Page 106 of 266
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:22 pm
by Dunners
As unfair as he would have found it, it would probably have been for the best if Corbyn had used Starmer's appointment as party leader as an opportunity to retire.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:22 pm
by Max B Gold
Admin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:11 pm
Regardless of whether you're pro, anti or plain old couldn't give a f*** about Corbyn as he's yesterday's man, this latest saga is nothing but good news for the tories.
Had to be a better way somehow for Starmer and the Party to have dealt with this.
And that is precisely the reason Starmer has to go. Total lack of political judgement.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:30 pm
by Dunners
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:22 pm
Admin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:11 pm
Regardless of whether you're pro, anti or plain old couldn't give a f*** about Corbyn as he's yesterday's man, this latest saga is nothing but good news for the tories.
Had to be a better way somehow for Starmer and the Party to have dealt with this.
And that is precisely the reason Starmer has to go. Total lack of political judgement.
Get in.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:43 pm
by Stowaway
Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:22 pm
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:14 pm
Best you go to bed really mate, you clearly struggle with this sort of stuff. You know a 'broken clock' and all that? This racist dullard was the messenger referencing the source.
I always had you down as playing thick rather than being it. My mistake.
Glad you're not a cu*t
He’s got you sussed tho.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:50 pm
by Stowaway
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:33 pm
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:53 pm
Stowaway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:47 pm
I’m looking forward to hearing Margaret Hodge’s view on this and watching her lose her sh*t completely.
I post the second tweet up because I think it's an important point about perception. (But acknowledge the problem is still massive for Labour and will be for some time/forever).
In what way is the problem massive if only 0.3% were anti-Semitic. Identify them and kick them out. Job done problem dealt with. Move on.
Hodge needs to be expelled for constantly stirring up controversy and disunity. She is continually bringing the party into disrepute.
Over and above the antisemitism issue she clearly has personal problems with JC.
Horrible woman. She even used the old “my father fled the Holocaust” line in her reasoning, omitting to mention that her father left Germany in 1932 to take a job at his uncle’s company in Egypt, a year before the Nazis even gained office.
She’s done far more to bring the party into disrepute than Corbyn ever did.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:12 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:18 pm
Why right now as well? Was there a call for it to be right now? I think they had a bigger window to deal with this.
Why right now? Hodge has been speed dealing him constantly for the past 24 hours, he had to make it stop somehow.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:13 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:22 pm
As unfair as he would have found it, it would probably have been for the best if Corbyn had used Starmer's appointment as party leader as an opportunity to retire.
The best for who? Not for socialists.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:17 pm
by PoliticOs
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:13 pm
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:22 pm
As unfair as he would have found it, it would probably have been for the best if Corbyn had used Starmer's appointment as party leader as an opportunity to retire.
The best for who? Not for socialists.
Do you think Jeremy Corbyn is, in 2020, helping the cause of socialism in the UK?
I'm not so sure it could be answered as; 'yes' anymore. (And there was a point he clearly was for any of you cheeky devils picking up on 'anymore').
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:33 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Yes.
Next question.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:55 pm
by PoliticOs
What do you think is better, Playstation or XBox?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 8:39 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
We’re PS but honestly couldn’t say.
This is fun.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:10 pm
by Dohnut
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:48 pm
Jezza needs to dip into that fund he has and obtain restraining orders from these reptiles.
If I was his neighbour I would pour a bucket of poo poo over them from the roof.
If I was his neighbour I’d move. But being his neighbour wouldn’t happen, I couldn’t afford to live where he does.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:59 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Dohnut wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:10 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:48 pm
Jezza needs to dip into that fund he has and obtain restraining orders from these reptiles.
If I was his neighbour I would pour a bucket of poo poo over them from the roof.
If I was his neighbour I’d move. But being his neighbour wouldn’t happen, I couldn’t afford to live where he does.
You should have worked harder before you retired then.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:04 pm
by Stowaway
Dohnut wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:10 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:48 pm
Jezza needs to dip into that fund he has and obtain restraining orders from these reptiles.
If I was his neighbour I would pour a bucket of poo poo over them from the roof.
If I was his neighbour I’d move. But being his neighbour wouldn’t happen, I couldn’t afford to live where he does.
You probably could. He lives in a pretty modest house, y’know. Islington isn’t all posh, some parts are really grim.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:16 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Does he actually live in his constituency? How novel.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:24 pm
by Dunners
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:16 pm
Does he actually live in his constituency? How novel.
Jeremy Corbyn's Islington home on sale but only a
Champagne socialist could afford it!!!
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-392843 ... rd-it.html
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:36 pm
by PoliticOs
Those are the WORST ones
The one's that made money and even then still want to turn their back on capitalism to help others. Makes me sick.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:45 pm
by tuffers#1
Posting a link to a page of nothing !
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:55 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:36 pm
Those are the WORST ones
The one's that made money and even then still want to turn their back on capitalism to help others. Makes me sick.
What does this 'helping' entail?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:56 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:45 pm
Posting a link to a page of nothing !
Forgive him, we all get like that with technology at some point:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rd-it.html
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:08 pm
by PoliticOs
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:55 pm
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:36 pm
Those are the WORST ones
The one's that made money and even then still want to turn their back on capitalism to help others. Makes me sick.
What does this 'helping' entail?
Are you sharing stuff on Facebook? If so, you're all done.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:22 pm
by Dunners
You have to share? Doesn't clicking the odd 'like' do enough?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:24 pm
by PoliticOs
It doesn't say 'I bet no one cares enough to share. Will even 5 people on my friends list be kind and share?' for no reason mate.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 5:22 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
So you need a minimum of 5 friends? Bugger.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 5:30 pm
by PoliticOs
Staff will do.
