Page 124 of 253

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
by Real Al
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:22 am
Real Al wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:07 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:43 am

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth
I'd never heard of Wikispooks before.

Took me about 3 minutes to work out it's a wet dream for conspiracy theorists.
It was reported as far back as 2005 .

https://www.prweek.com/article/505302/s ... obby-group
Must be going blind. Can't see a reference to being a CIA operative there.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:44 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:30 am Looking deeper into her career she went from Bicom to well known Mossad front Hope not Hate
Her earlier involvement in HNH and her role in pushing out MI5 asset Gerry Gable and his wife Sonia makes for interesting reading.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:47 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
“Official records show that Ruth Smeeth was funded by two ultra-wealthy figures from the same pro-Israel organisation she once worked for. But these relationships have been overlooked by the British press, which have extensively reported on her allegations of anti-Semitic abuse at the hands of Jeremy Corbyn supporters.”

“What is generally not known is that Ruth Smeeth was identified by WikiLeaks, via a US embassy diplomatic cable, as a “strictly protect” – US informant.”


source :https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:51 pm
by Thor
This has got potential gonna check back in later.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:23 pm
by Real Al
Oh you guys really need to use the internet - it was quite easy to find what you were looking for
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON956_a.html

Here's the part you're referring to

Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20.
Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.)

So she basically told someone that Brown planned an election but then cancelled it. And from this you deduced hat she's a CIA asset. Seems a bit of a leap.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:42 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Real Al wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:23 pm Oh you guys really need to use the internet - it was quite easy to find what you were looking for
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON956_a.html

Here's the part you're referring to

Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20.
Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.)

So she basically told someone that Brown planned an election but then cancelled it. And from this you deduced hat she's a CIA asset. Seems a bit of a leap.
I did see that myself. The person that she told that was Hillary Clinton, who was Secretary of State at the time, in Obama's government.
From that it isn't hard to deduce she was working, as a spy, for the USA

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:17 pm
by Real Al
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:42 pm
Real Al wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:23 pm Oh you guys really need to use the internet - it was quite easy to find what you were looking for
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON956_a.html

Here's the part you're referring to

Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20.
Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.)

So she basically told someone that Brown planned an election but then cancelled it. And from this you deduced hat she's a CIA asset. Seems a bit of a leap.
I did see that myself. The person that she told that was Hillary Clinton, who was Secretary of State at the time, in Obama's government.
From that it isn't hard to deduce she was working, as a spy, for the USA
Ah, you'll have to provide a link for the Clinton bit. Can't find that anywhere

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:26 pm
by Max B Gold
Real Al wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:23 pm Oh you guys really need to use the internet - it was quite easy to find what you were looking for
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON956_a.html

Here's the part you're referring to

Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20.
Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.)

So she basically told someone that Brown planned an election but then cancelled it. And from this you deduced hat she's a CIA asset. Seems a bit of a leap.
Do you think the words "strictly protect" have any significance?

Why is she passing confidential information to the US at all?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:29 pm
by Max B Gold
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:42 pm
Real Al wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:23 pm Oh you guys really need to use the internet - it was quite easy to find what you were looking for
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON956_a.html

Here's the part you're referring to

Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20.
Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.)

So she basically told someone that Brown planned an election but then cancelled it. And from this you deduced hat she's a CIA asset. Seems a bit of a leap.
I did see that myself. The person that she told that was Hillary Clinton, who was Secretary of State at the time, in Obama's government.
From that it isn't hard to deduce she was working, as a spy, for the USA
I don't believe you can deduce from that she is a spy. There is a big difference between a spy and an asset.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:54 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
She’s only passing info to the US, she’s not spying as such.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:26 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Whether she's a spy or an asset doesn't really matter, there's not a lot of difference at the end of the day, the fact is, she was passing on government information to a foreign power ( albeit an ally).
Why didn't Clinton just ring up Brown and ask him? Probably because she didn't want him to know, she was interested, so she asked Smeeth to get the info behind Browns back and pass it on.
Smeeth wasnt even an MP at the time
IMO shes a dangerous woman, not to be trusted at all

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:31 pm
by Long slender neck
Wasn't Jeremy on the books of the Czechs though?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:09 pm
by Max B Gold
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:31 pm Wasn't Jeremy on the books of the Czechs though?
Agent COB was not on the books of the Czechs even the accomplished liar and hard right propogandist Tom Bower says as much in his hatchet job excuse for a book on Jez.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:26 pm
by Thor
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:09 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:31 pm Wasn't Jeremy on the books of the Czechs though?
Agent COB was not on the books of the Czechs even the accomplished liar and hard right propogandist Tom Bower says as much in his hatchet job excuse for a book on Jez.
If max says he wasn't you can bet your bottom dollar he was.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:28 pm
by Thor

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:42 pm
by Max B Gold
Thor wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:28 pm Oh dear.

https://observer.com/2018/02/new-report ... -in-1980s/
:lol: :lol: Schindler - the cold war spook who sent pictures of his Willy down the internet. On a credibility scale of where one is low and 10 is high he scores a zero.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:50 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:28 pm Oh dear.

https://observer.com/2018/02/new-report ... -in-1980s/
Semtex Thorbyn ,
I've already explained on here why corbyn was dealing with Czechoslovakia. .
Semtex From there went to libya then ireland & then used here & Northern Ireland.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:27 pm
by Real Al
Diversionary tactics.

Where's the proof she spoke to Clinton?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:33 pm
by Max B Gold
Real Al wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:27 pm Diversionary tactics.

Where's the proof she spoke to Clinton?
Irrelevant question.

We have proof of her passing on the info as it's in the strictly protect US embassy communication. It doesn't matter if it was passed directly to Clinton or not.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:39 pm
by Real Al
Overruled.

Answer the question

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:04 pm
by Long slender neck
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:50 pm
Thor wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:28 pm Oh dear.

https://observer.com/2018/02/new-report ... -in-1980s/
Semtex Thorbyn ,
I've already explained on here why corbyn was dealing with Czechoslovakia. .
Semtex From there went to libya then ireland & then used here & Northern Ireland.
Eh?

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:08 pm
by tuffers#1
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:04 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:50 pm
Thor wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:28 pm Oh dear.

https://observer.com/2018/02/new-report ... -in-1980s/
Semtex Thorbyn ,
I've already explained on here why corbyn was dealing with Czechoslovakia. .
Semtex From there went to libya then ireland & then used here & Northern Ireland.
Eh?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politi ... ssets/amp/



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semtex

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:32 pm
by Long slender neck
160'd.

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:49 pm
by tuffers#1
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:32 pm 160+'d.
Corrected

Re: Labour Watch

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:51 pm
by Thor
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:08 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:04 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:50 pm

Semtex Thorbyn ,
I've already explained on here why corbyn was dealing with Czechoslovakia. .
Semtex From there went to libya then ireland & then used here & Northern Ireland.
Eh?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politi ... ssets/amp/



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semtex
Interesting Tuffers.