Page 132 of 253

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:07 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Maybe the national party should give socialism a go. That hasn't been done for at least 18 months

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:27 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Even Mandy was on the news talking about Jezzas “long shadow”

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:28 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Dohnut wrote: Fri May 07, 2021 4:19 pm
greyhound wrote: Fri May 07, 2021 3:58 pm all the labour representatives keep on saying we have to change
change what :?: green ideas or switch to Brexit.
what can they change I am very keen to no. :?: [##]
They already have, to a degree. Labour MP, Shadow Minister, just said on TV that at the last election, people on the doorstep were hostile to Labour. That now is not the case according to her. They are more open to dialogue. That is a major step forward. Labour are no longer the joke, they were. Change of Leader!

What they need to do now is to sell what the party is all about to the general public. Explain what they stand for, their beliefs. It’s a start if people are listening. They just need to talk louder and to the people who matter. That is not Momentum or the union Leaders. Or Corbyn who today is offering advice! Jeez.

The risk is another round of in-fighting. Give Starmer a chance without being hamstrung by people in his own party. The fight is out there, not within. When people grow up to that fact, the Labour Party will genuinely move forward.
Hold on, I thought that it was all about winning elections? Or this that only important when you don’t like the leader?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:49 am
by Dohnut
Max B Gold wrote: Fri May 07, 2021 12:44 pm Corruption is only a matter of degree they all do it. Seriously? Do you think the Tories have pushed the envelope to bursting? Should the police investigate?

I see Johnson's brother now has a job at Dyson. Was it Dyson workers coming to the UK and their tax position that was to be fixed or was it a bit closer to home.

How many ventilators did they deliver to the NHS?

You're right that SirKeith got the wallpaper message wrong. Focusing on the cost of it detracted from the real issue which was about honesty and integrity in govt office.
You need to research Liverpool. Poking fingers at one side or another can be dangerous. Me, I just take the view that both sides can be, let’s say creative, in power.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 8:53 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Rumours that Sirkier has sacked Rayner as party chairperson...... :lol:

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 9:51 pm
by Admin
Confirmed.

Rumour mill on overtime. Apparently Nandy / Dodds both out. Streeting / Phillips / Reeves in.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 9:54 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Smart moves by the leader, shoring up his support while removing the deadwood.

Very promising

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:02 pm
by Admin
Paging COYOS to this thread

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:12 pm
by faldO
Good to see Sir Kier taking full responsibility for the disaster over the past couple of days.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 10:17 pm
by tuffers#1
The Disasters in Wales Manchester & probably London ?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 7:47 am
by Story of O
Thats a bit like saying Southend had a decent season because they beat us and a few other teams. Even the party itself thinks they had a bad time overall.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 10:38 am
by Mistadobalina
As have said in the other thread, Starmer has made this into a disaster by firing Raynor. The corrective to Labours losing of seats in the north is to start taking more liberal but traditionally Tory seats in the south and major cities. They've begun to make that progress in the east and west of the country with the mayorships there. London, Wales and Manchester all retained easily. Thursdays results aren't nearly as bad as they initially seemed.

The lesson from the west midlands and Tees valley is that having a prominent and popular representative for your party brings a reward in Westminster. Labour need to start rebuilding from the bottom up and have a foothold in some of the
areas they need to win over. But instead it's going to be days of MPs briefing against Starmer. He's manager to take a setback and make into a potentially terminal disaster.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 1:11 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Three percent swing Tory to Labour this election from GE2019. Usual caveats apply

As per Yougov

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 3:30 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Any other leader and it would have been a 20 point swing.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 7:08 pm
by Dohnut
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 1:11 pm Three percent swing Tory to Labour this election from GE2019. Usual caveats apply

As per Yougov
I’m surprised by this election, usually such elections are an opportunity to give the incumbent Government a bit of a kicking. Anybody clutching at straws, suggesting it’s not as bad as it seems are not doing the party any favours. It’s bad.

Wake up, Smell the coffee, get behind Starmer. At least until a better leader emerges. Not too many serious contenders right now.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 7:50 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Dohnut wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 7:08 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 1:11 pm Three percent swing Tory to Labour this election from GE2019. Usual caveats apply

As per Yougov
I’m surprised by this election, usually such elections are an opportunity to give the incumbent Government a bit of a kicking. Anybody clutching at straws, suggesting it’s not as bad as it seems are not doing the party any favours. It’s bad.

Wake up, Smell the coffee, get behind Starmer. At least until a better leader emerges. Not too many serious contenders right now.
Labour haven't given the incumbent Govt a kicking at local elections since early Miliband. Last time they gained over 500 seats was 2012.

Corbyn lost seats at 3 out of 4 local elections and was net minus 405 councilors at local elections by the end of his time

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 8:08 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
I wonder how many years it’ll be before Jezzas enemies stop harping on about him?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 9:02 pm
by Dunners
Never.

As for Starmer, this is starting to look like a real crisis.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 9:13 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Until all the piss has left the bath

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 9:16 pm
by Dohnut
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 8:08 pm I wonder how many years it’ll be before Jezzas enemies stop harping on about him?
He has earned his place in history. Finally achieved something.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 9:28 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Labour lose Bristol. f***.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 11:34 pm
by E10EU
Mistadobalina wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 10:38 am As have said in the other thread, Starmer has made this into a disaster by firing Raynor. The corrective to Labours losing of seats in the north is to start taking more liberal but traditionally Tory seats in the south and major cities. They've begun to make that progress in the east and west of the country with the mayorships there. London, Wales and Manchester all retained easily. Thursdays results aren't nearly as bad as they initially seemed.

The lesson from the west midlands and Tees valley is that having a prominent and popular representative for your party brings a reward in Westminster. Labour need to start rebuilding from the bottom up and have a foothold in some of the
areas they need to win over. But instead it's going to be days of MPs briefing against Starmer. He's manager to take a setback and make into a potentially terminal disaster.
Agree entirely.
Starmer totally over reacted. Losing Hartlepool was almost certain as UKIP didn't figure in this bye election. So he shuffles the shadow cabinet in a mad panic. It seems that he hasn't reflected at all, for example: what were the factors leading to the Labour wins in mayoral races, etc. He comes across now as just devoid of emotional intelligence. His actions today won't earn him a more positive appraisal from the general public.
It is said that he is trying to imitate Blair but Blair was quite clever in managing and charming people.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 11:49 pm
by Orientinoz
There is one specific demographic that is keeping Labour from a complete colapse. Looking at the BBC map its quite evident.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon May 10, 2021 8:47 am
by moonwalk19
It’s about time we ended this post.It’s getting boring just like the football Orient have dished up this season.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Mon May 10, 2021 9:19 am
by ComeOnYouOs
I wonder how many people have said " If only Rachel Reeves had been shadow Chancellor instead of Anneleise Dodds, we'd have voted Labour" ?