It’s a little sad when you are trying to find the least offensive definition of the word. You choose. The number of deaths will remain the samefaldO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 4:01 pmWhich definition of genocide are you using? The one used by the ICJ - in which case Israel has no current case of genocide to answer - or the new one being proposed by the likes of South Africa and Ireland because the generally accepted one isn't broad enough to cover those they don't like?
I'm curious as to why you suppose genocide is being perpetrated by Israel. The ICJ havent said so and the term has a legal definition. I couldn't care less whether the definition is offensive or not.George M wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 4:56 pmIt’s a little sad when you are trying to find the least offensive definition of the word. You choose. The number of deaths will remain the samefaldO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 4:01 pmWhich definition of genocide are you using? The one used by the ICJ - in which case Israel has no current case of genocide to answer - or the new one being proposed by the likes of South Africa and Ireland because the generally accepted one isn't broad enough to cover those they don't like?
Stop wasting my time on people who don’t have all the facts and just spurt out rubbishGeorge M wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 8:33 amMy agenda is the same as every civilised person in the world. An end to the Genocide , a return to peace , and punishment in an international court for those who deserve it. What’s yours ?
Hop off to whatever stone you were hiding under frogger.Frogger wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 8:16 pmStop wasting my time on people who don’t have all the facts and just spurt out rubbish
About as shakey as your beliefs. The fact that you believe the law will save Israel from being called anything worse than naughty probably saysfaldO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 5:59 pmI'm curious as to why you suppose genocide is being perpetrated by Israel. The ICJ havent said so and the term has a legal definition. I couldn't care less whether the definition is offensive or not.George M wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 4:56 pmIt’s a little sad when you are trying to find the least offensive definition of the word. You choose. The number of deaths will remain the samefaldO wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 4:01 pm
Which definition of genocide are you using? The one used by the ICJ - in which case Israel has no current case of genocide to answer - or the new one being proposed by the likes of South Africa and Ireland because the generally accepted one isn't broad enough to cover those they don't like?
If it's necessary to change the definition, as South Africa and Ireland want to do, so as to fit a narrative, I'd suggest the attempts to pin "genocide" on Israel under the current definition (the one used by the ICJ for example) are on shakey ground.